[外絮] 林書豪在火箭之一：執行擋拆戰術
譯者：scarletvenus
已徵得譯者同意轉載並修改部分不同慣用語。
原文：
http://www.grantland.com/blog/the-triangle/post/_/id/34654/jeremy-
lin-on-the-rockets-part-i-running-the-pick-and-roll
譯文：
http://bbs.hupu.com/4156011.html
Jeremy Lin on the Rockets Part I: Running the Pick-and-Roll
By Sebastian Pruiti on August 14, 2012 12:40 PM ET
林書豪在火箭之一：執行擋拆戰術
After having Jeremy Lin pre-Linsanity, the Houston Rockets made up for
cutting him before last season by agreeing to pay Lin around $25 million over
the next three years. While that may seem like a lot for a player who had
success for just 36 games as a New York Knick, Lin is coming in as the
presumed starting point guard for the Rockets, ready to prove that those
games weren't a fluke. As it turns out, Houston wanting to make up for their
mistake might be the best thing for Lin, because when looking at the tape and
the numbers, the fit seems pretty good, especially when you look at Lin's
play in pick-and-roll situations, and especially in comparison to how Kyle
Lowry — who ran point for Houston last season and is now on the Raptors —
played in the pick-and-roll last season.
在上個賽季裁掉成名之前林書豪的火箭隊終於用三年兩千五百萬美元的大合約彌
補了自己的錯誤。雖然這合約對於一個只打了36場好球的尼克球員來說是大了點
，但是林書豪作為公認的新賽季火箭隊先發控衛，已經準備好了向世界證明自己
的成功不是僥倖。火箭隊這樣彌補自己的錯誤對於林書豪來說或許是最好的結果
，因為從比賽影片和數據記錄來看，林書豪很適合火箭隊，尤其是當你注意林書
豪打擋拆配合時與Lowry（上賽季火箭隊先發控衛，現在在暴龍隊）的對比。
If there is one play that defined Linsanity, it was the pick-and-roll. Lin
coming off of a screen and finding a way to get all the way to the rim or
hitting a teammate, whether it be the roll man or a player spotting up
outside of the pick-and-roll, for the open shot. The pick-and-roll was a big
part of what made Jeremy Lin successful; as he ran it on 42.5 percent of his
possessions, it's only natural to expect that the Rockets will use Lin in
that way as well. It's not going to be much of a change for the Rockets, who
ran PNRs (10.9 percent of possessions) almost as much as the Knicks (12.9
percent of possessions). When the Rockets do use Lin in pick-and-rolls, they
aren't going to have to change much of their offense because Lin and Lowry
both use ball screens in an almost identical way. Let's start by looking at
where these screens were used.
擋拆是林風暴最大的特徵。林書豪總是在掩護過後殺到籃下或者傳球給正在跑位
或站在外圍空位的隊友來投籃。擋拆是林書豪能夠成功的重要原因。林書豪持球
時42.5％都會選擇打擋拆，所以預計火箭隊也會這麼來用林書豪。這對火箭隊並
不意味著一個很大的改變，因為火箭隊打擋拆（10.9％）的概率不比尼克
（12.9％）低多少。火箭隊並不需要改變太多也是因為林書豪和Lowry利用掩護
的方法幾乎是相同的。讓我們先來看看這些掩護發生的位置。
http://a.espncdn.com/photo/2012/0814/grant_h_pnr_cr_576.jpg
Synergy Sports uses three locations to define where a pick-and-roll takes
place: the left side, the right side, and the top. Comparing Lin and Lowry,
and looking at where they both used ball screens last season, you see that
they favor the same spots (with point guards, a large chunk of your ball
screens are going to be set at the top of the key). Once the screen is set,
the next step is looking at how the ball handler uses the screen. Does he
dribble off the screen or does he go away from the pick?
