[問卦] 重機族一直覺得肉包鐵的重機比較安全?消失
搞不懂為何重機粉一直強調機車比較安全
機車可以上國道的老美 明明機車死亡率就差不多是汽車的20幾倍以上
為何重機族老是有肉包鐵比較安全的錯覺呢?
2011-2015 每十萬輛汽車死亡人數約9-10人左右
每一億英里汽車死亡人數約0.8-0.9人左右
每十萬輛機車死亡人數約54-57人左右
每一億英里機車死亡人數約23-25人左右
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 1.164.211.28
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1494230034.A.3CA.html
→
05/08 15:54, , 1F
05/08 15:54, 1F
→
05/08 15:54, , 2F
05/08 15:54, 2F
→
05/08 15:54, , 3F
05/08 15:54, 3F
推
05/08 15:55, , 4F
05/08 15:55, 4F
推
05/08 15:55, , 5F
05/08 15:55, 5F
推
05/08 15:55, , 6F
05/08 15:55, 6F
→
05/08 15:56, , 7F
05/08 15:56, 7F
推
05/08 15:56, , 8F
05/08 15:56, 8F
速度越快越危險倒是真的 死亡率跟著升高 數據也是這樣顯示低
推
05/08 15:56, , 9F
05/08 15:56, 9F
噓
05/08 15:57, , 10F
05/08 15:57, 10F
你們的夥伴們
→
05/08 15:57, , 11F
05/08 15:57, 11F
→
05/08 15:58, , 12F
05/08 15:58, 12F
用命來換值得尊敬 立正敬禮
推
05/08 15:58, , 13F
05/08 15:58, 13F
推
05/08 15:59, , 14F
05/08 15:59, 14F
推
05/08 15:59, , 15F
05/08 15:59, 15F
→
05/08 15:59, , 16F
05/08 15:59, 16F
推
05/08 15:59, , 17F
05/08 15:59, 17F
→
05/08 15:59, , 18F
05/08 15:59, 18F
在美國好像正好相反 機車死亡以25-54這個年齡層佔大宗
→
05/08 16:00, , 19F
05/08 16:00, 19F
推
05/08 16:02, , 20F
05/08 16:02, 20F
→
05/08 16:03, , 21F
05/08 16:03, 21F
噓
05/08 16:05, , 22F
05/08 16:05, 22F
就說車子本身的安全性咩 這麼直觀的東西還是有人看不懂嗎?
那我也沒辦法了
推
05/08 16:06, , 23F
05/08 16:06, 23F
→
05/08 16:07, , 24F
05/08 16:07, 24F
推
05/08 16:09, , 25F
05/08 16:09, 25F
推
05/08 16:12, , 26F
05/08 16:12, 26F
推
05/08 16:15, , 27F
05/08 16:15, 27F
他們說 別怕 在國道上以我們的動力可以海放四輪 很安全低
噓
05/08 16:16, , 28F
05/08 16:16, 28F
推
05/08 16:17, , 29F
05/08 16:17, 29F
推
05/08 16:19, , 30F
05/08 16:19, 30F
推
05/08 16:19, , 31F
05/08 16:19, 31F
推
05/08 16:20, , 32F
05/08 16:20, 32F
噓
05/08 16:20, , 33F
05/08 16:20, 33F
還有 52 則推文
還有 20 段內文
→
05/08 16:53, , 86F
05/08 16:53, 86F
→
05/08 16:53, , 87F
05/08 16:53, 87F
兩位看一下你們引以為傲的美國
那機車死亡率是汽車的幾倍啊 我看了都好抖
這麼保障小車的國家都能死成這樣了 在台灣.....
※ 編輯: wmigrant (1.164.211.28), 05/08/2017 16:55:14
→
05/08 16:56, , 88F
05/08 16:56, 88F
→
05/08 16:56, , 89F
05/08 16:56, 89F
→
05/08 16:56, , 90F
05/08 16:56, 90F
推
05/08 16:57, , 91F
05/08 16:57, 91F
→
05/08 16:57, , 92F
05/08 16:57, 92F
噓
05/08 16:58, , 93F
05/08 16:58, 93F
→
05/08 16:59, , 94F
05/08 16:59, 94F
→
05/08 16:59, , 95F
05/08 16:59, 95F
推
05/08 16:59, , 96F
05/08 16:59, 96F
→
05/08 16:59, , 97F
05/08 16:59, 97F
→
05/08 16:59, , 98F
05/08 16:59, 98F
→
05/08 17:00, , 99F
05/08 17:00, 99F
推
05/08 17:02, , 100F
05/08 17:02, 100F
→
05/08 17:03, , 101F
05/08 17:03, 101F
→
05/08 17:04, , 102F
05/08 17:04, 102F
→
05/08 17:05, , 103F
05/08 17:05, 103F
→
05/08 17:07, , 104F
05/08 17:07, 104F
噓
05/08 17:13, , 105F
05/08 17:13, 105F
推
05/08 17:24, , 106F
05/08 17:24, 106F
→
05/08 17:25, , 107F
05/08 17:25, 107F
噓
05/08 17:30, , 108F
05/08 17:30, 108F
→
05/08 17:30, , 109F
05/08 17:30, 109F
→
05/08 17:34, , 110F
05/08 17:34, 110F
→
05/08 17:40, , 111F
05/08 17:40, 111F
→
05/08 17:40, , 112F
05/08 17:40, 112F
→
05/08 17:40, , 113F
05/08 17:40, 113F
→
05/08 17:43, , 114F
05/08 17:43, 114F
→
05/08 17:43, , 115F
05/08 17:43, 115F
→
05/08 17:43, , 116F
05/08 17:43, 116F
噓
05/08 18:33, , 117F
05/08 18:33, 117F
→
05/08 18:33, , 118F
05/08 18:33, 118F
噓
05/08 19:43, , 119F
05/08 19:43, 119F
噓
05/08 19:43, , 120F
05/08 19:43, 120F
→
05/08 20:04, , 121F
05/08 20:04, 121F
→
05/08 20:05, , 122F
05/08 20:05, 122F
噓
05/08 20:49, , 123F
05/08 20:49, 123F
推
05/08 23:16, , 124F
05/08 23:16, 124F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 5 篇):