Re: [Wang] 2009 Rotation: Chien-Ming Wang
※ 引述《Belladonaa ()》之銘言:
:
: http://0rz.tw/kT8tB
: Previewing the New York Yankees' 2009 Rotation: Chien-Ming Wang
: After this offseason was complete with CC Sabathia and A.J. Burnett many
: thought those two were Yankees' manager Joe Girardi's one and two in the
: rotation. But, Chien-Ming Wang has been one of the most stable pitchers in the
: league since joining the Yanks in 2006.
去年季末補進了CC跟AJ後,很多人認為這兩位投手將會是洋基的1.2號先發。但自從老王在
06年加入洋基輪值後,他一直都是聯盟中最穩定的投手之一。
: Wang, last year's ace, will be Girardi's number two this year heading into the
: 2009 season and it's a place where Wang can flourish because of his
: high-groundball rate and his ability to pitch deep into ball games.
老王將在新球季擔任2號先發的責任,他有很高的滾球率以及可以在比賽中投長局數的能力
: Let's examine how Wang matches up against other number twos around the league.
: In this study I will use a three-year time span for Tampa Bay's James Shields,
: Boston's Daisuke Matsuzaka, and Blue Jays' No. 2 pitcher from last year, and
: current Yankee pitcher A.J. Burnett in comparison to Chien-Ming Wang.
現在把老王跟東區這些二號投手三年內的成績做個比較
1.光芒聖盾:James Shields
2.紅襪牛肉:Daisuke Matsuzaka
3.藍鳥前二號:A.J. Burnett
: The stat set we will use is Innings Pitched (IP), W-L Record, Strikeouts (K),
: Walks (BB), ERA, ERA+, WHIP, Strikeouts per 9 innings (K/9), percentage of
: batted balls that were groundballs (GB%), and groundball to flyball ratio
: (GB/FB).
比較的數據有:IP、勝率、K、BB、ERA、ERA+、WHIP、K/9值、滾球%以及滾飛比。
: Since 2006, Wang has led these four pitchers in GB% (58.7), GB/FB (2.67) by a
: very wide margin. Burnett in those same categories comes in at 51.3% GB and
: 1.69 GB/FB which makes sense since they are both sinker ball pitchers.
: Dice-K lives on the edge with an abysmal 38.5% GB and 0.89 GB/FB.
老王在滾球%以及滾飛比中遙遙領先。
: Wang also leads this group with a 46-15 record in three seasons, while pitching
: 512.1 innings and sporting a 3.80 ERA. He also holds the the second-best ERA+
: out of the group at 118, only Dice-K is better at 126.
在勝率方面老王的46-15也領先,他這三年投了512.1IP以及平均3.8的ERA,在ERA+部份
老王的ERA+118只輸給松阪的126。
: Where Wang struggles is his WHIP and K/9 as they are 1.305 and 4.32,
: respectively. Shields owns the best WHIP at 1.199 while Burnett takes the best
: K/9 at 8.93, averaging almost a strikeout per inning.
在WHIP和K/9這個項目老王則是以1.305和4.32落後,這兩個項目由Shields的WHIP1.199和
AJ的K/9值8.93取得領先。
: In case you were wondering the full gamut of stats used, I will outline each
: pitcher for you. BOLD indicates leader in that particular category.
以下是比較資料
: James Shields
: IP: 554.2
: W-L: 32-24
: K: 448
: BB: 114
: ERA: 4.08
: ERA+: 112.3
: WHIP: 1.199
: K/9: 7.30
: GB%: 44.4
: GB/FB: 1.18
: A.J. Burnett
: IP: 521.5
: W-L: 38-26
: K: 525
: BB: 191
: ERA: 3.93
: ERA+: 109.6
: WHIP: 1.279
: K/9: 8.93
: GB%: 51.3
: GB/FB: 1.69
: Daisuke Matsuzaka (松阪只有兩年)
: IP: 372
: W-L: 33-15
: K: 355
: BB: 174
: ERA: 3.72
: ERA+: 126
: WHIP: 1.324
: K/9: 8.58
: GB%: 38.5
: GB/FB: 0.89
: K: 234
: Chien-Ming Wang
: IP: 512.1
: W-L: 46-15
: K: 234
: BB: 148
: ERA: 3.80
: ERA+: 118
: WHIP: 1.305
: K/9: 4.32
: GB%: 58.7
: GB/FB: 2.67
: From this stat set, we can conclude that Wang fits in as a pretty dominate No.
