Re: [新聞] 藏方希望中國很快地能夠認識到《中間道路》是解決西藏問題的雙贏方案
: 推 lkcs:“網絡文章這種都是第二首資料”這話誰說的? 119.130.99.89 07/23 06:14
: → lkcs:結果這個人只能繼續拿網絡文章做資料 119.130.99.89 07/23 06:14
: → lkcs:我引述的是老和尚的原話,反而成第三手真搞笑 119.130.99.89 07/23 06:14
網路文章的資料為什麼是二手呢?,因為會參雜作者自己個人的想法,可能引用一段話
或者文章的一小段,來支持自己的論點
你的資料最大的問題,是幾句話並不是出現在同一個說話的場合或同一文章
既然不是同一來源,你怎麼確定是在說同一件事,或是它的順序是如此排列的?
所以這充其量是你個人的觀點,講好聽是造假,難聽一點就是抹黑
況且你只有擷取一段話,就好比說了主題但沒有支撐的論述,這怎麼會有說服力
這個就是斷章取義,要引用別人的話,麻煩前後文都一起引用,這是才是客觀
: 推 lkcs:我并沒有更改老和尚任何一個字,或者論點。 119.130.99.89 07/23 06:22
: → lkcs:你所說的那一句,我完整引用到了句號。china. 119.130.99.89 07/23 06:22
: → lkcs:你補充的是論據,你可以再補充一千條 119.130.99.89 07/23 06:23
: → lkcs:正如納粹也有他們很好的論據來證明自己的論點 119.130.99.89 07/23 06:24
: → lkcs:但那個論點,是不會變的 119.130.99.89 07/23 06:24
既然有人想被打臉,那我就直接打下去,以下是引用的內容
Abandonment of China's population transfer policy,which threatened
the very existence of the Tibetans as a people.
it is imperative that the population transfer is stopped and Chinese
settlers return to China.
I also called for a halt to the Chinese population transfer into Tibet.
the Chinese Government should abandon its policy of transferring Chinese
to Tibet.
Our concern is the induced massive movement of primarily Han but also
some other nationalities into many areas of Tibet.
1.Abandonment of China's population transfer policy,which threatened
the very existence of the Tibetans as a people.
這一句是出次達賴五項和平計畫,所以可以單獨來看
從內容來說很合理,威脅到西藏人生存的中國人遷移本來就該禁止
因為影響到當地人的生存,還是你認為西藏人滅絕無所謂?
換個角度來想,沒威脅到西藏人生存的移民,應該是可以許可的
2. it is imperative that the population transfer is stopped and Chinese
settlers return to China.
完整文章內容:
http://www.dalailama.com/messages/tibet/five-point-peace-plan
另外,這個是1987年的資料,20多年前的會不會太舊了
前後文是這樣:”For the Tibetans to survive as a people, it is imperative
that the population transfer is stopped and Chinese settlers return to
China. Otherwise, Tibetans will soon be no more than a tourist attraction
and relic of a noble past.”
你漏掉” For the Tibetans to survive as a people,”
這個叫做一字沒改,別笑死人,然後這一段是結論
上一段有達賴的解釋說明:
Today, in the whole of Tibet 7.5 million Chinese settlers have already been
sent, outnumbering the Tibetan population of 6 million. In central and
western Tibet, now referred to by the Chinese as the "Tibet Autonomous
Region", Chinese sources admit the 1.9 million Tibetans already constitute
a minority of the region's population. These numbers do not take the
estimated 300,000-500,000 troops in Tibet into account - 250,000 of
them in so-called Tibet Autonomous Region.
加上這個說明就很清楚,因為在西藏內,中國移民已經超過
藏人的數量,這已經壓迫到藏人的生存空間的
3. I also called for a halt to the Chinese population transfer into Tibet.
完整文章:
http://www.dalailama.com/messages/tibet/strasbourg-proposal-1988
這個好像是1988年的演講
完整的句子是這樣:
I also called for respect of human rights, democratic ideals, environmental
protection, and a halt to the Chinese population transfer into Tibet.
中間刪掉”respect of human rights, democratic ideals, environmental
protection” 這個叫一字不改,真是臉皮夠厚
前後文內容:
I announced a Five Point Peace Plan for Tibet. In it I called for a
conversion of Tibet into a zone of peace, a sanctuary in which
humanity and nature can live together in harmony. I also called
for respect of human rights, democratic ideals, environmental
protection, and a halt to the Chinese population transfer into Tibet.
4. the Chinese Government should abandon its policy of transferring
Chinese to Tibet.