Synergy Sports 用三個位置來定義擋拆在哪裡發生：左端、右端和頂部。對比
一下林書豪和Lowry，你會發現他們都喜歡相同的位置（控衛經常會在頂弧附近
做掩護）。掩護做好了以後，下一步要看持球者如何利用掩護。他是會利用掩護
還是不用掩護？
http://a.espncdn.com/photo/2012/0814/grant_h_use_cr_576.jpg
Once again, the numbers are pretty similar. Both guys like to use the ball
screen, doing so at a pretty high rate. With that being said, both are
willing to go away from the screen, mixing things up and reading the defense
to take advantage of a defense overplaying them. Once they use the screen,
what do Lin and Lowry do with the basketball? Again, it's pretty similar.
又一次，數據相當相似。兩個人都喜歡利用掩護，概率很高。但是，兩個人也都
願意不利用掩護使對方防守變得混亂以抓住機會。他們利用掩護之後會怎麼處理
球呢？又是很相似。
http://a.espncdn.com/photo/2012/0814/grant_h_pass_cr_576.jpg
Both guys like to look for their shot, but they also like to get their
teammates involved more than they score. The numbers from Synergy Sports show
that. The willingness to defer to teammates in pick-and-roll situations
forces the opponents to be somewhat honest when defending ball screens. When
that happens, you force the defense to start thinking, and this is what
allows a point guard to have success in the pick-and-roll. For the Rockets,
being able to replicate pick-and-rolls in the same fashion Kyle Lowry
executed them is very important. It means the Rockets won't have to change
much of their offense. You can teach Lin the offense and you don't have to
deviate from what you do or what you had success with last year to maximize
Lin's value.
兩個人都喜歡投籃，但是他們卻會優先選擇團隊配合。數據證明了這一點。願意
在擋拆配合過後選擇團隊配合會讓對手在防守時想更多，這也是控衛成功運用擋
拆配合的重要條件。對於火箭隊來說，能夠複製Kyle Lowry式的擋拆配合相當重
要，因為這意味著火箭隊不必大幅改變進攻方式。你會很容易教會林書豪這樣的
進攻方法，而不必改變去年的進攻方式來充分利用林書豪的能力。
Is Lin an upgrade from Lowry? It's tough to say. According to the numbers,
Lowry was one of the best scorers in pick-and-roll situations, posting a PPP
of 0.969, placing him in the top 10 percent of all NBA players. Lin's PPP?
0.797. Still above average, that PPP places him in the 63rd percentile, but
not as good. However, when you look at each player's use of all ball screens,
including pass-out situations, things get a lot closer. Lowry's total
pick-and-roll PPP (including both scoring and pass-out situations) was 0.919,
placing him in the 63rd percentile. Lin's was 0.893, placing him in the 53rd
percentile.
林書豪相比於Lowry更好嗎？是個很難的問題。數據方面，Lowry是擋拆配合中得
分能力最強的球員之一，每次能拿0.969分，在所有NBA球員中排進前10％。林書
豪每次能拿0.797分，雖然高過平均值，但是只能排在前37％，不如Lowry好。但
是當你看所有擋拆配合時（包括傳球給隊友的情況），對於Lowry來講每次擋拆配
合平均為隊拿到0.919分，能夠排進聯盟前37％，而林書豪是每次0.893分，排在
聯盟前47％，差距縮小很多。
What makes Lin so successful in the pick-and-roll? It's his ability to keep
the defense honest by mixing things up. He simply takes what the defense
gives him.
是什麼能讓林書豪的擋拆配合如此成功？是他能夠打亂對方防守的能力。他很會
利用對方的防守。
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=1dTSU_hLixQ
Lin doesn't force things. If he doesn't have a lane in pick-and-roll
situations, he knows that he should have a teammate open and works to try to
get them the ball. In addition to that, he keeps his dribble alive, forcing
the defense (especially the hedging big) to stretch out, prompting a tough
decision: Either the big continues to hedge and he leaves his man open, or he
returns to his man and creates a scoring opportunity for Lin. Now, Lin did
struggle with turnovers, especially when being blitzed, giving up the ball on
about 26 percent of possessions, but I think those numbers will naturally
improve. This will be the first camp that Lin comes into as a starter. He's
going to get starter reps in practice, and he's going to be much more
comfortable with how defense will attempt to stop him. If he can get that
turnover rate down to the 15 to 10 percent range, Lin's efficiency will only
improve. This means that when Houston runs pick-and-rolls next season, the
sets will look quite similar to last year's sets. That's a good thing — and
with Lin's decision making, the Rockets should have success in the
pick-and-roll next year.
