Re: [討論] 誰讓陳金鋒引退變成了一場笑話已回收
說是笑話就太污辱陳金鋒三個字了,
但球團是不是真的有心在辦這個引退儀式我想大家都看在眼裡。
首先雕像的事也不用多說了,
比較好奇的是主辦單位事前都沒看過雕像實體?
大學生辦活動都知道要先行驗收了,
我是不相信一隻職業球隊會放心到不去檢驗贊助商的贊助啦。
如果事前已經知道雕像是這副模樣那還有種把它展示在球迷面前,
不是贊助費已入袋就是真的覺得這座雕像很傳神吧!
再者,
換局空檔的影片不就只是將按下播放鍵而已嗎?
球團好歹也可以再影片最後加上一段話什麼的都好吧XD
第三,請來一堆政商來致詞
當市長出來講話時要奪眶而出的眼淚一秒擒住,
很顯然胖周瑜跟中職還有鋒哥都不熟吧,
還可以說成鋒哥是第一個完成中職百轟的打者XD
會長根本也是來要其他球員打好國際賽為國爭光= =
至於其他贊助商就不多說了...
最後是背號引退儀式
看到升起的52號燈火時還以為是哪個系學會在辦活動,
就算因為是晚上要把球衣升起看不太清楚,
你也用個事後可以直接留在球場上的52標誌吧,
那個燈火實在是XD
我想很多人進場不是想看到活動辦得多厲害,
而是希望親眼見證鋒哥最後一次的揮棒還有在場上最後的身影。
不過活動過程中濃濃的商業氣息與官場文化,
是用心致敬還是用心消費我想就見仁見智了。
如果有人問我花250值不值得,
(會不會被戰才花250沒人權阿XD)
能見證陳金鋒球員生涯的最終章,還有什麼好不值的?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 123.193.225.215
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Baseball/M.1474298296.A.CB3.html
→
09/19 23:22, , 1F
09/19 23:22, 1F
推
09/19 23:23, , 2F
09/19 23:23, 2F
推
09/19 23:24, , 3F
09/19 23:24, 3F
推
09/19 23:24, , 4F
09/19 23:24, 4F
→
09/19 23:25, , 5F
09/19 23:25, 5F
是不認為作秀啦,但就是讓人感覺有點多餘
推
09/19 23:25, , 6F
09/19 23:25, 6F
→
09/19 23:25, , 7F
09/19 23:25, 7F
推
09/19 23:26, , 8F
09/19 23:26, 8F
鋒哥對6JT的感謝也只有籌備這場引退,
真的是看在劉董事長的面子留下來的。
推
09/19 23:26, , 9F
09/19 23:26, 9F
→
09/19 23:27, , 10F
09/19 23:27, 10F
→
09/19 23:27, , 11F
09/19 23:27, 11F
→
09/19 23:27, , 12F
09/19 23:27, 12F
推
09/19 23:28, , 13F
09/19 23:28, 13F
→
09/19 23:28, , 14F
09/19 23:28, 14F
推
09/19 23:28, , 15F
09/19 23:28, 15F
→
09/19 23:28, , 16F
09/19 23:28, 16F
→
09/19 23:28, , 17F
09/19 23:28, 17F
推
09/19 23:28, , 18F
09/19 23:28, 18F
推
09/19 23:31, , 19F
09/19 23:31, 19F
推
09/19 23:31, , 20F
09/19 23:31, 20F
→
09/19 23:31, , 21F
09/19 23:31, 21F
→
09/19 23:31, , 22F
09/19 23:31, 22F
→
09/19 23:34, , 23F
09/19 23:34, 23F
推
09/19 23:34, , 24F
09/19 23:34, 24F
推
09/19 23:34, , 25F
09/19 23:34, 25F
→
09/19 23:36, , 26F
09/19 23:36, 26F
影片請到這麼多大咖很不容易呀,
但就是太多細節可惜了也無法彌補了
→
09/19 23:37, , 27F
09/19 23:37, 27F
推
09/19 23:37, , 28F
09/19 23:37, 28F
推
09/19 23:38, , 29F
09/19 23:38, 29F
推
09/19 23:38, , 30F
09/19 23:38, 30F
→
09/19 23:38, , 31F
09/19 23:38, 31F
推
09/19 23:40, , 32F
09/19 23:40, 32F
推
09/19 23:41, , 33F
09/19 23:41, 33F
→
09/19 23:41, , 34F
09/19 23:41, 34F
→
09/19 23:42, , 35F
09/19 23:42, 35F
噓
09/19 23:42, , 36F
09/19 23:42, 36F
推
09/19 23:42, , 37F
09/19 23:42, 37F
推
09/19 23:43, , 38F
09/19 23:43, 38F
→
09/19 23:44, , 39F
09/19 23:44, 39F
→
09/19 23:44, , 40F
09/19 23:44, 40F
推
09/19 23:45, , 41F
09/19 23:45, 41F
推
09/19 23:47, , 42F
09/19 23:47, 42F
推
09/19 23:49, , 43F
09/19 23:49, 43F
→
09/20 00:04, , 44F
09/20 00:04, 44F
推
09/20 00:06, , 45F
09/20 00:06, 45F
→
09/20 00:07, , 46F
09/20 00:07, 46F
噓
09/20 00:10, , 47F
09/20 00:10, 47F
覺得很不錯很好呀^_^
※ 編輯: arkkgmcc567 (123.193.225.215), 09/20/2016 00:21:58
噓
09/20 00:18, , 48F
09/20 00:18, 48F
→
09/20 00:18, , 49F
09/20 00:18, 49F
→
09/20 00:19, , 50F
09/20 00:19, 50F
→
09/20 00:19, , 51F
09/20 00:19, 51F
好啦,可以麻煩說說為反而反的點在哪嗎www
推
09/20 00:21, , 52F
09/20 00:21, 52F
※ 編輯: arkkgmcc567 (123.193.225.215), 09/20/2016 00:23:25
→
09/20 00:35, , 53F
09/20 00:35, 53F
推
09/20 01:03, , 54F
09/20 01:03, 54F
推
09/20 01:19, , 55F
09/20 01:19, 55F
→
09/20 01:19, , 56F
09/20 01:19, 56F
→
09/20 01:20, , 57F
09/20 01:20, 57F
推
09/20 01:27, , 58F
09/20 01:27, 58F
噓
09/20 01:49, , 59F
09/20 01:49, 59F
→
09/20 02:24, , 60F
09/20 02:24, 60F
推
09/20 03:04, , 61F
09/20 03:04, 61F
推
09/20 07:38, , 62F
09/20 07:38, 62F
噓
09/20 08:20, , 63F
09/20 08:20, 63F
噓
09/20 09:45, , 64F
09/20 09:45, 64F
噓
09/20 11:11, , 65F
09/20 11:11, 65F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 6 之 7 篇):