這一句跟第三句是出自同一邊文章,原句如下:
In order to create an atmosphere of trust conductive to fruitful
negotiations,the Chinese Government should cease its human
rights violations in Tibet and abandon its policy of transferring
Chinese to Tibet.
中間的cease its human rights violations in Tibet 也不見了
真奇怪,人權這的單字好像特別容易消失
因為這段只有一句,所以就沒前後文的問題
5. Our concern is the induced massive movement of primarily Han
but also some other nationalities into many areas of Tibet.
這次總算比較新,2008年達賴到歐州議會演說
完整文章:http://ppt.cc/g~hP
完整句子:
Our concern is the induced massive movement of primarily Han,
but also some other nationalities, into many Tibetan areas, which in
turn marginalizes the native Tibetan population and threatens Tibet's
fragile natural environment.
後面又少一段,你臉還不夠腫嗎
前後文如下:
We have made it clear in our memorandum that our intention is not to
expel non-Tibetans. Our concern is the induced massive movement of
primarily Han, but also some other nationalities, into many Tibetan areas,
which in turn marginalizes the native Tibetan population and threatens
Tibet's fragile natural environment. Major demographic changes that result
from massive migration will lead to the assimilation rather than integration
of the Tibetan nationality into the PRC and gradually lead to the extinction
of the distinct culture and identity of the Tibetan people.
第一句以經說明了,不是要把中國人驅除掉,
最後一句怕被同化掉,然後導致西藏文化被滅絕
從整篇看下,達賴的擔憂很清楚,不希望藏人的生存和文化受到威脅,
大規模移民可能就會造成這種問題,以一個藏人的領導者這
些談話相當合理,為什麼你會認為達賴是種族清洗主義者?
不讓中國人移民就叫種族清洗,那加拿大禁止中國人投資移民
是不是也是種族清洗?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 35.32.206.7
※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/CrossStrait/M.1406077308.A.524.html
推
07/23 09:06, , 1F
07/23 09:06, 1F
你漏了一段,在威脅到西藏人的生存和文化的情況下,麻煩重點看清楚
還是你的論點是,西藏的東西是屬於中國人的,西藏人就是該死
如果是這樣,那你比較支持種族清理政策的人
※ 編輯: godwind7 (35.32.206.7), 07/23/2014 09:29:49
推
07/23 09:35, , 2F
07/23 09:35, 2F
西藏現在是要求自治,也不要獨立,不曉得老共在怕什麼
※ 編輯: godwind7 (35.32.206.7), 07/23/2014 09:37:45
→
07/23 09:41, , 3F
07/23 09:41, 3F
推
07/23 09:41, , 4F
07/23 09:41, 4F
→
07/23 09:42, , 5F
07/23 09:42, 5F
→
07/23 09:42, , 6F
07/23 09:42, 6F
→
07/23 09:42, , 7F
07/23 09:42, 7F
這是事實,我第一次跟藏人吃飯提到西藏獨立的話題,他們直接笑著說:
「早就不爭取獨立了,只是希望能夠自治。」
西藏流亡政府的網站還有Memorandum on Geniune Autonomy
※ 編輯: godwind7 (35.32.206.7), 07/23/2014 09:50:05
推
07/23 09:46, , 8F
07/23 09:46, 8F
→
07/23 09:47, , 9F
07/23 09:47, 9F
中共手段真的還蠻狠的,斬草徹底除跟XD
推
07/23 09:48, , 10F
07/23 09:48, 10F
矛盾就在這裡,中共要西藏這塊地方,但是住在這塊土地上的人呢
→
07/23 09:48, , 11F
07/23 09:48, 11F
那不然你說中國人威脅到西藏人的生存要怎麼處理
※ 編輯: godwind7 (35.32.206.7), 07/23/2014 09:53:34
推
07/23 09:51, , 12F
07/23 09:51, 12F
推
07/23 09:52, , 13F
07/23 09:52, 13F
→
07/23 09:52, , 14F
07/23 09:52, 14F
→
07/23 09:52, , 15F
07/23 09:52, 15F
→
07/23 09:53, , 16F
