[新聞] 電業法「看攏嘸」?王定宇推7張圖讓你懂消失
1.媒體來源:
ettoday
2.完整新聞標題:
電業法「看攏嘸」?王定宇推7張圖讓你懂
3.完整新聞內文:
針對蔡政府力推的《電業法》民眾反應「看攏嘸」,以及有傳言一但修法通過後,電價將
上漲一事,民進黨立委王定宇2日推出「破解版懶人包」,強調電業自由化就像公路客運
、電信業、油品市場一樣,競爭將使價格降低,「台塑的油價從未比國營的中油高」。
《電業法》修正草案推出後,成為蔡政府力推的新政,沒想到卻引發台電員工反彈,日前
還聚集行政院抗議。此外,國民黨主席洪秀柱也痛批,整部電業法只讓特高壓用戶擁有購
電選擇權,如此經濟弱勢者將會沒有自由地選到高價的電,「政府假借自由化之名,圖利
財團,傷害人民」。
對此,王定宇推出懶人包指出,本次修正是為了建構電力市場的公平競爭環境,修正條文
均未規劃台電公司發電部門民營化,自然不會轉賣,更不會圖利財團;而不分大戶、小戶
,全民都享有購電選擇權,可依據自身喜好來選擇供電來源及種類。
關於電價部分,懶人包也舉了台塑的例子,強調「油品市場開放競爭後,台塑的油價也從
未比國營的中油高」。推動電業改革,可促使電業有更佳的誘因提升效率及技術創新,帶
給民眾更多優質的選擇機會;同時進步帶來經營成本降低,在外在環境不變的情況下,電
價還可能會下降。
4.完整新聞連結 (或短網址):
http://www.ettoday.net/news/20161002/785834.htm
5.備註:
最高票
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 180.177.25.41
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1475409896.A.72B.html
→
10/02 20:05, , 1F
10/02 20:05, 1F
噓
10/02 20:05, , 2F
10/02 20:05, 2F
推
10/02 20:06, , 3F
10/02 20:06, 3F
噓
10/02 20:06, , 4F
10/02 20:06, 4F
→
10/02 20:06, , 5F
10/02 20:06, 5F
噓
10/02 20:06, , 6F
10/02 20:06, 6F
噓
10/02 20:06, , 7F
10/02 20:06, 7F
→
10/02 20:07, , 8F
10/02 20:07, 8F
噓
10/02 20:07, , 9F
10/02 20:07, 9F
→
10/02 20:07, , 10F
10/02 20:07, 10F
→
10/02 20:07, , 11F
10/02 20:07, 11F
→
10/02 20:07, , 12F
10/02 20:07, 12F
推
10/02 20:07, , 13F
10/02 20:07, 13F
→
10/02 20:07, , 14F
10/02 20:07, 14F
推
10/02 20:07, , 15F
10/02 20:07, 15F
→
10/02 20:07, , 16F
10/02 20:07, 16F
噓
10/02 20:07, , 17F
10/02 20:07, 17F
噓
10/02 20:07, , 18F
10/02 20:07, 18F
噓
10/02 20:08, , 19F
10/02 20:08, 19F
→
10/02 20:08, , 20F
10/02 20:08, 20F
噓
10/02 20:09, , 21F
10/02 20:09, 21F
→
10/02 20:09, , 22F
10/02 20:09, 22F
噓
10/02 20:09, , 23F
10/02 20:09, 23F
噓
10/02 20:09, , 24F
10/02 20:09, 24F
推
10/02 20:09, , 25F
10/02 20:09, 25F
→
10/02 20:09, , 26F
10/02 20:09, 26F
→
10/02 20:09, , 27F
10/02 20:09, 27F
→
10/02 20:09, , 28F
10/02 20:09, 28F
噓
10/02 20:09, , 29F
10/02 20:09, 29F
噓
10/02 20:10, , 30F
10/02 20:10, 30F
→
10/02 20:10, , 31F
10/02 20:10, 31F
噓
10/02 20:10, , 32F
10/02 20:10, 32F
噓
10/02 20:10, , 33F
10/02 20:10, 33F
→
10/02 20:10, , 34F
10/02 20:10, 34F
→
10/02 20:11, , 35F
10/02 20:11, 35F
→
10/02 20:11, , 36F
10/02 20:11, 36F
→
10/02 20:11, , 37F
10/02 20:11, 37F
→
10/02 20:11, , 38F
10/02 20:11, 38F
→
10/02 20:11, , 39F
10/02 20:11, 39F
還有 100 則推文
噓
10/02 21:35, , 140F
10/02 21:35, 140F
→
10/02 21:35, , 141F
10/02 21:35, 141F
噓
10/02 21:38, , 142F
10/02 21:38, 142F
→
10/02 21:47, , 143F
10/02 21:47, 143F
噓
10/02 21:49, , 144F
10/02 21:49, 144F
噓
10/02 21:52, , 145F
10/02 21:52, 145F
噓
10/02 21:53, , 146F
10/02 21:53, 146F
推
10/02 21:57, , 147F
10/02 21:57, 147F
→
10/02 21:59, , 148F
10/02 21:59, 148F
推
10/02 22:03, , 149F
10/02 22:03, 149F
噓
10/02 22:04, , 150F
10/02 22:04, 150F
噓
10/02 22:05, , 151F
10/02 22:05, 151F
→
10/02 22:06, , 152F
10/02 22:06, 152F
→
10/02 22:07, , 153F
10/02 22:07, 153F
→
10/02 22:07, , 154F
10/02 22:07, 154F
噓
10/02 22:10, , 155F
10/02 22:10, 155F
推
10/02 22:16, , 156F
10/02 22:16, 156F
→
10/02 22:16, , 157F
10/02 22:16, 157F
噓
10/02 22:20, , 158F
10/02 22:20, 158F
噓
10/02 22:32, , 159F
10/02 22:32, 159F
噓
10/02 22:40, , 160F
10/02 22:40, 160F
噓
10/02 22:45, , 161F
10/02 22:45, 161F
噓
10/02 22:47, , 162F
10/02 22:47, 162F
→
10/02 22:53, , 163F
10/02 22:53, 163F
噓
10/02 23:00, , 164F
10/02 23:00, 164F
噓
10/02 23:03, , 165F
10/02 23:03, 165F
噓
10/02 23:03, , 166F
10/02 23:03, 166F
噓
10/02 23:23, , 167F
10/02 23:23, 167F
噓
10/02 23:41, , 168F
10/02 23:41, 168F
→
10/03 00:04, , 169F
10/03 00:04, 169F
→
10/03 01:09, , 170F
10/03 01:09, 170F
噓
10/03 01:25, , 171F
10/03 01:25, 171F
→
10/03 01:26, , 172F
10/03 01:26, 172F
噓
10/03 15:15, , 173F
10/03 15:15, 173F
噓
10/21 14:26, , 174F
10/21 14:26, 174F
→
10/21 14:26, , 175F
10/21 14:26, 175F
噓
10/21 14:29, , 176F
10/21 14:29, 176F
噓
10/21 14:53, , 177F
10/21 14:53, 177F
噓
10/21 14:54, , 178F
10/21 14:54, 178F
噓
10/21 20:55, , 179F
10/21 20:55, 179F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 7 篇):