林書豪不會硬上。如果擋拆之後突不進內線，他知道一定會有一名隊友無人防守
，那他就會想方設法把球傳過去。另外，他也會運球尋找機會，把對方的大個子
引出來。大個子陷入了困境：他是要擋林書豪放掉自己本該防守的球員還是回去
防守自己的人而讓林書豪有射籃的機會？現在林書豪確實還在與失誤抗爭，尤其
是對方突襲時，有26％機率會丟球，但是我覺得這方面自然而然會進步。這將是
林書豪以先發姿態加入的第一個陣容。他會在訓練中穿上先發隊服，他會更得心
應手地應對針對他的防守。如果他能夠降低失誤率到15到10％之間，林的效率只
會提高。這意味著休士頓下賽季執行擋拆時，將會與上賽季非常相似。這是件好
事：擁有林書豪的決策能力，火箭隊下賽季的擋拆配合應該會相當成功。
--
作者為NBDL助理教練
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 118.169.45.67
推
08/16 13:52, , 1F
08/16 13:52, 1F
→
08/16 13:53, , 2F
08/16 13:53, 2F
→
08/16 13:54, , 3F
08/16 13:54, 3F
→
08/16 13:55, , 4F
08/16 13:55, 4F
→
08/16 13:56, , 5F
08/16 13:56, 5F
推
08/16 13:56, , 6F
08/16 13:56, 6F
→
08/16 13:56, , 7F
08/16 13:56, 7F
→
08/16 13:57, , 8F
08/16 13:57, 8F
推
08/16 13:58, , 9F
08/16 13:58, 9F
推
08/16 13:59, , 10F
08/16 13:59, 10F
→
08/16 13:59, , 11F
08/16 13:59, 11F
→
08/16 14:00, , 12F
08/16 14:00, 12F
→
08/16 14:01, , 13F
08/16 14:01, 13F
推
08/16 14:01, , 14F
08/16 14:01, 14F
推
08/16 14:02, , 15F
08/16 14:02, 15F
→
08/16 14:02, , 16F
08/16 14:02, 16F
推
08/16 14:04, , 17F
08/16 14:04, 17F
推
08/16 14:05, , 18F
08/16 14:05, 18F
推
08/16 14:05, , 19F
08/16 14:05, 19F
→
08/16 14:05, , 20F
08/16 14:05, 20F
→
08/16 14:05, , 21F
08/16 14:05, 21F
→
08/16 14:06, , 22F
08/16 14:06, 22F
→
08/16 14:07, , 23F
08/16 14:07, 23F
推
08/16 14:07, , 24F
08/16 14:07, 24F
推
08/16 14:08, , 25F
08/16 14:08, 25F
→
08/16 14:08, , 26F
08/16 14:08, 26F
推
08/16 14:09, , 27F
08/16 14:09, 27F
→
08/16 14:09, , 28F
08/16 14:09, 28F
推
08/16 14:10, , 29F
08/16 14:10, 29F
推
08/16 14:12, , 30F
08/16 14:12, 30F
→
08/16 14:12, , 31F
08/16 14:12, 31F
推
08/16 14:14, , 32F
08/16 14:14, 32F
推
08/16 14:18, , 33F
08/16 14:18, 33F
推
08/16 14:20, , 34F
08/16 14:20, 34F
推
08/16 14:20, , 35F
08/16 14:20, 35F
→
08/16 14:21, , 36F
08/16 14:21, 36F
推
08/16 14:37, , 37F
08/16 14:37, 37F
→
08/16 14:38, , 38F
08/16 14:38, 38F
→
08/16 14:41, , 39F
08/16 14:41, 39F
→
08/16 14:42, , 40F
08/16 14:42, 40F
推
08/16 14:44, , 41F
08/16 14:44, 41F
→
08/16 14:44, , 42F
08/16 14:44, 42F
