[新聞] 都是they的錯?法律學者痛批陳景峻:令人感到噁心憤怒消失
SET News
都是they的錯?法律學者痛批陳景峻:令人感到噁心憤怒
針對內湖女童案,台北市副市長陳景峻今(29)日表示,殺童犯30幾歲了,可是都沒工作
、是個啃老族,他質疑「嫌犯的家庭竟然能通融30幾歲啃老族,且沒有任何人替兇手對社
會說一聲抱歉,這家庭是不是要不要負一些責任?」對此,有學者痛批,陳景峻在台北市
政府記者會公然指責王嫌的家人要求其出來道歉負責,同樣令人氣憤至極,應該譴責陳景
峻的惡質言論!
國立政治大學法學院副教授劉宏恩說,內湖王嫌殘殺女童令人髮指,氣憤至極。但是陳景
峻在台北市政府記者會公然指責王嫌的家人要求其出來道歉負責,同樣令人氣憤至極。
他指出,姑且不提王嫌的家人同樣曾遭到他暴力毆打,根本無能力約束他;也先不論市府
竟然公然違反法治原理,散播情緒性仇恨性的「株連九族」連坐思想;但,單單是台北市
政府身為精神病患醫療追蹤及暴力犯罪防治的主管權責機關,竟然在事件發生之後公然表
態「都是they的錯」,這就足以「令人感到噁心憤怒!」
劉宏恩痛批,家裡有精神智能障礙者是多麼令人痛苦而經常感到無力無能的狀況,哪個家
庭有能力單獨承擔?台北市政府不知道這在文明國家都是由政府社會福利措施要來共同面
對的嗎。請問陳副市長和柯P,請問你們究竟覺得「家人」應該要如何負責?應該把病人
用鐵鍊綁在家裡,還是跟以前一樣,把他們送到「龍發堂」去關起來大家眼不見為淨就好
?
劉宏恩說,與其要「家人」負責,看台北市政府乾脆請「老天爺」出來道歉負責好了----
為什麼老天爺你要讓某些人天生有這些病和暴力傾向!若是能夠選擇,誰願意選擇自己的
家人有精神障礙或暴力傾向?若是有能力勸導約束,誰會縱容自己家人出去殺人犯罪?
他說,同樣的道理,對於「沒有法治觀念」、「不想檢討自己醫政社政警政哪裡出錯」、
「只擅長用情緒性言論治國」、「無能力理解病人家屬處境」的政客,我也不會要求你們
的家屬來替你們負責。你們是如何成為這種等級的政客,你們的家人又怎麼可能替你負責
呢?
王嫌造孽殘殺四歲小妹當然可惡至極,但是政府官員公然發表這種反文明、反法治、濫用
公權力發言管道霸凌家屬的卸責言論,傷害的不是一個四歲小妹,而是整個社會。
http://www.setn.com/News.aspx?NewsID=133894
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 140.112.25.105
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1459230716.A.DE7.html
→
03/29 13:52, , 1F
03/29 13:52, 1F
→
03/29 13:52, , 2F
03/29 13:52, 2F
噓
03/29 13:52, , 3F
03/29 13:52, 3F
→
03/29 13:52, , 4F
03/29 13:52, 4F
→
03/29 13:52, , 5F
03/29 13:52, 5F
噓
03/29 13:52, , 6F
03/29 13:52, 6F
推
03/29 13:53, , 7F
03/29 13:53, 7F
推
03/29 13:53, , 8F
03/29 13:53, 8F
→
03/29 13:53, , 9F
03/29 13:53, 9F
推
03/29 13:53, , 10F
03/29 13:53, 10F
推
03/29 13:53, , 11F
03/29 13:53, 11F
→
03/29 13:53, , 12F
03/29 13:53, 12F
噓
03/29 13:53, , 13F
03/29 13:53, 13F
→
03/29 13:53, , 14F
03/29 13:53, 14F
推
03/29 13:53, , 15F
03/29 13:53, 15F
推
03/29 13:53, , 16F
03/29 13:53, 16F
→
03/29 13:54, , 17F
03/29 13:54, 17F
推
03/29 13:54, , 18F
03/29 13:54, 18F
→
03/29 13:54, , 19F
03/29 13:54, 19F
噓
03/29 13:54, , 20F
03/29 13:54, 20F
噓
03/29 13:54, , 21F
03/29 13:54, 21F
推
03/29 13:54, , 22F
03/29 13:54, 22F
→
03/29 13:55, , 23F
03/29 13:55, 23F
→
03/29 13:55, , 24F
03/29 13:55, 24F
→
03/29 13:55, , 25F
03/29 13:55, 25F
推
03/29 13:55, , 26F
03/29 13:55, 26F
→
03/29 13:55, , 27F
