[詢問] Gmail信箱搜尋怎麼這麼差勁??
小弟用gmail也有六、七年了
平時很少找email 對google的搜尋也深具信心
也是支持Android的
但今天實在讓我氣到 今天一早有150多封email到我信箱
都是客戶的調查回函 我只是要找其中一封客戶編號 2388 的回信
結果搜尋 2388, Gmail竟然跟我講找沒有半封
害我以為對方沒回 仔細用肉眼找
才發現原來是客戶回信寫 from2388 (沒空格)
這樣Gmail就找不到???
我不死心 乾脆搜尋from2388 結果gmail才可以找到
哇哩 太誇張了吧 筆記本程式裡面的搜尋都可以找到部份字串
gmail竟然沒有辦法???
我都不敢想像過去我有多少搜尋gmail 都是錯誤的搜尋結果
ps. 找到一個可以建議這個功能給gmail的網頁了
還請大家一起來建議google補完gmail的搜尋能力
https://mail.google.com/support/bin/static.py?page=suggestions.cs
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 140.114.138.111
→
11/09 07:26, , 1F
11/09 07:26, 1F
→
11/09 07:28, , 2F
11/09 07:28, 2F
※ 編輯: abram 來自: 140.114.138.111 (11/09 07:30)
→
11/09 07:58, , 3F
11/09 07:58, 3F
→
11/09 07:58, , 4F
11/09 07:58, 4F
→
11/09 10:46, , 5F
11/09 10:46, 5F
→
11/09 11:06, , 6F
11/09 11:06, 6F
→
11/09 11:20, , 7F
11/09 11:20, 7F
噓
11/09 11:51, , 8F
11/09 11:51, 8F
推
11/09 11:53, , 9F
11/09 11:53, 9F
→
11/09 11:53, , 10F
11/09 11:53, 10F
→
11/09 11:57, , 11F
11/09 11:57, 11F
推
11/09 11:58, , 12F
11/09 11:58, 12F
推
11/09 12:13, , 13F
11/09 12:13, 13F
推
11/09 12:15, , 14F
11/09 12:15, 14F
推
11/09 12:18, , 15F
11/09 12:18, 15F
→
11/09 12:18, , 16F
11/09 12:18, 16F
→
11/09 12:19, , 17F
11/09 12:19, 17F
→
11/09 12:19, , 18F
11/09 12:19, 18F
推
11/09 12:34, , 19F
11/09 12:34, 19F
→
11/09 14:27, , 20F
11/09 14:27, 20F
→
11/09 14:28, , 21F
11/09 14:28, 21F
推
11/09 15:08, , 22F
11/09 15:08, 22F
→
11/09 15:08, , 23F
11/09 15:08, 23F
→
11/09 15:11, , 24F
11/09 15:11, 24F
→
11/09 15:12, , 25F
11/09 15:12, 25F
→
11/09 15:12, , 26F
11/09 15:12, 26F
→
11/09 15:14, , 27F
11/09 15:14, 27F
推
11/09 15:17, , 28F
11/09 15:17, 28F
→
11/09 15:53, , 29F
11/09 15:53, 29F
噓
11/09 15:54, , 30F
11/09 15:54, 30F
推
11/09 16:08, , 31F
11/09 16:08, 31F
→
11/09 18:15, , 32F
11/09 18:15, 32F
→
11/09 18:45, , 33F
11/09 18:45, 33F
→
11/09 19:13, , 34F
11/09 19:13, 34F
※ 編輯: abram 來自: 140.114.138.111 (11/09 19:17)
推
11/09 21:08, , 35F
11/09 21:08, 35F
→
11/09 21:09, , 36F
11/09 21:09, 36F
→
11/09 21:09, , 37F
11/09 21:09, 37F
→
11/09 21:14, , 38F
11/09 21:14, 38F
→
11/09 21:14, , 39F
11/09 21:14, 39F
→
11/09 21:15, , 40F
11/09 21:15, 40F
推
11/09 21:16, , 41F
11/09 21:16, 41F
→
11/09 21:17, , 42F
11/09 21:17, 42F
→
11/09 21:18, , 43F
11/09 21:18, 43F
→
11/09 21:20, , 44F
11/09 21:20, 44F
→
11/09 21:54, , 45F
11/09 21:54, 45F
推
11/09 22:29, , 46F
11/09 22:29, 46F
推
11/09 23:09, , 47F
11/09 23:09, 47F
噓
11/10 02:23, , 48F
11/10 02:23, 48F
推
11/10 02:30, , 49F
11/10 02:30, 49F
推
11/10 17:30, , 50F
11/10 17:30, 50F
→
11/10 23:00, , 51F
11/10 23:00, 51F
→
11/10 23:01, , 52F
11/10 23:01, 52F
→
11/10 23:02, , 53F
11/10 23:02, 53F
→
11/10 23:03, , 54F
11/10 23:03, 54F
推
11/11 00:22, , 55F
11/11 00:22, 55F
→
11/11 19:08, , 56F
11/11 19:08, 56F
推
11/12 01:31, , 57F
11/12 01:31, 57F
→
11/12 06:42, , 58F
11/12 06:42, 58F
→
11/14 11:50, , 59F
11/14 11:50, 59F
推
11/14 20:49, , 60F
11/14 20:49, 60F
→
11/14 20:49, , 61F
11/14 20:49, 61F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):