[消費] 因為塑化劑,所以告XX公司的可行性???
事實經過：
若有人飲用了很多XX企業出的蘆筍汁,當中已經被檢驗出有DEHP,
這是事實,請XX的律師團不用急著告我
但我身體雖無不適,但個人認為XX公司雖然在此事件中也算是受害者
或者可稱為是善意第三人?
但XX集團既然將蘆筍汁商業化,就必須做好原料及產品安全衛生之把關原則
但現今竟然被驗出含有2B級致癌物
問題：
請問是否能提出民事訴訟,要求政府代位求償?
純粹對此法律問題感到好奇,請高手解答
先不論所謂的小蝦米對大鯨魚或者曠時廢日的問題
純粹就法律層面而言是否可行?
謝謝
先感謝各位幫 小弟/小妹 解惑或提出建議，如內容尚有不足，盼請提出需補充之處。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 220.128.224.66
※ 編輯: LKO 來自: 220.128.224.66 (05/31 16:22)
※ LKO:轉錄至看板 LAW 05/31 16:25
推
05/31 16:25, , 1F
05/31 16:25, 1F
→
05/31 16:28, , 2F
05/31 16:28, 2F
→
05/31 16:28, , 3F
05/31 16:28, 3F
→
05/31 16:29, , 4F
05/31 16:29, 4F
推
05/31 16:32, , 5F
05/31 16:32, 5F
→
05/31 16:40, , 6F
05/31 16:40, 6F
推
05/31 16:45, , 7F
05/31 16:45, 7F
→
05/31 16:45, , 8F
05/31 16:45, 8F
推
05/31 16:46, , 9F
05/31 16:46, 9F
推
05/31 16:49, , 10F
05/31 16:49, 10F
→
05/31 16:50, , 11F
05/31 16:50, 11F
→
05/31 16:50, , 12F
05/31 16:50, 12F
→
05/31 16:51, , 13F
05/31 16:51, 13F
→
05/31 16:52, , 14F
05/31 16:52, 14F
→
05/31 16:52, , 15F
05/31 16:52, 15F
→
05/31 16:54, , 16F
05/31 16:54, 16F
→
05/31 16:55, , 17F
05/31 16:55, 17F
→
05/31 17:21, , 18F
05/31 17:21, 18F
→
05/31 17:22, , 19F
05/31 17:22, 19F
→
05/31 17:22, , 20F
05/31 17:22, 20F
→
05/31 20:24, , 21F
05/31 20:24, 21F
推
05/31 22:02, , 22F
05/31 22:02, 22F
推
05/31 22:18, , 23F
05/31 22:18, 23F
→
08/11 04:53, , 24F
08/11 04:53, 24F
→
09/12 19:13, , 25F
09/12 19:13, 25F
→
11/01 20:08,
5年前
, 26F
11/01 20:08, 26F