[問卦] 慟! Amazon《屠殺》三星半已回收

看板Gossiping作者 (補刀)時間6年前 (2018/10/04 21:47), 6年前編輯推噓40(45推 5噓 39→)
留言89則, 67人參與, 6年前最新討論串1/1
本世紀鉅著 The Slaughter: Mass Killings, Organ Harvesting, and China's Secret Solution to Its Dissident Problem 昨天在Amazon網站上還有四星半的高評價 今天就只剩三星半了 一星評價佔了33% 連作者出來留言都挽救不了評價下滑的頹勢 真的沒有人能救他了嗎? 以下隨機選錄數則留言: It could very likely be factual that the Chinese government is illegally taking organs from its people. However, the fact that Mr. Gutmann is willing to lie on tiny details in order to straighten his story and sell his books is unsettling. It does bother me as I realize that he has absolutely no regard to verifiable facts and only aims to acquire fame (and maybe money comes along) when he accused Dr. Wen-je Ko of being actively involved in illegal organ harvest without any physical or circumstantial evidence. Things like illegal organ harvest should definitely be exposed and condemned, but I really hope it's not by Mr Gutmann as his lack of integrity would undermine the credibility of a fact. 29 people found this helpful I believe that humanity issues are very important, and, I applaud the author's effort to expose the (potential) horrible organ harvesting issues in China. I used to respect such effort and believe the contents of the book. However, the author jeopardizes the integrity and trustworthiness of this book in his recent "promotion" event in Taiwan. In this event, the author publicly accused a key witness in the book (Dr. Ko Wen-je) a liar. The author did so without any concrete evidence other than the fact the Dr. Ko taught the Chinese doctors how to use ECMO, a life-saving system. The author even made some wild accusations that ECMO is somehow helpful for organ harvesting, again without proper evidence. I am extremely disappointed by the fact that the author makes serious accusations and/or innuendos without any concrete evidence. The authors' journalist discipline is questionable if the author makes statements without concrete evidence. In addition, if the integrity of a key witness is a "liar", what about the integrity of the book? Organ harvesting is an extremely horrible issue and we should discuss this issue very seriously. The author jeopardizes the credibility of the book by making questions statements. As a believer in humanity issues, I'm very disappointed. It's either the author is a liar or...I personally know his named witness and I believe the author is a liar. The author might have got a great topic but he is just a lousy writer and a totally unprofessional reporter. I do believe in humanity and am against illegal organ harvest. But the "alleged" Nobel Prize Nominee is fully lack of logic. His book is largely about interviewing and investigating, however most of them are from anonymous sources. Dr. Ko is the only named doctor he interviewed and willing to be responsible to his words. Now the author accused Dr. Ko as a liar. If so, then his book is nothing but a pile of hearsay, yet the most trustworthy hearsay is from a liar from the author's words. Hmm.. interesting. How about the credibility of the book? -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 129.89.95.236 ※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1538660856.A.BE6.html
→
10/04 21:47, 6年前 , 1F
\ ( ‵ A ′ )/ 太高了
10/04 21:47, 1F
推
10/04 21:48, 6年前 , 2F
樓下去AMAZON都買甚麼?
10/04 21:48, 2F
→
10/04 21:48, 6年前 , 3F
柯粉最擅長就是洗評價
10/04 21:48, 3F
→
10/04 21:48, 6年前 , 4F
還有三星半？
10/04 21:48, 4F
→
10/04 21:48, 6年前 , 5F
糞作吧
10/04 21:48, 5F
推
10/04 21:48, 6年前 , 6F
大家快去給一星評
10/04 21:48, 6F
推
10/04 21:48, 6年前 , 7F
大部分星星都是買來的XD
10/04 21:48, 7F
→
10/04 21:48, 6年前 , 8F
三星半?? 這代表科粉比八千貓粉絲團還弱
10/04 21:48, 8F
推
10/04 21:48, 6年前 , 9F
沒網址怎麼進攻?
