Fw: [文法] It is ... Ving

看板Teacher作者ostracize (bucolic)時間1年前 (2022/11/06 17:17)推噓3(3推 0噓 4→)

留言7則, 3人參與討論串1/1

https://forum.english.best/t/it-is-to-v-ving/50930 有一件事情我始終不明白。 1. To V ... 2. Ving ... 3. It is ... to V ... 4. It is ... Ving ... 台灣的中學英文只教1, 2, 3的用法。 4不但不教，還有老師把它列為錯誤的誘答選項。 https://forum.wordreference.com/threads/it-is-adjective-to-v-or-ving.3897776/ #4 is acceptable. In fact, the least acceptable is #1. While it is grammatically sound, it feels awkward and unidiomatic. We generally only use that syntax in formal and very literary contexts. -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 111.240.105.91 (臺灣) ※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Eng-Class/M.1667722239.A.895.html

推

11/06 19:25, 1年前 , 1^F

11/06 19:25, 1^F

推

11/07 18:17, 1年前 , 2^F

11/07 18:17, 2^F

推

11/07 20:17, 1年前 , 3^F

11/07 20:17, 3^F