[外電] 年度最佳新秀候選人三號 -- Chris Paul
※ [本文轉錄自 Hornets 看板]
作者: kerrys (台北不是我的家) 看板: Hornets
標題: [外電] 年度最佳新秀候選人三號 -- Chris Paul
時間: Wed Apr 19 16:48:20 2006
原文出處:
http://www.nba.com/awards2006/thecase_rookie_paul.html
--
2005-06:
Named Western Conference Rookie of the Month for November, December, January,
February and March ... Leads all rookies in minutes (36.3), points (16.3),
assists (7.9), steals (2.24), assist/turnover ratio (2.3), double-doubles (21)
and efficiency (21.5) ... Is the only rookie to record a triple-double this
season, and did it twice in four days (04/02 at TOR and 04/05 vs. GSW) ...
Ranks third in the NBA in steals, seventh in assists and sixth in
assist/turnover ratio ... Is currently ranked No. 1 in NBA.com's Rookie
Rankings.
'05-'06年球季:
獲選為11、12、1、2、3月西區當月最佳新秀(譯按:相信4月份也是他獲選,乾脆直接
宣佈他當選ROY不是比較快 XDDD)...平均上場時間(36.2分)、單場平均得分(16.2分)、助
攻(7.8次)、抄截(2.25次)、助攻/失誤比(2.3)、單場兩個雙位數(21次)及效率值(21.39)
等個人攻守數據皆名列所有新秀之冠...本季唯一一季曾經創下大三元的新秀球員,而且四
天內二度大三元(4/2造訪多倫多以及4/5在主場迎戰金州勇士)...單場平均抄截排在聯盟第
三、平均助攻排名第七,助攻/失誤比(3.36)則排名第六...在目前NBA官網的新秀評比排名
第一(譯按:從頭到尾都是第一不是? <(_ _)>)。
--
Our take:
You can talk about the stats all you want. They speak for themselves. The most
important thing about what Chris Paul has done this season doesn't have
anything to do with stats though. He came in as a rookie, to a team that was
forced to move 700 miles from home just before preseason started, and led them
to more than twice as many wins as they had last season. And he did it at the
point guard position, asked to lead a group of guys that had a lot more
experience than he did.
-- John Schuhmann
我們的看法:
你可以談論任何你想得到的數據,數字會說話,不過最重要的是就算不去看數據,你
也能輕易了解C.Paul本季的表現有多出色。身為一個菜鳥球員,加入一支季前熱身賽前被
迫遷移至距離主場700哩遠的球隊,並帶領這支落難黃蜂贏得與上個球季相比至少兩倍以上
的勝場數。而且他是以一介菜鳥控衛之姿,被球隊要求去帶領一群NBA經驗遠勝過於自己的
球員,這才是他真正厲害的地方。
--
From the media:
Learning the point guard position on this level is usually a three- or
four-year process. That's how it was for Nash, John Stockton, and many others.
But this kid walked into the NBA like he owned it, resurrected a dead franchise
, and he's all over the league-leader lists ... When he adds a 3-pointer, he'll
be indefensible.
-- Dave D'Alessandro, Newark Star-Ledger
媒體的看法:
要成為這種等級的控衛通常需要三到四年的養成時間,那是由S.Nash、老史及其他出
色控衛身上所歸納出來的結論。不過我們完全看不出來這個小朋友是個菜鳥球員,他好像
原本就屬於這裡。他成功拯救了一支幾乎萬念俱灰的球隊,多項個人功守數據也盤據在聯
盟前幾名的位置....一旦他增加了三分球這項武器,他將會讓對手防不勝防。
--節錄自N.J.com Star-Ledger專欄作家D.D'Alessandro所做的評論
(網址如右所附:http://0rz.net/511fT)
--
A fan's take:
Not forgetting the fact that he averages almost 17 points per game and eight
assists, I really like to see his leadership on the court. As a rookie, he
already has the respect of his teammates and has exhibited leadership qualities
that has allowed him to take the NO/Oklahoma City Hornets to the next level.