10/04 21:48, 9F
Amazon你還需要網址? 關鍵字: The Slaughter
→
10/04 21:49, 6年前 , 10F
怎麼比8000貓戰力弱
10/04 21:49, 10F
推
10/04 21:50, 6年前 , 11F
☺
10/04 21:50, 11F
※ 編輯: uwmtsa (129.89.95.236), 10/04/2018 21:52:36
推
10/04 21:52, 6年前 , 12F
10/04 21:52, 12F
推
10/04 21:54, 6年前 , 13F
作者留言說什麼
10/04 21:54, 13F
推
10/04 21:56, 6年前 , 14F
寫得評論看起來蠻合理的,葛很難解釋這塊
10/04 21:56, 14F
推
10/04 21:57, 6年前 , 15F
剛開的帳號洗不了評論。洗的都是老用
10/04 21:57, 15F
→
10/04 21:57, 6年前 , 16F
戶了
10/04 21:57, 16F
→
10/04 21:57, 6年前 , 17F
大家出征吧，殺個寸草不生
10/04 21:57, 17F
→
10/04 21:57, 6年前 , 18F
他自己把書中唯一具名的醫師打成騙子
10/04 21:57, 18F
→
10/04 21:58, 6年前 , 19F
那這本書不就科幻小說？一顆星剛好
10/04 21:58, 19F
推
10/04 21:58, 6年前 , 20F
柯粉出征 寸草不生
10/04 21:58, 20F
推
10/04 21:58, 6年前 , 21F
他不願意說明清楚就要為自己的名譽付出代
10/04 21:58, 21F
→
10/04 21:58, 6年前 , 22F
價
10/04 21:58, 22F
推
10/04 22:01, 6年前 , 23F
超級丟臉der 戰力輸中國五毛太多
10/04 22:01, 23F
→
10/04 22:01, 6年前 , 24F
啊 賣得真差 才64個評價
10/04 22:01, 24F
→
10/04 22:03, 6年前 , 25F
台灣人又不是五毛那種廢物還要組織動員
10/04 22:03, 25F
→
10/04 22:06, 6年前 , 26F
評價不值錢 多一個評價多進帳一本
10/04 22:06, 26F
→
10/04 22:06, 6年前 , 27F
看2017/08~2018/09沒評價就知道這賣多差
10/04 22:06, 27F
推
10/04 22:08, 6年前 , 28F
科粉連外國網站都要去洗？
10/04 22:08, 28F
→
10/04 22:08, 6年前 , 29F
中文呢？
10/04 22:08, 29F
中文版出了嗎?
推
10/04 22:08, 6年前 , 30F
寫這種報導性的內容缺乏可信度
10/04 22:08, 30F
→
10/04 22:08, 6年前 , 31F
還稱唯一願意具名的證人為liar不如就叫做小
10/04 22:08, 31F
→
10/04 22:08, 6年前 , 32F
說吧
10/04 22:08, 32F
※ 編輯: uwmtsa (129.89.95.236), 10/04/2018 22:09:37
推
10/04 22:13, 6年前 , 33F
變成3.2顆星了，繼續衝啊～ 讓它變1
10/04 22:13, 33F
推
10/04 22:15, 6年前 , 34F
葛的初衷已經變了
10/04 22:15, 34F
推
10/04 22:15, 6年前 , 35F
3星了
10/04 22:15, 35F
噓
10/04 22:16, 6年前 , 36F
垃圾書
10/04 22:16, 36F
推
10/04 22:18, 6年前 , 37F
北七，洗的評論很快就會被刪了
10/04 22:18, 37F
推
10/04 22:22, 6年前 , 38F
不會
10/04 22:22, 38F
推
10/04 22:24, 6年前 , 39F
柯黑氣呼呼 這柯黑的聖經耶
10/04 22:24, 39F
→
10/04 22:25, 6年前 , 40F
很少有人會這樣攻擊作者的吧…
10/04 22:25, 40F
→
10/04 22:27, 6年前 , 41F
一直以來都是柯粉去惹葛 不會說這次也是
10/04 22:27, 41F
→
10/04 22:27, 6年前 , 42F
柯黑反串吧
10/04 22:27, 42F
推
10/04 22:29, 6年前 , 43F
攻擊？評論對書的質疑非常合理，柯黑是不
10/04 22:29, 43F
→
10/04 22:29, 6年前 , 44F
是看不懂英文評論？
10/04 22:29, 44F
→
10/04 22:29, 6年前 , 45F
他想身敗名裂 我們只是成全他而已
10/04 22:29, 45F
→
10/04 22:30, 6年前 , 46F
誰無聊想鳥他啊，低能？
10/04 22:30, 46F
推
10/04 22:30, 6年前 , 47F
帝吧去的啦,不要亂講
10/04 22:30, 47F
→
10/04 22:30, 6年前 , 48F
都這麼久原來還在賣啊
10/04 22:30, 48F
推
10/04 22:33, 6年前 , 49F
攻擊作者?原PO擷取的都有提出葛的問題
10/04 22:33, 49F
→
10/04 22:33, 6年前 , 50F
我倒還想看作者要怎麼回應這些評論
10/04 22:33, 50F
推
10/04 22:35, 6年前 , 51F
駐美柯粉出征!!
