[問卦] 指考題目全部改成申論題會發生什麼事?消失
Bon apres-midi mes cheris !
法國人的高考都是申論題
如果台灣也全面改成申論題
是否有助於學生論述、証明和思辨能力
也強迫能力不足的人提早就業呢?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 223.142.194.138
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1483001005.A.46A.html
→
12/29 16:43, , 1F
12/29 16:43, 1F
→
12/29 16:43, , 2F
12/29 16:43, 2F
→
12/29 16:43, , 3F
12/29 16:43, 3F
→
12/29 16:44, , 4F
12/29 16:44, 4F
推
12/29 16:44, , 5F
12/29 16:44, 5F
→
12/29 16:44, , 6F
12/29 16:44, 6F
→
12/29 16:44, , 7F
12/29 16:44, 7F
→
12/29 16:44, , 8F
12/29 16:44, 8F
→
12/29 16:44, , 9F
12/29 16:44, 9F
我知道沒全部啦,只是個假設思考
※ 編輯: fantasibear (223.142.194.138), 12/29/2016 16:46:12
推
12/29 16:45, , 10F
12/29 16:45, 10F
作文不等於申論文
推
12/29 16:45, , 11F
12/29 16:45, 11F
推
12/29 16:45, , 12F
12/29 16:45, 12F
推
12/29 16:46, , 13F
12/29 16:46, 13F
推
12/29 16:46, , 14F
12/29 16:46, 14F
推
12/29 16:47, , 15F
12/29 16:47, 15F
→
12/29 16:48, , 16F
12/29 16:48, 16F
作文不等於申論文
推
12/29 16:49, , 17F
12/29 16:49, 17F
作文不等於申論文
→
12/29 16:50, , 18F
12/29 16:50, 18F
推
12/29 16:50, , 19F
12/29 16:50, 19F
作文不等於申論文
推
12/29 16:51, , 20F
12/29 16:51, 20F
※ 編輯: fantasibear (223.142.194.138), 12/29/2016 16:52:00
→
12/29 16:52, , 21F
12/29 16:52, 21F
背形式也只是準備,真正面對題目需要動腦筋
還要對題目相關的理論和定義或公式熟稔
※ 編輯: fantasibear (223.142.194.138), 12/29/2016 16:54:03
推
12/29 16:53, , 22F
12/29 16:53, 22F
→
12/29 16:53, , 23F
12/29 16:53, 23F
推
12/29 16:54, , 24F
12/29 16:54, 24F
記誦不完全是壞事!重點在論述能力
何況為指考準備的申論訓練不等於國家考試的申論
→
12/29 16:54, , 25F
12/29 16:54, 25F
→
12/29 16:54, , 26F
12/29 16:54, 26F
推
12/29 16:54, , 27F
12/29 16:54, 27F
推
12/29 16:57, , 28F
12/29 16:57, 28F
推
12/29 16:57, , 29F
12/29 16:57, 29F
噓
12/29 16:59, , 30F
12/29 16:59, 30F
推
12/29 17:00, , 31F
12/29 17:00, 31F
推
12/29 17:01, , 32F
12/29 17:01, 32F
推
12/29 17:05, , 33F
12/29 17:05, 33F
→
12/29 17:06, , 34F
12/29 17:06, 34F
→
12/29 17:07, , 35F
12/29 17:07, 35F
像國文和英文就不是全部,不過同一大題最後還是會要寫問答題!
申論有很多種型態,
何況高中的申論方式不等於大學或國家考試的申論
你才擺明先入為主
推
12/29 17:17, , 36F
12/29 17:17, 36F
→
12/29 17:19, , 37F
12/29 17:19, 37F
依照你這樣結論的話,那所有人類知識不也都是主觀的嗎?
推
12/29 17:37, , 38F
12/29 17:37, 38F
→
12/29 17:37, , 39F
12/29 17:37, 39F
我有朋友是法國高中哲學教師,
他可是很期待閱卷評分的那1-2週
→
12/29 17:39, , 40F
12/29 17:39, 40F
※ 編輯: fantasibear (223.142.194.138), 12/29/2016 17:45:01
推
12/29 17:46, , 41F
12/29 17:46, 41F
何謂「主觀」,主觀就是偏見嗎?請試申論
※ 編輯: fantasibear (223.142.194.138), 12/29/2016 17:49:26
推
12/29 17:49, , 42F
12/29 17:49, 42F
→
12/29 18:09, , 43F
12/29 18:09, 43F
原來目前指考問答題和論證題的評論老師都看最後一句啊?
推
12/29 18:14, , 44F
12/29 18:14, 44F
→
12/29 18:14, , 45F
12/29 18:14, 45F
推
12/29 18:14, , 46F
12/29 18:14, 46F
→
12/29 18:14, , 47F
12/29 18:14, 47F
→
12/29 18:14, , 48F
12/29 18:14, 48F
→
12/29 18:14, , 49F
12/29 18:14, 49F
→
12/29 18:14, , 50F
12/29 18:14, 50F
→
12/29 18:15, , 51F
12/29 18:15, 51F
→
12/29 18:15, , 52F
12/29 18:15, 52F
→
12/29 18:15, , 53F
12/29 18:15, 53F
→
12/29 18:15, , 54F
12/29 18:15, 54F
※ 編輯: fantasibear (223.142.194.138), 12/29/2016 18:18:51
→
12/29 18:17, , 55F
12/29 18:17, 55F
→
12/29 18:17, , 56F
12/29 18:17, 56F
推
12/29 18:20, , 57F
12/29 18:20, 57F
噓
12/29 18:28, , 58F
12/29 18:28, 58F
推
12/29 18:45, , 59F
12/29 18:45, 59F
推
12/29 18:48, , 60F
12/29 18:48, 60F
→
12/29 18:49, , 61F
12/29 18:49, 61F
→
12/29 18:50, , 62F
12/29 18:50, 62F
推
12/29 19:03, , 63F
12/29 19:03, 63F
推
12/29 19:08, , 64F
12/29 19:08, 64F
推
12/29 19:24, , 65F
12/29 19:24, 65F
推
12/29 19:39, , 66F
12/29 19:39, 66F
推
12/29 20:06, , 67F
12/29 20:06, 67F
→
12/29 20:07, , 68F
12/29 20:07, 68F
→
12/29 20:09, , 69F
12/29 20:09, 69F
你說的太好了
推
12/29 20:24, , 70F
12/29 20:24, 70F
推
12/29 20:36, , 71F
12/29 20:36, 71F
我笑了
※ 編輯: fantasibear (223.142.194.138), 12/29/2016 20:40:55
討論串 (同標題文章)