[問題] 請教一題argument

看板GRE作者 (流星)時間16年前 (2008/08/20 10:36), 編輯推噓2(209)
留言11則, 2人參與, 最新討論串1/1
剛剛練習到一篇 找不太出裡面的缺點 煩請各位高手解答 感謝!! ARGUMENT107 - The following appeared in an editorial in the Seatown newspaper. "Seatown has a large port exclusively for fishing boats, whose owners pay fees for the upkeep of the docks and for facilities for cleaning engines and repairing nets. In recent years, declining fish populations have decreased fishing revenue and forced many owners to stop fishing altogether. As a result, the port has a high vacancy rate and port managers are considering allowing pleasure boats, including cruise ships and other large vessels, to use the port in order to increase revenue. But allowing pleasure boats into the port would be a mistake, because the fishing boats would be forced out of the port. We should preserve the port for the fishing fleet, which, unlike pleasure boats, contributes to the prosperity of Seatown." -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 140.127.59.22

08/20 11:36, , 1F
原文認為保留釣魚小船才是正確,那就攻擊釣
08/20 11:36, 1F

08/20 11:38, , 2F
魚這項活動是有缺陷或困境。
08/20 11:38, 2F

08/20 11:41, , 3F
原文說遊艇等船隻會將釣魚小船逐出該港但是
08/20 11:41, 3F

08/20 11:42, , 4F
文章開頭說Seatown有一個很大的港口,或許
08/20 11:42, 4F

08/20 11:42, , 5F
在實際上,根本不會壓迫到小船的生存空間
08/20 11:42, 5F

08/20 11:43, , 6F
而為了要提升Seatown的收益,改變或是並容
08/20 11:43, 6F

08/20 11:43, , 7F
兩種類型的船隻會遠比只有釣魚小船好
08/20 11:43, 7F

08/21 00:58, , 8F
此文前後矛盾 漁業已因魚獲量下滑受創
08/21 00:58, 8F

08/21 00:59, , 9F
既需轉型為何要維持大量漁船
08/21 00:59, 9F

08/21 00:59, , 10F
需證據證明漁業仍然是該城財富重要來源
08/21 00:59, 10F

08/21 00:59, , 11F
否則此文無法自圓其說
08/21 00:59, 11F
文章代碼(AID): #18guClfq (GRE)