Re: [轉錄][新聞] Cyber-Detectives Deep Six Cell …
因版權問題
僅轉錄幾段重點
http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/314/5806/1669a
News of the Week
SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT:
Online Sleuths Challenge Cell Paper
Hao Xin
[deleted]
In an e-mail to Science, Yu-Chan Chao, dean of the College of Life Sciences
at the university, calls the episode an "unfortunate case." But Chao went on
to say that Chang's team had provided "repeatable data suggesting that their
overall conclusions were correct and reproducible."
The Cell paper, which questioned prevailing views of how transcription of a
gene's DNA begins in bacteria, was challenged publicly on 16 November when an
anonymous posting appeared on an electronic bulletin board run by Chinese
students in the United States. The posting alleged that starting with figure
2 of the paper, "several dozen western lanes appeared to be copied and
pasted." The board has been abuzz with discussions about the study since
then. Another poster claimed to have used "difference blending," a feature of
the image software Adobe Photoshop, to compare the upper parts of lanes in
the high-resolution version of panel C of figure 2 of the Cell paper and
concluded that they were almost identical.
A subsequent reply on the board attributed to Chang denied any wrongdoing.
And in an e-mail to Science last week, before the university investigation,
Chang denied that images in the paper had been manipulated and stated that
the "conclusion we made for the Cell paper is true on the basis of our data."
[deleted]
After Chang's online rebuttal, bulletin-board posters said they would contact
Michael Rossner, managing editor of the Journal of Cell Biology and an expert
on detecting image manipulation. Rossner confirmed to Science by e-mail that
he was familiar with the case and "agree[s] with the students that some of
the images are indeed questionable." Cell also received word of the
allegations and started an investigation, confirmed Emilie Marcus, the
journal's executive editor. (As Science went to press, Cell had not published
a retraction, and Chang had not confirmed that he was retracting the paper.)
Last Friday, Chung Hsing University convened a committee, which consisted of
two university vice presidents, the dean of the College of Life Sciences, and
two top scientists from outside the university, to investigate the alleged
manipulation. They advised Chang to retract the paper, Chao wrote. "The
university will take this as a serious lesson for ethics education at all the
colleges in the future," he added.
[deleted]
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 146.189.54.60
推
12/15 06:11, , 1F
12/15 06:11, 1F
→
12/15 06:12, , 2F
12/15 06:12, 2F
→
12/15 06:20, , 3F
12/15 06:20, 3F
→
12/15 06:21, , 4F
12/15 06:21, 4F
推
12/15 07:12, , 5F
12/15 07:12, 5F
→
12/15 07:14, , 6F
12/15 07:14, 6F
推
12/16 13:04, , 7F
12/16 13:04, 7F