[閒聊] 種鋼在鋼彈迷眼裡真的有那麼不堪嗎...已回收
其實是因為剛剛無意間翻到了這串大概半年前的系列文
"近十年來機器人動畫類必看前三名"
裡面只要有人提到了種鋼 之後就是一連串的吐槽或批判
要擋砲火也都是拿種命來擋 幾乎沒有對"種鋼本身"好評的聲音
看了真是讓人感嘆 畢竟好歹我自己是因為種鋼入坑的
雖然種系列的聲譽被續作種命拖累毀了一大半
一開始的劇情與初鋼相似或許也招致很多不滿
但難道在鋼彈迷眼中種鋼就真的這麼沒人愛 被批應該這樣嗎
身為它後輩的00 推文倒是不吝惜地給它讚譽 這難道就不是一種偏見嗎
雖然種鋼是我真正接觸的第一部鋼彈作品 但00我也很愛
在我眼中兩個都是很優秀的作品阿 為什麼在鋼彈迷眼中待遇卻差這麼多
至於平成系列 我沒經歷過那年代所以不太清楚他們當時的待遇怎樣
但我相信現在就算搬出平成系列出來被砲火打的一定還是種鋼
種鋼是招誰惹誰了阿!!(好啦好像真的招惹蠻多的)
以上是看完某串後個人的一點想法 我只能說 當種鋼迷真的是一件讓人很無奈的事情
有沒有鋼彈迷們要發表意見的 歡迎討論
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 113.77.130.107
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/C_Chat/M.1443672595.A.7E0.html
推
10/01 12:10, , 1F
10/01 12:10, 1F
推
10/01 12:11, , 2F
10/01 12:11, 2F
→
10/01 12:11, , 3F
10/01 12:11, 3F
→
10/01 12:11, , 4F
10/01 12:11, 4F
推
10/01 12:12, , 5F
10/01 12:12, 5F
→
10/01 12:12, , 6F
10/01 12:12, 6F
推
10/01 12:13, , 7F
10/01 12:13, 7F
推
10/01 12:13, , 8F
10/01 12:13, 8F
推
10/01 12:13, , 9F
10/01 12:13, 9F
→
10/01 12:13, , 10F
10/01 12:13, 10F
→
10/01 12:13, , 11F
10/01 12:13, 11F
→
10/01 12:13, , 12F
10/01 12:13, 12F
→
10/01 12:14, , 13F
10/01 12:14, 13F
→
10/01 12:14, , 14F
10/01 12:14, 14F
推
10/01 12:14, , 15F
10/01 12:14, 15F
→
10/01 12:14, , 16F
10/01 12:14, 16F
→
10/01 12:14, , 17F
10/01 12:14, 17F
→
10/01 12:14, , 18F
10/01 12:14, 18F
推
10/01 12:15, , 19F
10/01 12:15, 19F
推
10/01 12:15, , 20F
10/01 12:15, 20F
推
10/01 12:15, , 21F
10/01 12:15, 21F
→
10/01 12:15, , 22F
10/01 12:15, 22F
推
10/01 12:16, , 23F
10/01 12:16, 23F
→
10/01 12:16, , 24F
10/01 12:16, 24F
→
10/01 12:16, , 25F
10/01 12:16, 25F
→
10/01 12:16, , 26F
10/01 12:16, 26F
推
10/01 12:16, , 27F
10/01 12:16, 27F
推
10/01 12:16, , 28F
10/01 12:16, 28F
→
10/01 12:16, , 29F
10/01 12:16, 29F
→
10/01 12:16, , 30F
10/01 12:16, 30F
推
10/01 12:17, , 31F
10/01 12:17, 31F
推
10/01 12:17, , 32F
10/01 12:17, 32F
→
10/01 12:17, , 33F
10/01 12:17, 33F
→
10/01 12:17, , 34F
10/01 12:17, 34F
→
10/01 12:18, , 35F
10/01 12:18, 35F
推
10/01 12:18, , 36F
10/01 12:18, 36F
推
10/01 12:18, , 37F
10/01 12:18, 37F
→
10/01 12:18, , 38F
10/01 12:18, 38F
→
10/01 12:18, , 39F
10/01 12:18, 39F
還有 303 則推文
→
10/01 21:08, , 343F
10/01 21:08, 343F
推
10/01 21:08, , 344F
10/01 21:08, 344F
推
10/01 21:55, , 345F
10/01 21:55, 345F
→
10/01 21:56, , 346F
10/01 21:56, 346F
→
10/01 21:57, , 347F
10/01 21:57, 347F
→
10/01 21:57, , 348F
10/01 21:57, 348F
→
10/01 22:23, , 349F
10/01 22:23, 349F
→
10/01 22:23, , 350F
10/01 22:23, 350F
→
10/01 22:24, , 351F
10/01 22:24, 351F
推
10/01 23:09, , 352F
10/01 23:09, 352F
→
10/01 23:10, , 353F
10/01 23:10, 353F
→
10/01 23:12, , 354F
10/01 23:12, 354F
推
10/01 23:25, , 355F
10/01 23:25, 355F
→
10/01 23:26, , 356F
10/01 23:26, 356F
→
10/01 23:29, , 357F
10/01 23:29, 357F
→
10/01 23:31, , 358F
10/01 23:31, 358F
→
10/01 23:32, , 359F
10/01 23:32, 359F
→
10/01 23:34, , 360F
10/01 23:34, 360F
推
10/01 23:37, , 361F
10/01 23:37, 361F
推
10/01 23:41, , 362F
10/01 23:41, 362F
→
10/01 23:44, , 363F
10/01 23:44, 363F
→
10/01 23:46, , 364F
10/01 23:46, 364F
推
10/01 23:50, , 365F
10/01 23:50, 365F
推
10/02 02:41, , 366F
10/02 02:41, 366F
推
10/02 06:51, , 367F
10/02 06:51, 367F
→
10/02 06:51, , 368F
10/02 06:51, 368F
→
10/02 06:52, , 369F
10/02 06:52, 369F
→
10/02 06:53, , 370F
10/02 06:53, 370F
→
10/02 06:53, , 371F
10/02 06:53, 371F
→
10/02 06:54, , 372F
10/02 06:54, 372F
推
10/02 09:07, , 373F
10/02 09:07, 373F
→
10/02 10:20, , 374F
10/02 10:20, 374F
→
10/02 10:20, , 375F
10/02 10:20, 375F
→
10/02 10:21, , 376F
10/02 10:21, 376F
→
10/02 10:22, , 377F
10/02 10:22, 377F
推
10/02 10:52, , 378F
10/02 10:52, 378F
→
10/02 10:53, , 379F
10/02 10:53, 379F
推
10/02 12:54, , 380F
10/02 12:54, 380F
推
10/02 14:57, , 381F
10/02 14:57, 381F
→
10/02 14:58, , 382F
10/02 14:58, 382F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 4 篇):