Re: [轉錄][新聞] 鷹王比龍王更適合公牛 聯手皇帝눠…
簡單列出公牛和老鷹10/11後的薪資陣容
芝加哥公牛
Player 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14
Luol Deng $11,355,850 $12,341,275 $13,326,700 $14,312,125
Kirk Hinrich $9,000,000 $8,000,000
Derrick Rose $5,546,160 $6,993,707 $9,091,819
Joakim Noah $3,128,536 $4,239,166
James Johnson $1,713,600 $1,833,120 $2,812,006 $3,950,868
Taj Gibson $1,117,680 $1,195,680 $2,155,811 $3,181,977
$31,861,826 $20,341,275 $13,326,700 $14,312,125
Player Option / Team Option / Qualifying Offer / 80% Scale Offer
亞特蘭大老鷹
Player 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14
Josh Smith $11,600,000 $12,400,000 $13,200,000
Jamal Crawford $10,080,000
Marvin Williams $6,712,500 $7,500,000 $8,287,500 $7,500,000
Mike Bibby $5,564,767 $6,217,617
Zaza Pachulia $4,251,250 $4,750,000 $5,248,750
Al Horford $5,444,857 $7,143,652
Maurice Evans $2,500,000
Jeff Teague $1,476,840 $1,579,920 $2,433,076 $3,469,566
TOTALS: $47,630,214 $30,867,617 $26,736,250
老鷹經過今年季後賽
應該會看清JJ 不是他們想要的答案
JJ也看得出不想留在亞特蘭大
老鷹拿JJ來換 Hinrich + Deng +選秀權
Bibby看起來不能頂先發了 老鷹會想補強PG
M.Williams也打不出先發水準 補上滷蛋 他們咬一咬牙應該會吞下去
如果JJ不拿高薪 甘願做小的 假設簽個1500萬
那麼公牛總薪資只剩 2500萬
(純粹假設 或許老鷹想把Bibby送來 送來也不錯啦 多個有經驗的好替補)
目前看來LBJ對公牛興趣最高
交易到JJ後又有薪資空間 他和Bosh加入可能性更大
公牛夢幻理想陣容
先發 C:Noah PF:Bosh SF:LBJ SG:JJ PG:Rose
替補 C:老米 PF:Gibson SF:James Johnson SG:?? PG:Bibby
能有Bibby和Brad當替補是最好囉
這先發跟替補 無論是誰都會看到流口水
加上打造出超賽銅牆鐵壁防守 的總教練
肯定是奪冠大熱門!!
當然老鷹也不會虧到
PG:Hinrich SG:Crawford SF:滷蛋 PF:賈詡 C:Al
也不錯啦
--
我是路過的太陽迷
發表一下小小幻想文 假若不符合板規
請版大通知我我自己會自d 感恩
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 111.249.147.175
推
06/12 00:58, , 1F
06/12 00:58, 1F
推
06/12 01:00, , 2F
06/12 01:00, 2F
→
06/12 01:04, , 3F
06/12 01:04, 3F
→
06/12 01:05, , 4F
06/12 01:05, 4F
→
06/12 01:06, , 5F
06/12 01:06, 5F
推
06/12 01:11, , 6F
06/12 01:11, 6F
→
06/12 01:11, , 7F
06/12 01:11, 7F
→
06/12 01:13, , 8F
06/12 01:13, 8F
→
06/12 01:14, , 9F
06/12 01:14, 9F
→
06/12 01:15, , 10F
06/12 01:15, 10F
→
06/12 01:15, , 11F
06/12 01:15, 11F
推
06/12 01:23, , 12F
06/12 01:23, 12F
→
06/12 01:23, , 13F
06/12 01:23, 13F
推
06/12 01:25, , 14F
06/12 01:25, 14F
→
06/12 01:26, , 15F
06/12 01:26, 15F
→
06/12 01:27, , 16F
06/12 01:27, 16F
→
06/12 01:28, , 17F
06/12 01:28, 17F
推
06/12 01:29, , 18F
06/12 01:29, 18F
→
06/12 01:30, , 19F
06/12 01:30, 19F
推
06/12 01:34, , 20F
06/12 01:34, 20F
→
06/12 01:35, , 21F
06/12 01:35, 21F
→
06/12 01:38, , 22F
06/12 01:38, 22F
→
06/12 01:39, , 23F
06/12 01:39, 23F
→
06/12 01:40, , 24F
06/12 01:40, 24F
→
06/12 01:41, , 25F
06/12 01:41, 25F
推
06/12 01:51, , 26F
06/12 01:51, 26F
推
06/12 01:51, , 27F
06/12 01:51, 27F
→
06/12 01:52, , 28F
06/12 01:52, 28F
→
06/12 01:52, , 29F
06/12 01:52, 29F
→
06/12 01:54, , 30F
06/12 01:54, 30F
→
06/12 01:54, , 31F
06/12 01:54, 31F
推
06/12 01:54, , 32F
06/12 01:54, 32F
→
06/12 01:56, , 33F
06/12 01:56, 33F
推
06/12 02:02, , 34F
06/12 02:02, 34F
→
06/12 02:03, , 35F
06/12 02:03, 35F
推
06/12 07:36, , 36F
06/12 07:36, 36F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 3 篇):