[新聞] 36K上班族「一例一休」加班費 一算差很大消失
1.媒體來源:
蘋果日報
2.完整新聞標題:
36K上班族「一例一休」加班費 一算差很大
3.完整新聞內文:
最近勞工大事就是關於勞基法修正案,現行《勞基法》規定,「勞工正常工作時間,每日
不得超過8小時,每週不得超過40小時」,但《公務員服務法》卻明定,「公務員每週應
有二日之休息,作為例假」,《勞基法》未明定勞工可週休二日,有僱主刻意減少勞工每
日上班時數,繼續讓勞工維持每週上6天班。勞動部為此修法,若通過,原要還勞工的7天
國定假日,也都會再取消。
《蘋果日報》報導,根據勞動部規劃,例假與休息日差別在於,例假僅天災、事變、突發
事件才可要求勞工銷假上班,休息日只要徵得勞工同意就可上班;不過僱主須付加班費,
除原本工資外,加班頭2小時各可再獲1又1/3(即4/3)加班費,2小時之後可獲得1又2/3
(即5/3)加班費,且一次至少發給4小時,不滿1小時也要發4 小時,而實際到底怎麼算
,舉36K上班族的加班費算給您看。(即時新聞中心/綜合報導)
Q:我在例假或休息日加班8小時,加班費該怎麼算?
A:假設有勞工月薪3萬6千元,每小時工資額150元。
●若在休息日加班8小時
★現行加班費規定為 150×1/3×2(前2小時)+150×2/3×6(後6小時)=700元
★未來加班費規定為 150×4/3×2+150×5/3×6=1900元
●若在例假日加班8小時
★加班費規定為150×8=1200元+1天補假
4.完整新聞連結 (或短網址):
http://www.appledaily.com.tw/realtimenews/article/life/20160629/896576/
5.備註:
真那麼多人反對一例一休? 還是黨工梭哈在帶風向?
現在看起來明明就比以前的一例好
以前假日加班還比平日加班少錢...
何況無良老板就算改兩例假還是可以叫你來加班啦
重點是勞基法的罰則要修改吧
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 61.60.129.33
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1467168378.A.A71.html
→
06/29 10:46, , 1F
06/29 10:46, 1F
→
06/29 10:47, , 2F
06/29 10:47, 2F
噓
06/29 10:47, , 3F
06/29 10:47, 3F
→
06/29 10:47, , 4F
06/29 10:47, 4F
推
06/29 10:48, , 5F
06/29 10:48, 5F
噓
06/29 10:48, , 6F
06/29 10:48, 6F
推
06/29 10:48, , 7F
06/29 10:48, 7F
推
06/29 10:48, , 8F
06/29 10:48, 8F
噓
06/29 10:48, , 9F
06/29 10:48, 9F
推
06/29 10:48, , 10F
06/29 10:48, 10F
→
06/29 10:49, , 11F
06/29 10:49, 11F
噓
06/29 10:49, , 12F
06/29 10:49, 12F
→
06/29 10:49, , 13F
06/29 10:49, 13F
→
06/29 10:49, , 14F
06/29 10:49, 14F
→
06/29 10:50, , 15F
06/29 10:50, 15F
噓
06/29 10:50, , 16F
06/29 10:50, 16F
→
06/29 10:50, , 17F
06/29 10:50, 17F
噓
06/29 10:50, , 18F
06/29 10:50, 18F
噓
06/29 10:50, , 19F
06/29 10:50, 19F
噓
06/29 10:50, , 20F
06/29 10:50, 20F
噓
06/29 10:50, , 21F
06/29 10:50, 21F
噓
06/29 10:50, , 22F
06/29 10:50, 22F
噓
06/29 10:50, , 23F
06/29 10:50, 23F
→
06/29 10:51, , 24F
06/29 10:51, 24F
→
06/29 10:51, , 25F
06/29 10:51, 25F
→
06/29 10:51, , 26F
06/29 10:51, 26F
噓
06/29 10:51, , 27F
06/29 10:51, 27F
噓
06/29 10:51, , 28F
06/29 10:51, 28F
→
06/29 10:51, , 29F
06/29 10:51, 29F
推
06/29 10:51, , 30F
06/29 10:51, 30F
→
06/29 10:52, , 31F
06/29 10:52, 31F
→
06/29 10:52, , 32F
06/29 10:52, 32F
推
06/29 10:52, , 33F
06/29 10:52, 33F
噓
06/29 10:52, , 34F
06/29 10:52, 34F
→
06/29 10:52, , 35F
06/29 10:52, 35F
推
06/29 10:53, , 36F
06/29 10:53, 36F
→
06/29 10:53, , 37F
06/29 10:53, 37F
→
06/29 10:53, , 38F
06/29 10:53, 38F
噓
06/29 10:53, , 39F
06/29 10:53, 39F
還有 47 則推文
→
06/29 11:27, , 87F
06/29 11:27, 87F
→
06/29 11:28, , 88F
06/29 11:28, 88F
→
06/29 11:30, , 89F
06/29 11:30, 89F
噓
06/29 11:31, , 90F
06/29 11:31, 90F
→
06/29 11:31, , 91F
06/29 11:31, 91F
→
06/29 11:32, , 92F
06/29 11:32, 92F
推
06/29 11:47, , 93F
06/29 11:47, 93F
噓
06/29 11:59, , 94F
06/29 11:59, 94F
→
06/29 11:59, , 95F
06/29 11:59, 95F
噓
06/29 12:00, , 96F
06/29 12:00, 96F
噓
06/29 12:02, , 97F
06/29 12:02, 97F
推
06/29 12:04, , 98F
06/29 12:04, 98F
噓
06/29 12:06, , 99F
06/29 12:06, 99F
噓
06/29 12:08, , 100F
06/29 12:08, 100F
噓
06/29 12:13, , 101F
06/29 12:13, 101F
噓
06/29 12:13, , 102F
06/29 12:13, 102F
噓
06/29 12:14, , 103F
06/29 12:14, 103F
→
06/29 12:14, , 104F
06/29 12:14, 104F
噓
06/29 12:15, , 105F
06/29 12:15, 105F
噓
06/29 12:17, , 106F
06/29 12:17, 106F
→
06/29 12:19, , 107F
06/29 12:19, 107F
噓
06/29 12:19, , 108F
06/29 12:19, 108F
噓
06/29 12:28, , 109F
06/29 12:28, 109F
→
06/29 12:30, , 110F
06/29 12:30, 110F
噓
06/29 12:32, , 111F
06/29 12:32, 111F
→
06/29 12:36, , 112F
06/29 12:36, 112F
噓
06/29 12:44, , 113F
06/29 12:44, 113F
噓
06/29 12:45, , 114F
06/29 12:45, 114F
噓
06/29 12:52, , 115F
06/29 12:52, 115F
推
06/29 13:43, , 116F
06/29 13:43, 116F
噓
06/29 13:52, , 117F
06/29 13:52, 117F
→
06/29 13:52, , 118F
06/29 13:52, 118F
推
06/29 13:57, , 119F
06/29 13:57, 119F
→
06/29 13:58, , 120F
06/29 13:58, 120F
噓
06/29 14:07, , 121F
06/29 14:07, 121F
→
06/29 14:08, , 122F
06/29 14:08, 122F
噓
06/29 14:42, , 123F
06/29 14:42, 123F
噓
06/29 17:47, , 124F
06/29 17:47, 124F
→
06/29 20:13, , 125F
06/29 20:13, 125F
噓
06/30 14:00, , 126F
06/30 14:00, 126F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 4 篇):