Re: [請益] GOT 席恩和囧恩在史塔克家誰的地位高?
看板EAseries作者azazaz66 (Darker Than Black)時間8年前 (2016/06/29 01:33)推噓18(18推 0噓 51→)留言69則, 21人參與討論串3/5 (看更多)
推文討論到
Ned編囧恩是自己的私生子不夠聰明
連老婆都不相信害凱特琳受到傷害
但是這謊言搞不好是狼爸這輩子最聰明的決定
試想如果狼爸告訴凱特囧恩是自己親妹妹的孩子
狼媽怎麼可能會多年來一看到囧恩就賭爛
搞不好會當自己的親兒子來對待咧
狼媽又不是演技派
如果外人看到一個正室對私生子疼愛有加
囧恩的身世肯定是會招到懷疑
被家裡下人看到 一傳十十傳百 最後就是紙包不住火等GG
所以我說這謊言最該被騙的就是凱特琳
讓整個謊言看起來更加逼真
推文還說Ned太直太蠢不會說話
其實我看Ned的智慧財是讓人想不到吧
一個小設定就能看出作者的功力
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 38.99.114.122
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/EAseries/M.1467135186.A.800.html
推
06/29 01:36, , 1F
06/29 01:36, 1F
推
06/29 01:38, , 2F
06/29 01:38, 2F
→
06/29 01:39, , 3F
06/29 01:39, 3F
→
06/29 01:39, , 4F
06/29 01:39, 4F
奈德的智慧或許不是在政治或人際關係上
你看第一季奈德到了君臨調查將艾琳的死因
還能循線發現瑟希三個兒子都不是和勞勃生的八卦
狼家的人缺點就是做人太直人際關係處理不好
你看Robb也是各種神奇作戰打爆蘭妮絲特
可惜就是政治0分
→
06/29 01:39, , 5F
06/29 01:39, 5F
※ 編輯: azazaz66 (38.99.114.122), 06/29/2016 01:45:03
→
06/29 01:40, , 6F
06/29 01:40, 6F
→
06/29 01:41, , 7F
06/29 01:41, 7F
→
06/29 01:43, , 8F
06/29 01:43, 8F
→
06/29 01:43, , 9F
06/29 01:43, 9F
→
06/29 01:45, , 10F
06/29 01:45, 10F
推
06/29 01:45, , 11F
06/29 01:45, 11F
→
06/29 01:47, , 12F
06/29 01:47, 12F
→
06/29 01:48, , 13F
06/29 01:48, 13F
→
06/29 01:48, , 14F
06/29 01:48, 14F
→
06/29 01:49, , 15F
06/29 01:49, 15F
→
06/29 01:49, , 16F
06/29 01:49, 16F
→
06/29 01:49, , 17F
06/29 01:49, 17F
→
06/29 01:49, , 18F
06/29 01:49, 18F
→
06/29 01:50, , 19F
06/29 01:50, 19F
→
06/29 01:51, , 20F
06/29 01:51, 20F
推
06/29 01:52, , 21F
06/29 01:52, 21F
→
06/29 01:52, , 22F
06/29 01:52, 22F
→
06/29 01:53, , 23F
06/29 01:53, 23F
→
06/29 01:53, , 24F
06/29 01:53, 24F
推
06/29 01:56, , 25F
06/29 01:56, 25F
→
06/29 01:57, , 26F
06/29 01:57, 26F
推
06/29 01:58, , 27F
06/29 01:58, 27F
→
06/29 01:59, , 28F
06/29 01:59, 28F
→
06/29 01:59, , 29F
06/29 01:59, 29F
→
06/29 02:01, , 30F
06/29 02:01, 30F
→
06/29 02:02, , 31F
06/29 02:02, 31F
→
06/29 02:03, , 32F
06/29 02:03, 32F
→
06/29 02:05, , 33F
06/29 02:05, 33F
→
06/29 02:06, , 34F
06/29 02:06, 34F
推
06/29 03:46, , 35F
06/29 03:46, 35F
推
06/29 05:12, , 36F
06/29 05:12, 36F
→
06/29 05:13, , 37F
06/29 05:13, 37F
→
06/29 05:14, , 38F
06/29 05:14, 38F
→
06/29 05:16, , 39F
06/29 05:16, 39F
→
06/29 05:17, , 40F
06/29 05:17, 40F
→
06/29 05:18, , 41F
06/29 05:18, 41F
→
06/29 05:21, , 42F
06/29 05:21, 42F
→
06/29 05:25, , 43F
06/29 05:25, 43F
→
06/29 05:26, , 44F
06/29 05:26, 44F
→
06/29 05:29, , 45F
06/29 05:29, 45F
推
06/29 08:13, , 46F
06/29 08:13, 46F
推
06/29 08:42, , 47F
06/29 08:42, 47F
→
06/29 09:02, , 48F
06/29 09:02, 48F
→
06/29 09:02, , 49F
06/29 09:02, 49F
推
06/29 09:10, , 50F
06/29 09:10, 50F
推
06/29 09:32, , 51F
06/29 09:32, 51F
→
06/29 09:32, , 52F
06/29 09:32, 52F
推
06/29 10:29, , 53F
06/29 10:29, 53F
→
06/29 10:40, , 54F
06/29 10:40, 54F
→
06/29 10:41, , 55F
06/29 10:41, 55F
→
06/29 10:41, , 56F
06/29 10:41, 56F
→
06/29 10:42, , 57F
06/29 10:42, 57F
推
06/29 11:18, , 58F
06/29 11:18, 58F
推
06/29 12:50, , 59F
06/29 12:50, 59F
推
06/29 17:02, , 60F
06/29 17:02, 60F
推
06/30 14:11, , 61F
06/30 14:11, 61F
→
06/30 14:11, , 62F
06/30 14:11, 62F
→
06/30 14:12, , 63F
06/30 14:12, 63F
→
06/30 14:12, , 64F
06/30 14:12, 64F
→
06/30 14:13, , 65F
06/30 14:13, 65F
→
06/30 14:13, , 66F
06/30 14:13, 66F
推
07/03 17:22, , 67F
07/03 17:22, 67F
→
07/03 17:22, , 68F
07/03 17:22, 68F
→
07/03 17:23, , 69F
07/03 17:23, 69F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 3 之 5 篇):