[閒聊] 看了一篇知識家的文章,想跟各位討論
http://tw.knowledge.yahoo.com/question/question?qid=1510092500721
這篇發問的提問者
我想他的本意是想把傳武發揚光大
否則不會提這種發問
可是回答的第一個網友
他的回答實在讓我無言
我不能接受他所謂"參加有國際認證性質的比賽=耍猴戲"
如果此一網友真有他所謂的"武德"
連尊重別人比賽的意願都做不到?
比賽=耍猴戲?
再來看他所謂的"實績"
我簡直快笑死
請看:
實績嘛!假如散打選手能把對手打飛一公尺以上,而能不傷對方分毫,不知能有幾個能自
信100%做到?
這僅僅是小弟未成年之時的水準,也許在許多老前輩眼前是十分丟臉的水準。
小弟不才
沒有學過所謂的"打飛一公尺而不傷人"
不過我只知道
以拳擊來說代表你這拳打壞了
小弟光是要練習"把力滲透"都還不敢說已經達到
打出去的物體,如果會向後飛,代表的是力量已經透出了
真正的高段,是要掌握住對手停頓點,並且"點擊"把力量停留在對方體內
一來這樣才有傳導,才算是有拳拳到肉。
二來對方才不會"被你擊飛",使你下次出手追擊困難。
連所謂"只為了耍猴戲的拳擊"都懂這個道理
實在不懂那位網友在那邊為了打一拳"沒什麼傷害力的拳"
(因為不懂施力結構,一般大眾都偏向打這種拳)
在那裡沾沾自喜...
難怪傳統武術一直上不去世界殿堂....
--
http://www.facebook.com/#!/profile.php?id=100000797812887
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 61.64.176.151
→
09/30 07:05, , 1F
09/30 07:05, 1F
推
09/30 08:15, , 2F
09/30 08:15, 2F
推
09/30 08:19, , 3F
09/30 08:19, 3F
→
09/30 08:20, , 4F
09/30 08:20, 4F
推
09/30 08:55, , 5F
09/30 08:55, 5F
推
09/30 09:00, , 6F
09/30 09:00, 6F
推
09/30 10:28, , 7F
09/30 10:28, 7F
推
09/30 10:57, , 8F
09/30 10:57, 8F
噓
09/30 11:30, , 9F
09/30 11:30, 9F
→
09/30 11:32, , 10F
09/30 11:32, 10F
推
09/30 11:49, , 11F
09/30 11:49, 11F
→
09/30 11:50, , 12F
09/30 11:50, 12F
→
09/30 11:51, , 13F
09/30 11:51, 13F
推
09/30 12:53, , 14F
09/30 12:53, 14F
→
09/30 13:10, , 15F
09/30 13:10, 15F
→
09/30 13:13, , 16F
09/30 13:13, 16F
→
09/30 13:13, , 17F
09/30 13:13, 17F
→
09/30 13:14, , 18F
09/30 13:14, 18F
噓
09/30 13:41, , 19F
09/30 13:41, 19F
→
09/30 18:06, , 20F
09/30 18:06, 20F
→
09/30 18:07, , 21F
09/30 18:07, 21F
推
09/30 19:47, , 22F
09/30 19:47, 22F
→
09/30 19:48, , 23F
09/30 19:48, 23F
→
09/30 19:48, , 24F
09/30 19:48, 24F
推
10/01 00:28, , 25F
10/01 00:28, 25F
→
10/01 01:35, , 26F
10/01 01:35, 26F
推
10/01 09:40, , 27F
10/01 09:40, 27F
推
10/01 10:40, , 28F
10/01 10:40, 28F
→
10/01 10:40, , 29F
10/01 10:40, 29F
→
10/01 10:41, , 30F
10/01 10:41, 30F
→
10/01 10:42, , 31F
10/01 10:42, 31F
推
10/01 13:38, , 32F
10/01 13:38, 32F
推
10/01 14:14, , 33F
10/01 14:14, 33F
→
10/01 16:01, , 34F
10/01 16:01, 34F
推
10/01 17:10, , 35F
10/01 17:10, 35F
推
10/01 23:36, , 36F
10/01 23:36, 36F
→
10/02 00:03, , 37F
10/02 00:03, 37F
推
10/02 00:11, , 38F
10/02 00:11, 38F
→
10/02 00:11, , 39F
10/02 00:11, 39F
推
10/02 00:33, , 40F
10/02 00:33, 40F
推
10/02 00:47, , 41F
10/02 00:47, 41F
→
10/02 00:47, , 42F
10/02 00:47, 42F
推
10/02 00:49, , 43F
10/02 00:49, 43F
→
10/02 00:51, , 44F
10/02 00:51, 44F
→
10/02 00:51, , 45F
10/02 00:51, 45F
推
10/02 00:54, , 46F
10/02 00:54, 46F
→
10/02 00:54, , 47F
10/02 00:54, 47F
推
10/02 01:01, , 48F
10/02 01:01, 48F
→
10/02 01:02, , 49F
10/02 01:02, 49F
推
10/02 06:15, , 50F
10/02 06:15, 50F
→
10/02 06:16, , 51F
10/02 06:16, 51F
→
12/06 04:18, , 52F
12/06 04:18, 52F
→
12/06 04:18, , 53F
12/06 04:18, 53F