[討論] 本壘衝撞規則真的有認真執行嗎?消失
新聞說中職今年已經實施了
詳見:
http://www.appledaily.com.tw/realtimenews/article/new/20160120/779760/
可是今天忘記幾局,大王從三壘跑本壘被觸殺那球
其實我第一時間就覺得有妨礙拉~
因為之前MLB有一個判決跟今天跑、守站位幾乎一模一樣,最後也改判得分有效
請看
http://m.mlb.com/video/topic/63817564/v35332785/cwssf-review-overturns-call-in
蔡明里是說達鬨有讓出一半路徑,所以不算妨礙
我沒查中職規則,不過應該不至於認定上會跟大聯盟不同
接球時要離開跑壘線是波西rule的精神
(主播有他的立場我能理解就是了...)
不過球隊沒提出挑戰,主審感覺第一時間也沒意識到這件事做出相關裁判
個人淺見這球是有機會成為中職日後判決標竿的,真的有點可惜...
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 220.137.155.79
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Baseball/M.1460135744.A.DCE.html
推
04/09 01:16, , 1F
04/09 01:16, 1F
噓
04/09 01:16, , 2F
04/09 01:16, 2F
推
04/09 01:16, , 3F
04/09 01:16, 3F
→
04/09 01:16, , 4F
04/09 01:16, 4F
推
04/09 01:16, , 5F
04/09 01:16, 5F
推
04/09 01:17, , 6F
04/09 01:17, 6F
噓
04/09 01:17, , 7F
04/09 01:17, 7F
噓
04/09 01:17, , 8F
04/09 01:17, 8F
這幾天看日職轉播他們也都很徹底實施,美職、日職都一樣標準
可以說說看中職標準是什麼嗎?
→
04/09 01:18, , 9F
04/09 01:18, 9F
推
04/09 01:18, , 10F
04/09 01:18, 10F
推
04/09 01:18, , 11F
04/09 01:18, 11F
不是壘包,是跑壘路徑
※ 編輯: davidrick (220.137.155.79), 04/09/2016 01:20:55
→
04/09 01:19, , 12F
04/09 01:19, 12F
噓
04/09 01:20, , 13F
04/09 01:20, 13F
不是壘包,是跑壘路徑
※ 編輯: davidrick (220.137.155.79), 04/09/2016 01:21:46
推
04/09 01:21, , 14F
04/09 01:21, 14F
※ 編輯: davidrick (220.137.155.79), 04/09/2016 01:23:02
→
04/09 01:23, , 15F
04/09 01:23, 15F
→
04/09 01:23, , 16F
04/09 01:23, 16F
如果洪中爭論了相信閣下也只會酸,而不肯睜開眼睛
※ 編輯: davidrick (220.137.155.79), 04/09/2016 01:24:36
→
04/09 01:23, , 17F
04/09 01:23, 17F
推
04/09 01:24, , 18F
04/09 01:24, 18F
推
04/09 01:25, , 19F
04/09 01:25, 19F
→
04/09 01:26, , 20F
04/09 01:26, 20F
你說得沒錯,這在邊問的文根本不影響
所以棒球版上所有討論文基本上也都是廢文
※ 編輯: davidrick (220.137.155.79), 04/09/2016 01:28:04
→
04/09 01:26, , 21F
04/09 01:26, 21F
推
04/09 01:27, , 22F
04/09 01:27, 22F
→
04/09 01:27, , 23F
04/09 01:27, 23F
→
04/09 01:28, , 24F
04/09 01:28, 24F
推
04/09 01:28, , 25F
04/09 01:28, 25F
→
04/09 01:29, , 26F
04/09 01:29, 26F
重點是在達鬨,他應該往前站一步接球
他左腳跨的位置明顯是要阻擋跑壘者的跑壘路徑,讓跑者繞到後方其實就算了
(8局那球都把滑壘的腳擋開了...)
推
04/09 01:30, , 27F
04/09 01:30, 27F
→
04/09 01:30, , 28F
04/09 01:30, 28F
※ 編輯: davidrick (220.137.155.79), 04/09/2016 01:34:18
推
04/09 01:33, , 29F
04/09 01:33, 29F
→
04/09 01:33, , 30F
04/09 01:33, 30F
※ 編輯: davidrick (220.137.155.79), 04/09/2016 01:34:43
推
04/09 01:37, , 31F
04/09 01:37, 31F
→
04/09 01:38, , 32F
04/09 01:38, 32F
※ 編輯: davidrick (220.137.155.79), 04/09/2016 01:38:29
推
04/09 01:54, , 33F
04/09 01:54, 33F
噓
04/09 01:58, , 34F
04/09 01:58, 34F
→
04/09 01:59, , 35F
04/09 01:59, 35F
推
04/09 02:03, , 36F
04/09 02:03, 36F
推
04/09 02:07, , 37F
04/09 02:07, 37F
推
04/09 02:23, , 38F
04/09 02:23, 38F
→
04/09 02:23, , 39F
04/09 02:23, 39F
噓
04/09 02:50, , 40F
04/09 02:50, 40F
卡死才算妨害是舊規則囉~
推
04/09 03:02, , 41F
04/09 03:02, 41F
→
04/09 03:07, , 42F
04/09 03:07, 42F
※ 編輯: davidrick (220.137.155.79), 04/09/2016 03:10:17
推
04/09 03:28, , 43F
04/09 03:28, 43F
噓
04/09 03:47, , 44F
04/09 03:47, 44F
噓
04/09 06:58, , 45F
04/09 06:58, 45F
推
04/09 06:59, , 46F
04/09 06:59, 46F
噓
04/09 07:28, , 47F
04/09 07:28, 47F
噓
04/09 08:09, , 48F
04/09 08:09, 48F
推
04/09 08:29, , 49F
04/09 08:29, 49F
→
04/09 08:30, , 50F
04/09 08:30, 50F
噓
04/09 09:12, , 51F
04/09 09:12, 51F
推
04/09 09:58, , 52F
04/09 09:58, 52F
推
04/09 10:32, , 53F
04/09 10:32, 53F
噓
04/09 10:33, , 54F
04/09 10:33, 54F