Come on, I never expected them to be in playoff contention. He is already a
valuable player in the NBA in my book. He deserves it.
-- Rachael - Brooklyn, N.Y.
球迷的看法:
不要忘了他一場比賽平均將近有17分和8次助攻的表現,我真的很喜歡看到他在場上展
現的領袖風範。雖然只是一個新秀,但他已經順利贏得隊友的敬重也已經展現了能將黃蜂
帶到另一個更高境界的領導能力。拜託~開季前我根本沒期待他們能跟季後賽沾上一點邊
好嗎?在我心中,他在NBA已經是一個舉足輕重的重要人物了,他確實該獲得這個獎的肯定
。
--來自紐約布魯克林的球迷Rachael
--
The Numbers:(本季個人攻守數據)
G MPG PPG RPG APG SPG BPG FG% 3P% FT%
2005-06 77 36.2 16.2 5.2 7.8 2.25 0.08 .431 .282 .847
--
Rookie of the Year - The Candidates:
本季年度最佳新秀候選人:
Andrew Bogut - Milwaukee Bucks
Raymond Felton - Charlotte Bobcats
Chris Paul - New Orleans/Oklahoma City Hornets
Charlie Villanueva - Toronto Raptors
--
Others worth consideration:
本季表現出色的新秀還有:
Channing Frye, Ryan Gomes, Danny Granger, Deron Williams
--
譯按:上述一些數據及描述和原本外電所寫有些出入,因為我用截至目前為止NBA官網最近
一次更新後的數據下去寫。
順道附上Paul的個人攻守數據網頁:
http://www.nba.com/playerfile/chris_paul/index.html
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 210.241.111.125
推
04/19 19:04,
04/19 19:04
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 210.241.111.125
推
04/19 20:18, , 1F
04/19 20:18, 1F
推
04/19 20:24, , 2F
04/19 20:24, 2F
推
04/19 20:26, , 3F
04/19 20:26, 3F
推
04/19 20:38, , 4F
04/19 20:38, 4F
推
04/19 20:39, , 5F
04/19 20:39, 5F
推
04/19 20:39, , 6F
04/19 20:39, 6F
→
04/19 20:41, , 7F
04/19 20:41, 7F
→
04/19 20:42, , 8F
04/19 20:42, 8F
推
04/19 20:47, , 9F
04/19 20:47, 9F
推
04/19 20:49, , 10F
04/19 20:49, 10F
推
04/19 21:06, , 11F
04/19 21:06, 11F
→
04/19 21:13, , 12F
04/19 21:13, 12F
→
04/19 21:23, , 13F
04/19 21:23, 13F
推
04/19 21:45, , 14F
04/19 21:45, 14F
推
04/19 21:51, , 15F
04/19 21:51, 15F
推
04/19 22:24, , 16F
04/19 22:24, 16F
推
04/19 22:27, , 17F
04/19 22:27, 17F
推
04/19 22:53, , 18F
04/19 22:53, 18F
推
04/19 22:58, , 19F
04/19 22:58, 19F
→
04/19 22:58, , 20F
04/19 22:58, 20F
推
04/19 23:10, , 21F
04/19 23:10, 21F
→
04/19 23:29, , 22F
04/19 23:29, 22F
推
04/19 23:31, , 23F
04/19 23:31, 23F
推
04/19 23:52, , 24F
04/19 23:52, 24F
→
04/19 23:56, , 25F
04/19 23:56, 25F
推
04/20 01:21, , 26F
04/20 01:21, 26F
推
04/20 03:24, , 27F
04/20 03:24, 27F
推
04/20 09:39, , 28F
04/20 09:39, 28F
推
04/20 09:46, , 29F
04/20 09:46, 29F
推
04/20 19:49, , 30F
04/20 19:49, 30F