Re: [閒聊] paladins官方回應overwatch粉絲的攻已回收
※ 引述《a127 (毛蘿蔔)》之銘言:
: 話說暴雪娛樂除了暗黑破壞神以外,
: 還有"原創"過什麼東西嗎?
還不是龍與地下城演變來的
: WC、SC,踩在RTS的肩膀上更加發揚光大。
RTS又不是一款遊戲,要也是說沙丘魔堡
: WOW,也不是第一個MMORPG...
: 爐石戰記,在這之前有N個卡牌遊戲
: 鬥陣特攻,明顯不就是TF2的概念...甚至更早也有特殊功能兵種的FPS。
說白了就是名氣大就會拉仇恨
每個人都在做的事,暴雪做就會有腦粉亂唬爛跟腦補,然後反暴雪廚就開始反串跟見縫插
針
今天GW2出了團本跟5人副本,反暴雪的人有出來指責GW2抄襲wow嗎? 做了一個主軸是坦
補打的mmorpg ,相同標準 下是否該向wow道歉?
這些情況幾乎不會看到吧
但是今天換成暴雪做了一款卡牌,一款射擊遊戲,從消息出來的那天就會被放在顯微鏡底
下檢視,今天反暴雪反到沒有理智的人看到的都是抄襲的影子
另外暴雪的某些粉絲也要自己檢討,遊戲百百款你想到的點子別人也想的到,人家一款新
遊戲就算用了類似的概念,重點也還是在好不好玩,不要只會緊抓著旁枝末節攻擊,有時
看到偏激發言,都不知道是太愛暴雪,還是在反串…
: 我以為玩家的態度一直都是認為
: "這遊戲的概念好屌,如果給暴雪作品質會更好,一定會更好玩。"
說的不錯
: 結果看一看發現有蠻多人以為暴雪是遊戲概念原創的領航人了...
: 實在是有點稀噓耶...
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 1.174.132.189
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/C_Chat/M.1474534817.A.C0A.html
→
09/22 17:01, , 1F
09/22 17:01, 1F
→
09/22 17:02, , 2F
09/22 17:02, 2F
→
09/22 17:07, , 3F
09/22 17:07, 3F
→
09/22 17:07, , 4F
09/22 17:07, 4F
→
09/22 17:07, , 5F
09/22 17:07, 5F
反串居多,就是想看有沒有人被逼急了釣起來攻擊暴雪
而且很多人不知道"遊戲驢子"的那部影片是paladin製作公司贊助的工商嗎?
製作公司就是有意要透過抄襲的話題來打知名度
推
09/22 17:08, , 6F
09/22 17:08, 6F
→
09/22 17:08, , 7F
09/22 17:08, 7F
→
09/22 17:09, , 8F
09/22 17:09, 8F
彼此彼此,但是被攻擊的都是wow居多,都幾?
