[討論] 女法官不懂軍審?
醫聲論壇的文章
http://ppt.cc/FrRK
女法官不懂軍審?賴浩敏:可克服
.中時電子報作者: 李忠一╱宜蘭報導 | 中時電子報 – 2013年8月13日 上午5:30.
中國時報【李忠一╱宜蘭報導】
洪仲丘案促成《軍事審判法》修法,原軍事偵審案件回歸一般司法機關追訴審判,但外界
質疑「女法官連軍人階級都看不懂,怎麼判?」目前司法院傾向第一年不分配給女法官審
理,但恐引起男法官有勞逸不均的反彈聲浪。
昨日司法院長賴浩敏訪視宜蘭地方法院,宜蘭地院院長劉壽嵩對媒體表示,屬於軍法會移
到一般司法機關計有403件,其中高院最多,宜蘭地院有2件,對宜蘭地院人力來說,影響
不大。
劉壽嵩指出,部分法院案件量較多,如洪仲丘案移到桃園地院,桃園地院法官可能心裡會
想,已經那麼繁忙,抽到洪案的法官在人力、工作上恐怕會有很大的問題。
他表示,外界也有人講說,女法官沒當過兵,可能連軍人階級、任務編組都看不懂,又該
如何審理?司法院已經開辦有關軍法的課程研習,目前傾向原軍審案件第一年不分給女法
官。
劉壽嵩表示,但有的法院、法官案件多,男法官可能會質疑「憑什麼女生不用辦?」他坦
言,現在法官喜歡辦民事案件,因為刑事複雜、事多,「容易被非常上訴,又容易被罵恐
龍,高風險行業啊!」再加上軍方的案件,在內部事務分配上「到底誰來辦刑事?」
賴浩敏表示,對於憲法跟法律所賦予的審判業務,司法院一定要盡力做好,不過前提是要
有配套,特別是人力、物力要有適當的配合,軍審法速修有其原因,司法院會全力配合,
「不能說沒有難度,但執行面應該沒什麼問題。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 140.112.125.216
噓
08/13 12:04, , 1F
08/13 12:04, 1F
噓
08/13 14:40, , 2F
08/13 14:40, 2F
→
08/13 14:41, , 3F
08/13 14:41, 3F
→
08/13 14:42, , 4F
08/13 14:42, 4F
→
08/13 14:43, , 5F
08/13 14:43, 5F
→
08/13 15:13, , 6F
08/13 15:13, 6F
→
08/13 15:13, , 7F
08/13 15:13, 7F
噓
08/13 15:16, , 8F
08/13 15:16, 8F
→
08/13 15:16, , 9F
08/13 15:16, 9F
→
08/13 15:20, , 10F
08/13 15:20, 10F
→
08/13 15:22, , 11F
08/13 15:22, 11F
→
08/13 15:23, , 12F
08/13 15:23, 12F
推
08/13 15:29, , 13F
08/13 15:29, 13F
推
08/13 15:33, , 14F
08/13 15:33, 14F
→
08/13 15:33, , 15F
08/13 15:33, 15F
→
08/13 15:34, , 16F
08/13 15:34, 16F
→
08/13 15:35, , 17F
08/13 15:35, 17F
→
08/13 15:36, , 18F
08/13 15:36, 18F
推
08/13 15:40, , 19F
08/13 15:40, 19F
→
08/13 15:41, , 20F
08/13 15:41, 20F
→
08/13 15:42, , 21F
08/13 15:42, 21F
→
08/13 15:44, , 22F
08/13 15:44, 22F
→
08/13 15:51, , 23F
08/13 15:51, 23F
→
08/13 15:52, , 24F
08/13 15:52, 24F
→
08/13 16:35, , 25F
08/13 16:35, 25F
→
08/13 16:35, , 26F
08/13 16:35, 26F
→
08/13 16:36, , 27F
08/13 16:36, 27F
→
08/13 16:37, , 28F
08/13 16:37, 28F
→
08/13 16:38, , 29F
08/13 16:38, 29F
噓
08/13 16:40, , 30F
08/13 16:40, 30F
→
08/13 16:40, , 31F
08/13 16:40, 31F
→
08/13 16:41, , 32F
08/13 16:41, 32F
→
08/13 16:41, , 33F
08/13 16:41, 33F
→
08/13 16:41, , 34F
08/13 16:41, 34F
→
08/13 16:41, , 35F
08/13 16:41, 35F
→
08/13 16:42, , 36F
08/13 16:42, 36F
→
08/13 16:42, , 37F
08/13 16:42, 37F
→
08/13 16:42, , 38F
08/13 16:42, 38F
→
08/13 16:42, , 39F
08/13 16:42, 39F
還有 36 則推文
→
08/14 15:26, , 76F
08/14 15:26, 76F
→
08/14 15:28, , 77F
08/14 15:28, 77F
→
08/14 15:30, , 78F
08/14 15:30, 78F
→
08/14 18:48, , 79F
08/14 18:48, 79F
→
08/14 18:49, , 80F
08/14 18:49, 80F
→
08/14 18:50, , 81F
08/14 18:50, 81F
→
08/14 18:54, , 82F
08/14 18:54, 82F
噓
08/14 21:37, , 83F
08/14 21:37, 83F
→
08/14 21:38, , 84F
08/14 21:38, 84F
噓
08/14 22:14, , 85F
08/14 22:14, 85F
推
08/14 22:22, , 86F
08/14 22:22, 86F
→
08/14 22:22, , 87F
08/14 22:22, 87F
→
08/14 22:24, , 88F
08/14 22:24, 88F
→
08/14 22:38, , 89F
08/14 22:38, 89F
→
08/15 00:53, , 90F
08/15 00:53, 90F
→
08/15 01:28, , 91F
08/15 01:28, 91F
噓
08/15 03:29, , 92F
08/15 03:29, 92F
推
08/15 17:31, , 93F
08/15 17:31, 93F
→
08/17 18:12, , 94F
08/17 18:12, 94F
→
08/17 18:18, , 95F
08/17 18:18, 95F
→
08/17 18:19, , 96F
08/17 18:19, 96F
推
08/19 00:29, , 97F
08/19 00:29, 97F
推
08/19 06:01, , 98F
08/19 06:01, 98F
→
08/19 06:02, , 99F
08/19 06:02, 99F
→
08/19 06:02, , 100F
08/19 06:02, 100F
噓
08/19 08:43, , 101F
08/19 08:43, 101F
→
08/19 08:45, , 102F
08/19 08:45, 102F
→
08/19 08:50, , 103F
08/19 08:50, 103F
→
08/19 08:52, , 104F
08/19 08:52, 104F
推
08/19 11:09, , 105F
08/19 11:09, 105F
噓
08/19 12:43, , 106F
08/19 12:43, 106F
→
08/19 12:51, , 107F
08/19 12:51, 107F
噓
08/19 14:01, , 108F
08/19 14:01, 108F
噓
08/19 16:20, , 109F
08/19 16:20, 109F
→
08/19 16:21, , 110F
08/19 16:21, 110F
→
08/19 16:22, , 111F
08/19 16:22, 111F
→
08/24 21:22, , 112F
08/24 21:22, 112F
推
08/25 10:52, , 113F
08/25 10:52, 113F
噓
08/25 20:27, , 114F
08/25 20:27, 114F
推
09/01 00:12, , 115F
09/01 00:12, 115F