[文法] 彭蒙惠出現的一段句子

看板Eng-Class作者 (cronaldo)時間13年前 (2011/04/14 17:26), 編輯推噓2(2推 0噓 15→)
留言17則, 5人參與, 最新討論串1/4 (看更多)
A person dressed in a costume near a busy street, waving to drivers and usuaully holding a sign with a deal to a pizza place, hair salon or even a tax service. 這邊看起來並沒有動詞 還原 A person (who was) dressed in a coustume....street, waves ..and holds似乎比較正 確 請問究竟這邊使用現在分詞waving 和holding的原因是什麼? 和逗號有關? 謝謝~ -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 140.112.121.97
推
04/14 17:57, , 1F
是因為正在?
04/14 17:57, 1F
→
04/14 18:52, , 2F
這句話原來應該是 A person dressed in a constume
04/14 18:52, 2F
→
04/14 18:53, , 3F
near a busy street, and waved to drivers and
04/14 18:53, 3F
→
04/14 18:54, , 4F
usually held a sign with a deal to a pizza place,
04/14 18:54, 4F
→
04/14 18:54, , 5F
hair salon or even a tax service.
04/14 18:54, 5F
→
04/14 18:56, , 6F
所以，它應該是把and省略掉，變成分詞構句。
04/14 18:56, 6F
→
04/14 19:23, , 7F
可是都沒動詞了還能省略連接詞嗎
04/14 19:23, 7F
→
04/14 19:23, , 8F
如果是這樣那a person is dressed in的 be-V就要寫出來
04/14 19:23, 8F
→
04/14 20:02, , 9F
恩，你說的對，這樣看來，這句話應該是不合文法。
04/14 20:02, 9F
→
04/14 20:50, , 10F
這個? http://ppt.cc/fM-- 你漏貼前頭部份。冒號後的部
04/14 20:50, 10F
→
04/14 20:50, , 11F
份也確實沒有主要動詞 因為這是用"phrases"的方式
04/14 20:50, 11F
→
04/14 20:55, , 13F
這種表達方式很普遍，多看多接觸，熟了就覺得自然了
04/14 20:55, 13F
→
04/14 21:36, , 14F
thx
04/14 21:36, 14F
推
04/20 01:15, , 15F
dress in 就是動詞 請參考下面連結 2a
04/20 01:15, 15F
→
04/20 01:17, , 17F
不過看完原文 這裡是很正常的名詞片語 :)
04/20 01:17, 17F
‣ 更多 cronaldo17 的文章
文章代碼(AID): #1Dfht8Vd (Eng-Class)
‣ 更多 cronaldo17 的文章
文章代碼(AID): #1Dfht8Vd (Eng-Class)