※ 編輯: sumarai (1.174.132.189), 09/22/2016 17:15:02
→
09/22 17:12, , 9F
09/22 17:12, 9F
推
09/22 17:12, , 10F
09/22 17:12, 10F
→
09/22 17:13, , 11F
09/22 17:13, 11F
→
09/22 17:13, , 12F
09/22 17:13, 12F
→
09/22 17:14, , 13F
09/22 17:14, 13F
推
09/22 17:15, , 14F
09/22 17:15, 14F
→
09/22 17:17, , 15F
09/22 17:17, 15F
→
09/22 17:17, , 16F
09/22 17:17, 16F
就從40k改的,希望粉絲(sc)了解一下自己喜歡遊戲的歷史,要跟人家戰也要有點東西能
講
※ 編輯: sumarai (1.174.132.189), 09/22/2016 17:20:21
→
09/22 17:20, , 17F
09/22 17:20, 17F
→
09/22 17:21, , 18F
09/22 17:21, 18F
→
09/22 17:22, , 19F
09/22 17:22, 19F
推
09/22 17:22, , 20F
09/22 17:22, 20F
→
09/22 17:22, , 21F
09/22 17:22, 21F
暗黑原本是要走龍與地下城的玩法,因為在當年這類型最紅,之後某些堅持才做成現在這
樣
原本就是想做40k但是沒拿到版權,才魔改成sc
→
09/22 17:23, , 22F
09/22 17:23, 22F
→
09/22 17:23, , 23F
09/22 17:23, 23F
→
09/22 17:24, , 24F
09/22 17:24, 24F
→
09/22 17:24, , 25F
09/22 17:24, 25F
※ 編輯: sumarai (1.174.132.189), 09/22/2016 17:29:23
→
09/22 17:25, , 26F
09/22 17:25, 26F
推
09/22 17:25, , 27F
09/22 17:25, 27F
→
09/22 17:26, , 28F
09/22 17:26, 28F
→
09/22 17:26, , 29F
09/22 17:26, 29F
推
09/22 17:26, , 30F
09/22 17:26, 30F
→
09/22 17:27, , 31F
09/22 17:27, 31F
→
09/22 17:28, , 32F
09/22 17:28, 32F
推
09/22 17:32, , 33F
09/22 17:32, 33F
推
09/22 17:33, , 34F
09/22 17:33, 34F
還有 59 則推文
推
09/22 17:55, , 94F
09/22 17:55, 94F
→
09/22 17:55, , 95F
09/22 17:55, 95F
→
09/22 17:55, , 96F
09/22 17:55, 96F
→
09/22 17:55, , 97F
09/22 17:55, 97F
→
09/22 17:55, , 98F
09/22 17:55, 98F
→
09/22 17:55, , 99F
09/22 17:55, 99F
→
09/22 17:56, , 100F
09/22 17:56, 100F
推
09/22 17:57, , 101F
09/22 17:57, 101F
→
09/22 17:57, , 102F
09/22 17:57, 102F
→
09/22 17:57, , 103F
09/22 17:57, 103F
→
09/22 17:58, , 104F
09/22 17:58, 104F
推
09/22 17:59, , 105F
09/22 17:59, 105F
推
09/22 18:00, , 106F
09/22 18:00, 106F
→
09/22 18:00, , 107F
09/22 18:00, 107F
→
09/22 18:00, , 108F
09/22 18:00, 108F
→
09/22 18:00, , 109F
09/22 18:00, 109F
推
09/22 18:02, , 110F
09/22 18:02, 110F
→
09/22 18:02, , 111F
09/22 18:02, 111F
→
09/22 18:02, , 112F
09/22 18:02, 112F
→
09/22 18:02, , 113F
09/22 18:02, 113F
→
09/22 18:02, , 114F
09/22 18:02, 114F
推
09/22 18:06, , 115F
09/22 18:06, 115F
→
09/22 18:06, , 116F
09/22 18:06, 116F
推
09/22 18:07, , 117F
09/22 18:07, 117F
推
09/22 18:14, , 118F
09/22 18:14, 118F
→
09/22 18:14, , 119F
09/22 18:14, 119F
→
09/22 18:14, , 120F
09/22 18:14, 120F
→
09/22 18:14, , 121F
09/22 18:14, 121F
→
09/22 18:15, , 122F
09/22 18:15, 122F
→
09/22 18:15, , 123F
09/22 18:15, 123F
推
09/22 18:36, , 124F
09/22 18:36, 124F
推
09/22 18:41, , 125F
09/22 18:41, 125F
→
09/22 18:42, , 126F
09/22 18:42, 126F
→
09/22 18:42, , 127F
09/22 18:42, 127F
→
09/22 18:43, , 128F
09/22 18:43, 128F
→
09/22 18:43, , 129F
09/22 18:43, 129F
推
09/22 21:01, , 130F
09/22 21:01, 130F
推
09/23 18:38, , 131F
09/23 18:38, 131F
→
09/23 18:39, , 132F
09/23 18:39, 132F
推
10/06 10:39, , 133F
10/06 10:39, 133F