03/29 13:55, 27F
→
03/29 13:55, , 28F
03/29 13:55, 28F
→
03/29 13:55, , 29F
03/29 13:55, 29F
→
03/29 13:55, , 30F
03/29 13:55, 30F
推
03/29 13:55, , 31F
03/29 13:55, 31F
→
03/29 13:55, , 32F
03/29 13:55, 32F
→
03/29 13:55, , 33F
03/29 13:55, 33F
推
03/29 13:56, , 34F
03/29 13:56, 34F
→
03/29 13:56, , 35F
03/29 13:56, 35F
噓
03/29 13:56, , 36F
03/29 13:56, 36F
推
03/29 13:56, , 37F
03/29 13:56, 37F
推
03/29 13:56, , 38F
03/29 13:56, 38F
推
03/29 13:56, , 39F
03/29 13:56, 39F
還有 66 則推文
推
03/29 14:25, , 106F
03/29 14:25, 106F
推
03/29 14:27, , 107F
03/29 14:27, 107F
噓
03/29 14:29, , 108F
03/29 14:29, 108F
噓
03/29 14:32, , 109F
03/29 14:32, 109F
→
03/29 14:32, , 110F
03/29 14:32, 110F
推
03/29 14:33, , 111F
03/29 14:33, 111F
→
03/29 14:33, , 112F
03/29 14:33, 112F
推
03/29 14:35, , 113F
03/29 14:35, 113F
推
03/29 14:36, , 114F
03/29 14:36, 114F
→
03/29 14:36, , 115F
03/29 14:36, 115F
推
03/29 14:46, , 116F
03/29 14:46, 116F
推
03/29 14:52, , 117F
03/29 14:52, 117F
噓
03/29 14:54, , 118F
03/29 14:54, 118F
推
03/29 15:07, , 119F
03/29 15:07, 119F
→
03/29 15:12, , 120F
03/29 15:12, 120F
→
03/29 15:12, , 121F
03/29 15:12, 121F
推
03/29 15:13, , 122F
03/29 15:13, 122F
推
03/29 15:16, , 123F
03/29 15:16, 123F
推
03/29 15:24, , 124F
03/29 15:24, 124F
推
03/29 15:29, , 125F
03/29 15:29, 125F
噓
03/29 15:34, , 126F
03/29 15:34, 126F
→
03/29 15:38, , 127F
03/29 15:38, 127F
→
03/29 15:38, , 128F
03/29 15:38, 128F
推
03/29 15:39, , 129F
03/29 15:39, 129F
推
03/29 15:41, , 130F
03/29 15:41, 130F
推
03/29 15:54, , 131F
03/29 15:54, 131F
→
03/29 15:54, , 132F
03/29 15:54, 132F
噓
03/29 16:04, , 133F
03/29 16:04, 133F
→
03/29 16:04, , 134F
03/29 16:04, 134F
→
03/29 16:04, , 135F
03/29 16:04, 135F
推
03/29 16:05, , 136F
03/29 16:05, 136F
推
03/29 16:23, , 137F
03/29 16:23, 137F
→
03/29 16:23, , 138F
03/29 16:23, 138F
→
03/29 16:46, , 139F
03/29 16:46, 139F
推
03/29 16:50, , 140F
03/29 16:50, 140F
推
03/29 17:19, , 141F
03/29 17:19, 141F
推
03/29 17:31, , 142F
03/29 17:31, 142F
推
03/29 17:38, , 143F
03/29 17:38, 143F
推
03/29 19:50, , 144F
03/29 19:50, 144F
推
03/31 19:43, , 145F
03/31 19:43, 145F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 3 篇):