[問卦] 有沒有台灣鋼筆很敢開價的八卦?消失
三文堂系列的鋼筆很敢開價
鋼筆最重要的筆尖是進口德國的
其餘筆身自行製造 就打上made in taiwan的名號
入門款在台灣賣800 進階款賣1800
跑到日本亞馬遜翻倍賣錢 媲美高級品牌
台灣賣800的 到日本要賣1600
賣1800的 到日本要5000起跳
白金牌 筆尖筆身3776 全日本製造只要3000就有
台灣拼裝車 筆身透明廉價塑膠要賣5000
連做筆尖的能力都沒有就開價5000
價錢媲美日本製鋼筆21k金
有沒有台灣鋼筆很敢開價的八卦?
自信到底在哪裡?
日本亞馬遜 三文堂鋼筆價錢 https://goo.gl/SP1cXc
補個八卦 就是三文堂鋼筆有出一款國民黨黨徽的塑膠鋼筆
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 1.200.234.68
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1476328504.A.82A.html
→
10/13 11:16, , 1F
10/13 11:16, 1F
推
10/13 11:16, , 2F
10/13 11:16, 2F
→
10/13 11:16, , 3F
10/13 11:16, 3F
推
10/13 11:16, , 4F
10/13 11:16, 4F
→
10/13 11:16, , 5F
10/13 11:16, 5F
推
10/13 11:16, , 6F
10/13 11:16, 6F
推
10/13 11:16, , 7F
10/13 11:16, 7F
→
10/13 11:16, , 8F
10/13 11:16, 8F
推
10/13 11:17, , 9F
10/13 11:17, 9F
推
10/13 11:17, , 10F
10/13 11:17, 10F
推
10/13 11:17, , 11F
10/13 11:17, 11F
→
10/13 11:17, , 12F
10/13 11:17, 12F
→
10/13 11:18, , 13F
10/13 11:18, 13F
推
10/13 11:18, , 14F
10/13 11:18, 14F
※ 編輯: HIVer (1.200.234.68), 10/13/2016 11:20:21
推
10/13 11:19, , 15F
10/13 11:19, 15F
推
10/13 11:20, , 16F
10/13 11:20, 16F
推
10/13 11:21, , 17F
10/13 11:21, 17F
噓
10/13 11:21, , 18F
10/13 11:21, 18F
→
10/13 11:21, , 19F
10/13 11:21, 19F
→
10/13 11:22, , 20F
10/13 11:22, 20F
推
10/13 11:22, , 21F
10/13 11:22, 21F
→
10/13 11:22, , 22F
10/13 11:22, 22F
推
10/13 11:23, , 23F
10/13 11:23, 23F
推
10/13 11:23, , 24F
10/13 11:23, 24F
噓
10/13 11:24, , 25F
10/13 11:24, 25F
→
10/13 11:26, , 26F
10/13 11:26, 26F
→
10/13 11:26, , 27F
10/13 11:26, 27F
推
10/13 11:26, , 28F
10/13 11:26, 28F
→
10/13 11:27, , 29F
10/13 11:27, 29F
推
10/13 11:29, , 30F
10/13 11:29, 30F
推
10/13 11:31, , 31F
10/13 11:31, 31F
噓
10/13 11:31, , 32F
10/13 11:31, 32F
推
10/13 11:36, , 33F
10/13 11:36, 33F
推
10/13 11:43, , 34F
10/13 11:43, 34F
推
10/13 11:46, , 35F
10/13 11:46, 35F
推
10/13 11:55, , 36F
10/13 11:55, 36F
→
10/13 12:25, , 37F
10/13 12:25, 37F
噓
10/13 12:25, , 38F
10/13 12:25, 38F
噓
10/13 13:25, , 39F
10/13 13:25, 39F
噓
10/13 13:41, , 40F
10/13 13:41, 40F
噓
10/13 13:49, , 41F
10/13 13:49, 41F
推
10/13 13:56, , 42F
10/13 13:56, 42F
噓
10/13 15:36, , 43F
10/13 15:36, 43F
→
10/13 15:37, , 44F
10/13 15:37, 44F
→
10/13 16:20, , 45F
10/13 16:20, 45F
→
10/13 17:52, , 46F
10/13 17:52, 46F
噓
10/13 20:18, , 47F
10/13 20:18, 47F
噓
10/13 23:58, , 48F
10/13 23:58, 48F
噓
10/14 00:12, , 49F
10/14 00:12, 49F
噓
10/14 00:13, , 50F
10/14 00:13, 50F
噓
10/14 00:37, , 51F
10/14 00:37, 51F
→
10/14 00:37, , 52F
10/14 00:37, 52F
→
10/14 00:48, , 53F
10/14 00:48, 53F
噓
10/14 02:14, , 54F
10/14 02:14, 54F
噓
10/14 09:40, , 55F
10/14 09:40, 55F
噓
10/14 10:20, , 56F
10/14 10:20, 56F
推
10/14 10:24, , 57F
10/14 10:24, 57F
→
10/14 10:25, , 58F
10/14 10:25, 58F
噓
10/14 12:51, , 59F
10/14 12:51, 59F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):