07/23 09:53, 16F
達賴畢竟是宗教家,凡事只要能夠和平解決就是最好的
他要的就是西藏的和平、人權和文化的延續,就這麼簡單
※ 編輯: godwind7 (35.32.206.7), 07/23/2014 09:55:44
推
07/23 09:57, , 17F
07/23 09:57, 17F
→
07/23 09:57, , 18F
07/23 09:57, 18F
藏人自己也認為難度太高了,況且印度政府也有暗中打壓西藏人的勢力
不過等老共垮台說不定有可能XD
※ 編輯: godwind7 (35.32.206.7), 07/23/2014 10:01:38
推
07/23 10:02, , 19F
07/23 10:02, 19F
→
07/23 10:02, , 20F
07/23 10:02, 20F
KMT:獨立的話,老共會打過來XD
※ 編輯: godwind7 (35.32.206.7), 07/23/2014 10:05:13
推
07/23 10:07, , 21F
07/23 10:07, 21F
→
07/23 10:08, , 22F
07/23 10:08, 22F
→
07/23 10:09, , 23F
07/23 10:09, 23F
→
07/23 10:09, , 24F
07/23 10:09, 24F
現代化這個是難免的,不過把藏人的宗教信仰剝奪,這個就是中共的錯誤
更何況還有一堆迫害人權的事實
推
07/23 10:10, , 25F
07/23 10:10, 25F
※ 編輯: godwind7 (35.32.206.7), 07/23/2014 10:13:07
→
07/23 10:12, , 26F
07/23 10:12, 26F
我現在就在美國念書,美國人也在反省這些事情,也做了一些措施來彌補
那請問一下中共有在反省嗎
※ 編輯: godwind7 (35.32.206.7), 07/23/2014 10:15:12
推
07/23 10:14, , 27F
07/23 10:14, 27F
還有 241 則推文
還有 43 段內文
→
07/23 23:47, , 269F
07/23 23:47, 269F
→
07/23 23:47, , 270F
07/23 23:47, 270F
→
07/23 23:48, , 271F
07/23 23:48, 271F
→
07/23 23:48, , 272F
07/23 23:48, 272F
→
07/23 23:49, , 273F
07/23 23:49, 273F
→
07/23 23:49, , 274F
07/23 23:49, 274F
→
07/23 23:50, , 275F
07/23 23:50, 275F
→
07/23 23:50, , 276F
07/23 23:50, 276F
→
07/23 23:51, , 277F
07/23 23:51, 277F
→
07/23 23:52, , 278F
07/23 23:52, 278F
我們分歧點就在這裡,我覺得人權是高於國家之上,所以中共跟美國的人權情形
不應該綁在一起,而且就現實面而言,憑什麼美國人權做好中共就會跟進
※ 編輯: godwind7 (35.32.206.7), 07/24/2014 00:04:32
→
07/24 00:06, , 279F
07/24 00:06, 279F
→
07/24 00:07, , 280F
07/24 00:07, 280F
→
07/24 00:07, , 281F
07/24 00:07, 281F
→
07/24 00:08, , 282F
07/24 00:08, 282F
→
07/24 00:08, , 283F
07/24 00:08, 283F
→
07/24 00:09, , 284F
07/24 00:09, 284F
→
07/24 00:09, , 285F
07/24 00:09, 285F
→
07/24 00:09, , 286F
07/24 00:09, 286F
美國是現代化國家楷模? 那是你的觀點,別把把老共的人權問題跟美國綁在一起
要實踐也不是只有美國人才能做,中國自己內部也可以自己檢討
※ 編輯: godwind7 (35.32.206.7), 07/24/2014 00:41:12
推
07/24 07:46, , 287F
07/24 07:46, 287F
→
07/24 07:48, , 288F
07/24 07:48, 288F
→
07/24 07:49, , 289F
07/24 07:49, 289F
推
07/24 15:30, , 290F
07/24 15:30, 290F
→
07/24 15:30, , 291F
07/24 15:30, 291F
→
07/24 15:31, , 292F
07/24 15:31, 292F
→
07/24 15:31, , 293F
07/24 15:31, 293F
→
07/24 15:32, , 294F
07/24 15:32, 294F
→
07/24 15:33, , 295F
07/24 15:33, 295F
→
07/24 15:33, , 296F
07/24 15:33, 296F
→
07/24 15:34, , 297F
07/24 15:34, 297F
→
07/24 15:35, , 298F
07/24 15:35, 298F
推
07/24 15:39, , 299F
07/24 15:39, 299F
→
07/24 15:39, , 300F
07/24 15:39, 300F
→
07/24 15:40, , 301F
07/24 15:40, 301F
→
07/24 15:40, , 302F
07/24 15:40, 302F
→
07/24 15:40, , 303F
07/24 15:40, 303F
推
07/24 16:56, , 304F
07/24 16:56, 304F
推
07/28 15:03, , 305F
07/28 15:03, 305F
→
01/01 23:59,
5年前
, 306F
01/01 23:59, 306F
討論串 (同標題文章)