[問卦] 韓國演藝公司為什麼敢吃台灣夠夠?消失
什麼都先放一邊,譬如這個叫賴冠什麼的...家裡面是不是早就佈局好移民中國
衝著他才15歲,就不跟這小屁孩計較,即使說出中國台灣,我還是不跟一個15歲的計較
但他所屬的 韓國Cube娛樂經紀公司 https://goo.gl/8F8QQg
必定得對它旗下藝人負全責,不管背後公司其實是主導、主動、強制、或被動
說出這番話後,其實你們公司藝人,要去中國發展就去吧,但為什麼說出這番話後
韓國公司還敢安排來台見面會?實在很難想像
如果台灣公司找了一個南韓人號稱北韓人,還有種帶著這個北韓人..去南韓辦見面會嗎?
韓國娛樂公司感覺...為什麼好像吃定台灣、吃台灣夠夠,唔咧驚欸啦!?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 210.209.183.125
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1504312370.A.7D8.html
→
09/02 08:33, , 1F
09/02 08:33, 1F
推
09/02 08:34, , 2F
09/02 08:34, 2F
推
09/02 08:34, , 3F
09/02 08:34, 3F
→
09/02 08:34, , 4F
09/02 08:34, 4F
→
09/02 08:34, , 5F
09/02 08:34, 5F
推
09/02 08:34, , 6F
09/02 08:34, 6F
→
09/02 08:35, , 7F
09/02 08:35, 7F
→
09/02 08:35, , 8F
09/02 08:35, 8F
推
09/02 08:35, , 9F
09/02 08:35, 9F
→
09/02 08:37, , 10F
09/02 08:37, 10F
推
09/02 08:37, , 11F
09/02 08:37, 11F
推
09/02 08:37, , 12F
09/02 08:37, 12F
推
09/02 08:38, , 13F
09/02 08:38, 13F
推
09/02 08:38, , 14F
09/02 08:38, 14F
推
09/02 08:40, , 15F
09/02 08:40, 15F
→
09/02 08:40, , 16F
09/02 08:40, 16F
我不是演唱會咖 也不是抗議咖 就不會去而已算很溫和吧 自己覺得我這樣就夠
推
09/02 08:40, , 17F
09/02 08:40, 17F
推
09/02 08:41, , 18F
09/02 08:41, 18F
推
09/02 08:43, , 19F
09/02 08:43, 19F
噓
09/02 08:43, , 20F
09/02 08:43, 20F
噓
09/02 08:43, , 21F
09/02 08:43, 21F
推
09/02 08:44, , 22F
09/02 08:44, 22F
推
09/02 08:45, , 23F
09/02 08:45, 23F
在我感覺,南韓甚至日本,就算是腦妹,遇到這種事,應該會有一股退票潮吧?!
不是針對人而是針對人上面的公司,台灣的腦妹...為什麼今天會變成這副德行?
推
09/02 08:46, , 24F
09/02 08:46, 24F
推
09/02 08:47, , 25F
09/02 08:47, 25F
推
09/02 08:48, , 26F
09/02 08:48, 26F
推
09/02 08:48, , 27F
09/02 08:48, 27F
噓
09/02 08:49, , 28F
09/02 08:49, 28F
推
09/02 08:50, , 29F
09/02 08:50, 29F
→
09/02 08:50, , 30F
09/02 08:50, 30F
推
09/02 08:50, , 31F
09/02 08:50, 31F
→
09/02 08:50, , 32F
09/02 08:50, 32F
→
09/02 08:50, , 33F
09/02 08:50, 33F
推
09/02 08:51, , 34F
09/02 08:51, 34F
噓
09/02 08:51, , 35F
09/02 08:51, 35F
噓
09/02 08:51, , 36F
09/02 08:51, 36F
→
09/02 08:51, , 37F
09/02 08:51, 37F
還有 44 則推文
還有 1 段內文
→
09/02 09:48, , 82F
09/02 09:48, 82F
→
09/02 09:48, , 83F
09/02 09:48, 83F
→
09/02 09:50, , 84F
09/02 09:50, 84F
→
09/02 09:51, , 85F
09/02 09:51, 85F
→
09/02 09:52, , 86F
09/02 09:52, 86F
→
09/02 09:53, , 87F
09/02 09:53, 87F
→
09/02 09:54, , 88F
09/02 09:54, 88F
推
09/02 09:55, , 89F
09/02 09:55, 89F
推
09/02 10:00, , 90F
09/02 10:00, 90F
→
09/02 10:00, , 91F
09/02 10:00, 91F
推
09/02 10:08, , 92F
09/02 10:08, 92F
→
09/02 10:08, , 93F
09/02 10:08, 93F
→
09/02 10:13, , 94F
09/02 10:13, 94F
→
09/02 10:13, , 95F
09/02 10:13, 95F
→
09/02 10:15, , 96F
09/02 10:15, 96F
→
09/02 10:16, , 97F
09/02 10:16, 97F
→
09/02 10:17, , 98F
09/02 10:17, 98F
推
09/02 10:17, , 99F
09/02 10:17, 99F
推
09/02 10:32, , 100F
09/02 10:32, 100F
→
09/02 10:32, , 101F
09/02 10:32, 101F
推
09/02 10:36, , 102F
09/02 10:36, 102F
→
09/02 10:43, , 103F
09/02 10:43, 103F
噓
09/02 11:01, , 104F
09/02 11:01, 104F
→
09/02 11:02, , 105F
09/02 11:02, 105F
推
09/02 11:07, , 106F
09/02 11:07, 106F
推
09/02 11:10, , 107F
09/02 11:10, 107F
推
09/02 11:26, , 108F
09/02 11:26, 108F
推
09/02 12:23, , 109F
09/02 12:23, 109F
推
09/02 12:28, , 110F
09/02 12:28, 110F
→
09/02 12:28, , 111F
09/02 12:28, 111F
推
09/02 13:35, , 112F
09/02 13:35, 112F
推
09/02 14:13, , 113F
09/02 14:13, 113F
→
09/02 14:13, , 114F
09/02 14:13, 114F
噓
09/02 14:18, , 115F
09/02 14:18, 115F
推
09/02 15:19, , 116F
09/02 15:19, 116F
推
09/02 16:57, , 117F
09/02 16:57, 117F
推
09/02 16:59, , 118F
09/02 16:59, 118F
推
09/02 17:51, , 119F
09/02 17:51, 119F
→
09/02 18:18, , 120F
09/02 18:18, 120F
推
09/03 07:05, , 121F
09/03 07:05, 121F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 3 篇):