: 2 pitcher in the Yankees rotation. Surprisingly, A.J. would make a great No. 2
: pitcher also and gives the Yankees options.
從以上比較中我們可以評斷出老王在洋基的Rotation中是個非常好的2號先發,AJ也是。
: Girardi can put two power pitchers at the top of his rotation in CC and A.J.
: who will give them high strikeout and decent groundball rates. Conversely, he
: can put a power pitcher and a finesse pitcher back-to-back who will give them
: decent strikeout rates but better groundball rate.
阿吉可以放兩個Power pitcher在輪值的前段,他們可以製造很多的K和還不錯的滾球率,
不過也可以放一個finesse pitcher在中間,他可以給你不錯的K值和很棒的滾球率。
: This is a good problem for the Yankees to have, unlike last year. After doing
: this little study I'm convinced that the AL East has the best No. 2 pitchers
: in the entire league, hands down.
這對洋基來說是個好問題,在這些比較後,我確定美東地區有全大聯盟最好的2號投手們
(金鶯:可以讓我也一起玩嗎?)
Next time, I will cover A.J. Burnett and his place within the Yankees rotation.
下一次,我則會分析AJ在洋基中的定位。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 140.115.207.43
※ 編輯: OoyaoO 來自: 140.115.207.43 (03/02 16:18)
→
03/02 16:19, , 1F
03/02 16:19, 1F
推
03/02 16:19, , 2F
03/02 16:19, 2F
※ 編輯: OoyaoO 來自: 140.115.207.43 (03/02 16:20)
※ 編輯: OoyaoO 來自: 140.115.207.43 (03/02 16:22)
→
03/02 16:25, , 3F
03/02 16:25, 3F
推
03/02 16:30, , 4F
03/02 16:30, 4F
→
03/02 16:31, , 5F
03/02 16:31, 5F
→
03/02 16:31, , 6F
03/02 16:31, 6F
推
03/02 16:59, , 7F
03/02 16:59, 7F
推
03/02 17:00, , 8F
03/02 17:00, 8F
推
03/02 17:00, , 9F
03/02 17:00, 9F
推
03/02 17:01, , 10F
03/02 17:01, 10F
→
03/02 17:01, , 11F
03/02 17:01, 11F
→
03/02 17:02, , 12F
03/02 17:02, 12F
→
03/02 17:11, , 13F
03/02 17:11, 13F
推
03/02 17:19, , 14F
03/02 17:19, 14F
推
03/02 17:33, , 15F
03/02 17:33, 15F
推
03/02 17:38, , 16F
03/02 17:38, 16F
→
03/02 17:39, , 17F
03/02 17:39, 17F
→
03/02 17:40, , 18F
03/02 17:40, 18F
→
03/02 18:25, , 19F
03/02 18:25, 19F
→
03/02 19:55, , 20F
03/02 19:55, 20F
推
03/02 20:04, , 21F
03/02 20:04, 21F
→
03/02 20:05, , 22F
03/02 20:05, 22F
推
03/02 20:16, , 23F
03/02 20:16, 23F
推
03/02 20:54, , 24F
03/02 20:54, 24F
推
03/02 21:08, , 25F
03/02 21:08, 25F
推
03/03 00:37, , 26F
03/03 00:37, 26F
推
03/03 02:35, , 27F
03/03 02:35, 27F
推
03/03 15:28, , 28F
03/03 15:28, 28F
推
03/03 20:15, , 29F
03/03 20:15, 29F