→
08/16 14:45, , 43F
08/16 14:45, 43F
推
08/16 14:48, , 44F
08/16 14:48, 44F
→
08/16 14:49, , 45F
08/16 14:49, 45F
推
08/16 14:55, , 46F
08/16 14:55, 46F
推
08/16 14:55, , 47F
08/16 14:55, 47F
推
08/16 14:56, , 48F
08/16 14:56, 48F
→
08/16 14:56, , 49F
08/16 14:56, 49F
→
08/16 14:56, , 50F
08/16 14:56, 50F
→
08/16 14:57, , 51F
08/16 14:57, 51F
→
08/16 14:57, , 52F
08/16 14:57, 52F
推
08/16 15:01, , 53F
08/16 15:01, 53F
→
08/16 15:02, , 54F
08/16 15:02, 54F
→
08/16 15:02, , 55F
08/16 15:02, 55F
推
08/16 15:09, , 56F
08/16 15:09, 56F
推
08/16 15:10, , 57F
08/16 15:10, 57F
推
08/16 15:23, , 58F
08/16 15:23, 58F
推
08/16 15:34, , 59F
08/16 15:34, 59F
推
08/16 15:40, , 60F
08/16 15:40, 60F
→
08/16 15:42, , 61F
08/16 15:42, 61F
→
08/16 15:43, , 62F
08/16 15:43, 62F
推
08/16 15:46, , 63F
08/16 15:46, 63F
推
08/16 15:46, , 64F
08/16 15:46, 64F
※ 編輯: shadowydark 來自: 118.169.45.67 (08/16 15:52)
推
08/16 16:37, , 65F
08/16 16:37, 65F
→
08/16 16:43, , 66F
08/16 16:43, 66F
推
08/16 16:48, , 67F
08/16 16:48, 67F
推
08/16 17:05, , 68F
08/16 17:05, 68F
推
08/16 17:22, , 69F
08/16 17:22, 69F
推
08/16 17:40, , 70F
08/16 17:40, 70F
→
08/16 17:41, , 71F
08/16 17:41, 71F
推
08/16 18:08, , 72F
08/16 18:08, 72F
→
08/16 18:09, , 73F
08/16 18:09, 73F
→
08/16 18:11, , 74F
08/16 18:11, 74F
推
08/16 18:22, , 75F
08/16 18:22, 75F
→
08/16 18:23, , 76F
08/16 18:23, 76F
推
08/16 20:45, , 77F
08/16 20:45, 77F
推
08/16 21:07, , 78F
08/16 21:07, 78F
→
08/16 21:07, , 79F
08/16 21:07, 79F
→
08/16 21:08, , 80F
08/16 21:08, 80F
推
08/16 21:23, , 81F
08/16 21:23, 81F
→
08/16 21:23, , 82F
08/16 21:23, 82F
推
08/16 21:42, , 83F
08/16 21:42, 83F
推
08/16 22:02, , 84F
08/16 22:02, 84F
推
08/16 22:30, , 85F
08/16 22:30, 85F
→
08/16 22:30, , 86F
08/16 22:30, 86F
推
08/17 00:25, , 87F
08/17 00:25, 87F
推
08/17 00:26, , 88F
08/17 00:26, 88F
推
08/17 09:26, , 89F
08/17 09:26, 89F
→
08/17 09:27, , 90F
08/17 09:27, 90F
推
08/18 01:18, , 91F
08/18 01:18, 91F
→
08/18 01:19, , 92F
08/18 01:19, 92F
→
08/18 01:20, , 93F
08/18 01:20, 93F