Re: [問題] 九下為什麼不觸擊已回收
※ 引述《cesty (晚安地球人)》之銘言:
: 昨晚的狀況就是我們要挑戰吳昇桓,從他手中擊出安打來結束比賽
: 但結果大家都知道了
: 換個狀況想,假設我們今天把人送上三壘,要挑戰的還是吳昇桓嗎?
: 先假設人已經送上三壘,這時候雙方的情勢會大大改變
為何要先假設人已經送上三壘?
中職觸擊成功率大約70幾% 但這是面對高低階投手的平均
我相信面對高階投手會降低,因為大家常說高階投手的球不好掌握
既然不好掌握 那觸擊也一樣會更難點
就假設稍微降低一點還有70%成功率好了
簡單問你一個問題,一個上壘率三成的打者上場 (出局機會七成)
你會直接先假設他已經出局了再來討論後面可能發生的事情嗎?
我一直搞不懂為何贊成點的人 都只討論點成功的時候?
如果作戰術不用考慮失敗率,那你乾脆說換代跑盜三壘好了
盜壘成功 直接3壘有人無人出局不是更好?
當然你會說盜壘不一定成功 那觸擊也一樣啊?盜壘就會考慮失敗率 觸擊就不用?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 59.120.72.111
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Baseball/M.1489125852.A.095.html
→
03/10 14:05, , 1F
03/10 14:05, 1F
→
03/10 14:05, , 2F
03/10 14:05, 2F
推
03/10 14:05, , 3F
03/10 14:05, 3F
→
03/10 14:05, , 4F
03/10 14:05, 4F
推
03/10 14:06, , 5F
03/10 14:06, 5F
推
03/10 14:06, , 6F
03/10 14:06, 6F
噓
03/10 14:06, , 7F
03/10 14:06, 7F
→
03/10 14:06, , 8F
03/10 14:06, 8F
→
03/10 14:06, , 9F
03/10 14:06, 9F
→
03/10 14:06, , 10F
03/10 14:06, 10F
推
03/10 14:06, , 11F
03/10 14:06, 11F
→
03/10 14:06, , 12F
03/10 14:06, 12F
→
03/10 14:07, , 13F
03/10 14:07, 13F
→
03/10 14:07, , 14F
03/10 14:07, 14F
→
03/10 14:07, , 15F
03/10 14:07, 15F
→
03/10 14:07, , 16F
03/10 14:07, 16F
→
03/10 14:07, , 17F
03/10 14:07, 17F
推
03/10 14:07, , 18F
03/10 14:07, 18F
推
03/10 14:07, , 19F
03/10 14:07, 19F
→
03/10 14:07, , 20F
03/10 14:07, 20F
→
03/10 14:07, , 21F
03/10 14:07, 21F
→
03/10 14:07, , 22F
03/10 14:07, 22F
→
03/10 14:07, , 23F
03/10 14:07, 23F
→
03/10 14:07, , 24F
03/10 14:07, 24F
→
03/10 14:08, , 25F
03/10 14:08, 25F
→
03/10 14:08, , 26F
03/10 14:08, 26F
推
03/10 14:08, , 27F
03/10 14:08, 27F
→
03/10 14:08, , 28F
03/10 14:08, 28F
→
03/10 14:08, , 29F
03/10 14:08, 29F
推
03/10 14:08, , 30F
03/10 14:08, 30F
→
03/10 14:08, , 31F
03/10 14:08, 31F
→
03/10 14:08, , 32F
03/10 14:08, 32F
推
03/10 14:09, , 33F
03/10 14:09, 33F
→
03/10 14:09, , 34F
03/10 14:09, 34F
→
03/10 14:09, , 35F
03/10 14:09, 35F
推
03/10 14:09, , 36F
03/10 14:09, 36F
→
03/10 14:09, , 37F
03/10 14:09, 37F
→
03/10 14:10, , 38F
03/10 14:10, 38F
→
03/10 14:10, , 39F
03/10 14:10, 39F
還有 243 則推文
→
03/10 14:56, , 283F
03/10 14:56, 283F
噓
03/10 14:56, , 284F
03/10 14:56, 284F
→
03/10 14:56, , 285F
03/10 14:56, 285F
→
03/10 14:56, , 286F
03/10 14:56, 286F
→
03/10 14:56, , 287F
03/10 14:56, 287F
→
03/10 14:56, , 288F
03/10 14:56, 288F
→
03/10 14:56, , 289F
03/10 14:56, 289F
→
03/10 14:57, , 290F
03/10 14:57, 290F
→
03/10 14:57, , 291F
03/10 14:57, 291F
→
03/10 14:57, , 292F
03/10 14:57, 292F
→
03/10 14:57, , 293F
03/10 14:57, 293F
→
03/10 14:59, , 294F
03/10 14:59, 294F
→
03/10 14:59, , 295F
03/10 14:59, 295F
→
03/10 15:00, , 296F
03/10 15:00, 296F
→
03/10 15:00, , 297F
03/10 15:00, 297F
→
03/10 15:03, , 298F
03/10 15:03, 298F
→
03/10 15:03, , 299F
03/10 15:03, 299F
推
03/10 15:08, , 300F
03/10 15:08, 300F
→
03/10 15:08, , 301F
03/10 15:08, 301F
→
03/10 15:09, , 302F
03/10 15:09, 302F
→
03/10 15:11, , 303F
03/10 15:11, 303F
→
03/10 15:11, , 304F
03/10 15:11, 304F
噓
03/10 15:16, , 305F
03/10 15:16, 305F
→
03/10 15:16, , 306F
03/10 15:16, 306F
→
03/10 15:25, , 307F
03/10 15:25, 307F
→
03/10 15:45, , 308F
03/10 15:45, 308F
→
03/10 15:45, , 309F
03/10 15:45, 309F
推
03/10 16:03, , 310F
03/10 16:03, 310F
→
03/10 16:03, , 311F
03/10 16:03, 311F
→
03/10 16:06, , 312F
03/10 16:06, 312F
→
03/10 16:06, , 313F
03/10 16:06, 313F
→
03/10 16:10, , 314F
03/10 16:10, 314F
→
03/10 16:10, , 315F
03/10 16:10, 315F
推
03/10 16:36, , 316F
03/10 16:36, 316F
→
03/10 16:37, , 317F
03/10 16:37, 317F
→
03/10 16:37, , 318F
03/10 16:37, 318F
噓
03/10 19:54, , 319F
03/10 19:54, 319F
→
03/10 19:54, , 320F
03/10 19:54, 320F
推
03/11 14:55, , 321F
03/11 14:55, 321F
→
03/11 14:56, , 322F
03/11 14:56, 322F
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
問題
22
79
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 35 之 55 篇):
問題
112
288
問題
51
370
問題
42
133
問題
40
91
問題
17
44
問題
136
691
問題
36
111
問題
77
343