10/04 22:35, 51F
推
10/04 22:38, 6年前 , 52F
不只要洗1星 還要互評一星評論是helpful
10/04 22:38, 52F
噓
10/04 22:45, 6年前 , 53F
白賊神教小胖萊爾教主開示 神教出
10/04 22:45, 53F
→
10/04 22:46, 6年前 , 54F
征 笑到往生
10/04 22:46, 54F
→
10/04 22:51, 6年前 , 55F
看嘸，沒人寫中文
10/04 22:51, 55F
推
10/04 22:55, 6年前 , 56F
一星全點helpful ㄏㄏ
10/04 22:55, 56F
推
10/04 23:03, 6年前 , 57F
好專業的英文
10/04 23:03, 57F
推
10/04 23:08, 6年前 , 58F
攻擊?正當評論叫做攻擊 你沒證據
10/04 23:08, 58F
→
10/04 23:08, 6年前 , 59F
指人活摘器官不是攻擊 柯黑怎不出來護
10/04 23:08, 59F
→
10/04 23:09, 6年前 , 60F
柯 覺得別讓人瞧不起
10/04 23:09, 60F
→
10/04 23:15, 6年前 , 61F
拜託，是本來就很爛好嗎？科黑腦袋呢
10/04 23:15, 61F
→
10/04 23:47, 6年前 , 62F
五毛柯粉出征
10/04 23:47, 62F
推
10/04 23:55, 6年前 , 63F
這跟之前fb反串留言的一比英文真的好多了
10/04 23:55, 63F
推
10/04 23:57, 6年前 , 64F
高調
10/04 23:57, 64F
推
10/04 23:58, 6年前 , 65F
寫得真好。 柯黑就是一群放棄用腦的人
10/04 23:58, 65F
推
10/05 00:44, 6年前 , 66F
難得看到一段英文論說 而不是一句
10/05 00:44, 66F
→
10/05 00:45, 6年前 , 67F
看不懂 可惡 快挑拼字文法錯
10/05 00:45, 67F
推
10/05 00:46, 6年前 , 68F
寫得好
10/05 00:46, 68F
推
10/05 00:53, 6年前 , 69F
哎呀這樣就不能在四星商店上架惹XD
10/05 00:53, 69F
推
10/05 00:59, 6年前 , 70F
太高了吧 引用騙子的訪談譴責中國涉嫌活摘法
10/05 00:59, 70F
→
10/05 00:59, 6年前 , 71F
輪功學員器官 是奇幻小說嗎
10/05 00:59, 71F
推
10/05 01:02, 6年前 , 72F
GOOD BOOK for a science fiction.
10/05 01:02, 72F
推
10/05 01:16, 6年前 , 73F
沒在用亞馬遜的無腦質疑一下子就被打臉
10/05 01:16, 73F
→
10/05 01:17, 6年前 , 74F
了
10/05 01:17, 74F
噓
10/05 01:46, 6年前 , 75F
帝吧出征2.0 丟臉丟到國外
10/05 01:46, 75F
推
10/05 02:19, 6年前 , 76F
樓上丟臉丟到PTT
10/05 02:19, 76F
推
10/05 02:40, 6年前 , 77F
對書的內容有質疑的評論當然可以發吧
10/05 02:40, 77F
→
10/05 02:40, 6年前 , 78F
啊不過如果是科幻小說那就很多餘囉～
10/05 02:40, 78F
噓
10/05 03:09, 6年前 , 79F
一堆柯粉去國外丟人現眼
10/05 03:09, 79F
→
10/05 04:22, 6年前 , 80F
就說柯粉是9.25毛了吧 洗版留負評的方式
10/05 04:22, 80F
→
10/05 04:22, 6年前 , 81F
完全相同
10/05 04:22, 81F
推
10/05 07:13, 6年前 , 82F
看不懂英文只好說別人洗評價，你才是丟
10/05 07:13, 82F
→
10/05 07:13, 6年前 , 83F
臉的垃圾
10/05 07:13, 83F
推
10/05 07:32, 6年前 , 84F
哈 科黑真的好笑
10/05 07:32, 84F
推
10/05 07:45, 6年前 , 85F
柯黑英文不好？不去挺，難怪只會抹屎
10/05 07:45, 85F
推
10/05 09:42, 6年前 , 86F
幹的好
10/05 09:42, 86F
推
10/05 10:30, 6年前 , 87F
好多台灣人==
10/05 10:30, 87F
噓
10/05 12:27, 6年前 , 88F
柯粉跟帝吧的區別在那？
10/05 12:27, 88F
推
10/06 06:33, 6年前 , 89F
跟事實有關，跟什麼粉無關
10/06 06:33, 89F
‣ 更多 uwmtsa 的文章
文章代碼(AID): #1RjXdulc (Gossiping)