[討論] 實力教室小說真的有很差嗎已回收
乘著系列文的風潮
我來問個我想了一陣子的問題
先說我是小說黨的
必須說 剛看第一本時
我以為是一部主角裝B完開掛開後宮的作品
結果看完6本了
跟我以為的完全不一樣
妹子越來越多
但至少沒有都像上輩子沒見過男人一樣看到男主就莫名貼上去
喜歡男主的也有合理原因
男角也有重要戲份擔當
而不是只有單純拿來襯托男主
男主雖然裝B 但至少作者不是因為覺得這樣很cool才讓男主裝B
角色刻畫也不算差
雖然不敢說很好很完美
但 真的有這麼差嗎
喊糞作的人可以告訴我原因嗎QQ
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 219.69.109.160
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/C_Chat/M.1505311335.A.BCF.html
→
09/13 22:03, , 1F
09/13 22:03, 1F
→
09/13 22:03, , 2F
09/13 22:03, 2F
推
09/13 22:03, , 3F
09/13 22:03, 3F
噓
09/13 22:03, , 4F
09/13 22:03, 4F
路哥是因為想要自由生活啊
又不是"答應師傅不打架"那種莫名其妙的藏招
他的心態是不想惹這麼多麻煩
→
09/13 22:03, , 5F
09/13 22:03, 5F
推
09/13 22:04, , 6F
09/13 22:04, 6F
→
09/13 22:05, , 7F
09/13 22:05, 7F
沒有"說"過 但是至少路哥有他的理由
※ 編輯: reachhard (219.69.109.160), 09/13/2017 22:05:23
推
09/13 22:05, , 8F
09/13 22:05, 8F
推
09/13 22:05, , 9F
09/13 22:05, 9F
→
09/13 22:05, , 10F
09/13 22:05, 10F
其實我到現在還是不懂yy是什麼意思...
推
09/13 22:06, , 11F
09/13 22:06, 11F
※ 編輯: reachhard (219.69.109.160), 09/13/2017 22:08:03
推
09/13 22:09, , 12F
09/13 22:09, 12F
→
09/13 22:09, , 13F
09/13 22:09, 13F
的確有人認為小說不好 雖然不多
推
09/13 22:09, , 14F
09/13 22:09, 14F
→
09/13 22:10, , 15F
09/13 22:10, 15F
→
09/13 22:10, , 16F
09/13 22:10, 16F
說真的 一開始我沒抱任何期待
推
09/13 22:13, , 17F
09/13 22:13, 17F
※ 編輯: reachhard (219.69.109.160), 09/13/2017 22:16:08
→
09/13 22:16, , 18F
09/13 22:16, 18F
→
09/13 22:16, , 19F
09/13 22:16, 19F
推
09/13 22:17, , 20F
09/13 22:17, 20F
推
09/13 22:22, , 21F
09/13 22:22, 21F
→
09/13 22:23, , 22F
09/13 22:23, 22F
什麼前科XD 我對這個作者不是很了解
→
09/13 22:23, , 23F
09/13 22:23, 23F
※ 編輯: reachhard (219.69.109.160), 09/13/2017 22:25:07
推
09/13 22:25, , 24F
09/13 22:25, 24F
→
09/13 22:25, , 25F
09/13 22:25, 25F
推
09/13 22:25, , 26F
09/13 22:25, 26F
galgame不在我的守備範圍啦
→
09/13 22:26, , 27F
09/13 22:26, 27F
推
09/13 22:28, , 28F
09/13 22:28, 28F
推
09/13 22:30, , 29F
09/13 22:30, 29F
※ 編輯: reachhard (219.69.109.160), 09/13/2017 22:30:09
→
09/13 22:30, , 30F
09/13 22:30, 30F
→
09/13 22:30, , 31F
09/13 22:30, 31F
推
09/13 22:31, , 32F
09/13 22:31, 32F
→
09/13 22:31, , 33F
09/13 22:31, 33F
推
09/13 22:35, , 34F
09/13 22:35, 34F
→
09/13 22:35, , 35F
09/13 22:35, 35F
→
09/13 22:35, , 36F
09/13 22:35, 36F
還好啦 卡多都看了(遠目
推
09/13 22:36, , 37F
09/13 22:36, 37F
※ 編輯: reachhard (219.69.109.160), 09/13/2017 22:37:12
推
09/13 22:40, , 38F
09/13 22:40, 38F
→
09/13 22:40, , 39F
09/13 22:40, 39F
→
09/13 22:41, , 40F
09/13 22:41, 40F
→
09/13 22:41, , 41F
09/13 22:41, 41F
推
09/13 22:45, , 42F
09/13 22:45, 42F
推
09/13 23:09, , 43F
09/13 23:09, 43F
推
09/13 23:11, , 44F
09/13 23:11, 44F
推
09/13 23:12, , 45F
09/13 23:12, 45F
→
09/13 23:12, , 46F
09/13 23:12, 46F
→
09/13 23:14, , 47F
09/13 23:14, 47F
→
09/13 23:14, , 48F
09/13 23:14, 48F
推
09/13 23:16, , 49F
09/13 23:16, 49F
會嗎 不想惹麻煩 想平平穩穩安全下庄這理由很正常吧
推
09/13 23:17, , 50F
09/13 23:17, 50F
推
09/13 23:28, , 51F
09/13 23:28, 51F
→
09/13 23:28, , 52F
09/13 23:28, 52F
→
09/13 23:29, , 53F
09/13 23:29, 53F
→
09/13 23:45, , 54F
09/13 23:45, 54F
已經很不像了其實
→
09/13 23:47, , 55F
09/13 23:47, 55F
※ 編輯: reachhard (219.69.109.160), 09/13/2017 23:51:17
推
09/13 23:55, , 56F
09/13 23:55, 56F
→
09/13 23:55, , 57F
09/13 23:55, 57F
推
09/13 23:57, , 58F
09/13 23:57, 58F
推
09/14 00:00, , 59F
09/14 00:00, 59F
推
09/14 00:20, , 60F
09/14 00:20, 60F
推
09/14 01:00, , 61F
09/14 01:00, 61F
→
09/14 01:01, , 62F
09/14 01:01, 62F
→
09/14 01:01, , 63F
09/14 01:01, 63F
噓
09/14 01:14, , 64F
09/14 01:14, 64F
推
09/14 03:01, , 65F
09/14 03:01, 65F
→
09/14 03:02, , 66F
09/14 03:02, 66F
這真的是敗筆 很大的瑕疵
推
09/14 03:26, , 67F
09/14 03:26, 67F
→
09/14 03:26, , 68F
09/14 03:26, 68F
推
09/14 03:41, , 69F
09/14 03:41, 69F
上面不就一個噓了(笑
※ 編輯: reachhard (27.52.198.210), 09/14/2017 07:23:47
推
09/14 13:06, , 70F
09/14 13:06, 70F
→
09/14 13:07, , 71F
09/14 13:07, 71F
→
09/14 13:08, , 72F
09/14 13:08, 72F
→
09/14 13:08, , 73F
09/14 13:08, 73F
→
09/14 13:09, , 74F
09/14 13:09, 74F
推
09/14 15:40, , 75F
09/14 15:40, 75F
推
09/14 18:22, , 76F
09/14 18:22, 76F
討論串 (同標題文章)