[考題] 民法共同侵權行為與民法217條
甲駕駛機車載乙,與丙發生車禍,致乙跌落機車,身體多處受傷,經查甲、丙均有過失。
下列敘述,何者錯誤?
(A)乙得向丙請求損害賠償
(B)丙不得主張乙應承擔甲之過失
(C)乙得向甲請求損害賠償
(D)甲丙為共同侵權行為人
民法217
損害之發生或擴大,被害人與有過失者,法院得減輕賠償金額,或免除之。
重大之損害原因,為債務人所不及知,而被害人不預促其注意或怠於避免或減少損害
者,為與有過失。
前二項之規定,於被害人之代理人或使用人與有過失者,準用之。
答案為B
所以丙得主張乙應承擔甲之過失
請問丙須承擔是因為甲是乙的代理人嗎?
所以只要代理人有過失本人就視為與有過失嗎?
感謝版上前輩指教!
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 36.233.139.215
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Examination/M.1446285859.A.8F6.html
推
10/31 18:31, , 1F
10/31 18:31, 1F
→
10/31 18:31, , 2F
10/31 18:31, 2F
→
10/31 18:47, , 3F
10/31 18:47, 3F
→
10/31 18:48, , 4F
10/31 18:48, 4F
→
10/31 18:52, , 5F
10/31 18:52, 5F
→
10/31 18:52, , 6F
10/31 18:52, 6F
→
10/31 19:06, , 7F
10/31 19:06, 7F
推
10/31 19:52, , 8F
10/31 19:52, 8F
→
10/31 20:36, , 9F
10/31 20:36, 9F
推
10/31 21:48, , 10F
10/31 21:48, 10F
→
10/31 21:48, , 11F
10/31 21:48, 11F
→
10/31 23:48, , 12F
10/31 23:48, 12F
推
11/01 00:26, , 13F
11/01 00:26, 13F
→
11/01 00:26, , 14F
11/01 00:26, 14F
→
11/01 00:27, , 15F
11/01 00:27, 15F
→
11/01 00:34, , 16F
11/01 00:34, 16F
→
11/01 00:36, , 17F
11/01 00:36, 17F
推
11/01 00:37, , 18F
11/01 00:37, 18F
→
11/01 00:38, , 19F
11/01 00:38, 19F
→
11/01 00:38, , 20F
11/01 00:38, 20F
→
11/01 00:40, , 21F
11/01 00:40, 21F
→
11/01 00:40, , 22F
11/01 00:40, 22F
→
11/01 00:44, , 23F
11/01 00:44, 23F
→
11/01 00:47, , 24F
11/01 00:47, 24F
→
11/01 00:47, , 25F
11/01 00:47, 25F
→
11/01 07:59, , 26F
11/01 07:59, 26F
→
11/01 16:13, , 27F
11/01 16:13, 27F