Re: [閒聊] 閃之軌跡3 製作決定
閃3目前主角未定
但我是支持把黎恩換掉
如果黎恩當主角配上幾個新同伴
以後劇情又要攪和VII班相關共10人以上的夥伴
這個人數問題只有囧
而且又有羈絆系統這因素 不管你前作是什麼派別
如果又要看到黎恩跟新同(ㄏㄡˋ)伴(ㄍㄨㄥ)的劇情 能接受嗎?
如果是走黎恩找回VII斑原本同班同學的路線
閃2玩過一次了 大家還會有新鮮感嗎?而且VII班有一半以上的人沒啥個人魅力...
換新主角的話可以是黎恩小隊(從外傳看起來有隊長階級了)裡的隊員視角
黎恩就變成類似莎拉教官那種存在 可以參戰又不會干涉新劇角色太多
其實最好的選擇是讓皇子當主角去補完帝國西南部劇情
也不用擔心重新填坑的問題 3rd凱文那樣補就很好
但現在的業界走向讓子安這種老牌聲優當新作品的主角感覺很難就是
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 190.109.164.81
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Falcom/M.1450260445.A.214.html
推
12/16 18:10, , 1F
12/16 18:10, 1F
會長當主角以後 就會周旋在眾男角之間(望向羈絆劇情) 沒問題嗎?
推
12/16 18:12, , 2F
12/16 18:12, 2F
→
12/16 18:12, , 3F
12/16 18:12, 3F
→
12/16 18:12, , 4F
12/16 18:12, 4F
跟我想得差不多
推
12/16 18:14, , 5F
12/16 18:14, 5F
→
12/16 18:14, , 6F
12/16 18:14, 6F
→
12/16 18:14, , 7F
12/16 18:14, 7F
我覺得還是沒成長的可能頗多 這種劇情一般都要有個同伴還是對手競爭之類造成成長
可問題是他的那位對手已經....
難道要羅爺負起這個責任嗎?
※ 編輯: ThorFukt (190.109.164.81), 12/16/2015 18:20:13
推
12/16 18:17, , 8F
12/16 18:17, 8F
→
12/16 18:17, , 9F
12/16 18:17, 9F
→
12/16 18:18, , 10F
12/16 18:18, 10F
推
12/16 18:19, , 11F
12/16 18:19, 11F
→
12/16 18:19, , 12F
12/16 18:19, 12F
→
12/16 18:19, , 13F
12/16 18:19, 13F
→
12/16 18:21, , 14F
12/16 18:21, 14F
→
12/16 18:22, , 15F
12/16 18:22, 15F
推
12/16 18:28, , 16F
12/16 18:28, 16F
→
12/16 18:28, , 17F
12/16 18:28, 17F
推
12/16 18:30, , 18F
12/16 18:30, 18F
推
12/16 18:57, , 19F
12/16 18:57, 19F
→
12/16 18:57, , 20F
12/16 18:57, 20F
→
12/16 18:57, , 21F
12/16 18:57, 21F
推
12/16 18:58, , 22F
12/16 18:58, 22F
推
12/16 18:59, , 23F
12/16 18:59, 23F
推
12/16 19:01, , 24F
12/16 19:01, 24F
→
12/16 19:03, , 25F
12/16 19:03, 25F
→
12/16 19:04, , 26F
12/16 19:04, 26F
→
12/16 19:04, , 27F
12/16 19:04, 27F
→
12/16 19:05, , 28F
12/16 19:05, 28F
→
12/16 19:06, , 29F
12/16 19:06, 29F
推
12/16 19:06, , 30F
12/16 19:06, 30F
→
12/16 19:06, , 31F
12/16 19:06, 31F
推
12/16 19:12, , 32F
12/16 19:12, 32F
→
12/16 19:12, , 33F
12/16 19:12, 33F
推
12/16 19:13, , 34F
12/16 19:13, 34F
→
12/16 19:13, , 35F
12/16 19:13, 35F
→
12/16 19:13, , 36F
12/16 19:13, 36F
還有 64 則推文
推
12/17 00:05, , 101F
12/17 00:05, 101F
→
12/17 10:20, , 102F
12/17 10:20, 102F
→
12/17 10:20, , 103F
12/17 10:20, 103F
→
12/17 10:21, , 104F
12/17 10:21, 104F
→
12/17 10:40, , 105F
12/17 10:40, 105F
推
12/17 11:51, , 106F
12/17 11:51, 106F
推
12/17 12:24, , 107F
12/17 12:24, 107F
→
12/17 12:25, , 108F
12/17 12:25, 108F
→
12/17 12:26, , 109F
12/17 12:26, 109F
→
12/17 12:26, , 110F
12/17 12:26, 110F
→
12/17 12:26, , 111F
12/17 12:26, 111F
→
12/17 12:27, , 112F
12/17 12:27, 112F
→
12/17 12:27, , 113F
12/17 12:27, 113F
→
12/17 12:27, , 114F
12/17 12:27, 114F
→
12/17 12:28, , 115F
12/17 12:28, 115F
→
12/17 12:28, , 116F
12/17 12:28, 116F
推
12/17 12:37, , 117F
12/17 12:37, 117F
推
12/17 13:54, , 118F
12/17 13:54, 118F
噓
12/17 14:58, , 119F
12/17 14:58, 119F
→
12/17 14:58, , 120F
12/17 14:58, 120F
推
12/17 19:55, , 121F
12/17 19:55, 121F
推
12/17 19:55, , 122F
12/17 19:55, 122F
推
12/17 19:56, , 123F
12/17 19:56, 123F
推
12/17 20:04, , 124F
12/17 20:04, 124F
推
12/17 20:06, , 125F
12/17 20:06, 125F
推
12/17 20:38, , 126F
12/17 20:38, 126F
推
12/17 20:51, , 127F
12/17 20:51, 127F
→
12/17 20:51, , 128F
12/17 20:51, 128F
→
12/17 22:14, , 129F
12/17 22:14, 129F
推
12/17 22:18, , 130F
12/17 22:18, 130F
推
12/17 23:20, , 131F
12/17 23:20, 131F
推
12/18 13:37, , 132F
12/18 13:37, 132F
→
12/19 18:02, , 133F
12/19 18:02, 133F
→
12/19 18:30, , 134F
12/19 18:30, 134F
推
12/19 20:12, , 135F
12/19 20:12, 135F
→
12/19 21:29, , 136F
12/19 21:29, 136F
→
12/19 21:29, , 137F
12/19 21:29, 137F
推
12/19 21:30, , 138F
12/19 21:30, 138F
推
12/25 11:03, , 139F
12/25 11:03, 139F
→
12/27 16:33, , 140F
12/27 16:33, 140F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 3 篇):
閒聊
58
140