Re: [問卦] WIN10內建輸入法是不是反人類?消失
有人說win+space可以取代原本的ctrl+space
非常不認同
原本的ctrl+space可以讓你在 前一次中文輸入法<->英文 間互相切換
但win+space是把所有輸入法 包括其他語言的輸入法循環切換
要類比的話比較像原本的ctrl+shift
我有兩個中文輸入法 一個日文輸入法 一個Eng
每次都要在四個之間切來切去 智障死了
shift又是另個問題了
早在98時代我就發生過shift+字母 vs 單獨shift判斷混淆的問題
(要輸入全形標點符號必須用現在的shift切換中英)
所以win10設定裡面可以把shift功能關掉我覺得很好
但shift關掉 你就不要給我出現新注音的英文模式啊
就是會莫名其妙跑出來
win10乖乖的把ctrl+space快速切換中英放回來是會死人嗎?
另外還有日文輸入法和注音輸入法互相干擾的問題 這裡就不想多講了
簡而言之 爛透了 自以為能兼顧平板和PC結果就是不倫不類
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 211.72.117.63
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1510302890.A.69C.html
→
11/10 16:35, , 1F
11/10 16:35, 1F
推
11/10 16:36, , 2F
11/10 16:36, 2F
推
11/10 16:37, , 3F
11/10 16:37, 3F
推
11/10 16:37, , 4F
11/10 16:37, 4F
→
11/10 16:37, , 5F
11/10 16:37, 5F
→
11/10 16:37, , 6F
11/10 16:37, 6F
推
11/10 16:37, , 7F
11/10 16:37, 7F
推
11/10 16:38, , 8F
11/10 16:38, 8F
推
11/10 16:39, , 9F
11/10 16:39, 9F
推
11/10 16:41, , 10F
11/10 16:41, 10F
噓
11/10 16:41, , 11F
11/10 16:41, 11F
推
11/10 16:41, , 12F
11/10 16:41, 12F
推
11/10 16:42, , 13F
11/10 16:42, 13F
→
11/10 16:42, , 14F
11/10 16:42, 14F
→
11/10 16:44, , 15F
11/10 16:44, 15F
推
11/10 16:45, , 16F
11/10 16:45, 16F
→
11/10 16:46, , 17F
11/10 16:46, 17F
→
11/10 16:47, , 18F
11/10 16:47, 18F
推
11/10 16:48, , 19F
11/10 16:48, 19F
→
11/10 16:48, , 20F
11/10 16:48, 20F
→
11/10 16:49, , 21F
11/10 16:49, 21F
→
11/10 16:49, , 22F
11/10 16:49, 22F
→
11/10 16:59, , 23F
11/10 16:59, 23F
推
11/10 17:04, , 24F
11/10 17:04, 24F
→
11/10 17:04, , 25F
11/10 17:04, 25F
推
11/10 17:05, , 26F
11/10 17:05, 26F
推
11/10 17:08, , 27F
11/10 17:08, 27F
→
11/10 17:08, , 28F
11/10 17:08, 28F
→
11/10 17:09, , 29F
11/10 17:09, 29F
推
11/10 17:12, , 30F
11/10 17:12, 30F
推
11/10 17:14, , 31F
11/10 17:14, 31F
→
11/10 17:20, , 32F
11/10 17:20, 32F
→
11/10 17:21, , 33F
11/10 17:21, 33F
→
11/10 17:21, , 34F
11/10 17:21, 34F
推
11/10 17:21, , 35F
11/10 17:21, 35F
→
11/10 17:21, , 36F
11/10 17:21, 36F
→
11/10 17:26, , 37F
11/10 17:26, 37F
→
11/10 17:27, , 38F
11/10 17:27, 38F
推
11/10 17:27, , 39F
11/10 17:27, 39F
→
11/10 17:27, , 40F
11/10 17:27, 40F
→
11/10 17:29, , 41F
11/10 17:29, 41F
→
11/10 17:30, , 42F
11/10 17:30, 42F
推
11/10 17:31, , 43F
11/10 17:31, 43F
→
11/10 17:32, , 44F
11/10 17:32, 44F
推
11/10 17:34, , 45F
11/10 17:34, 45F
推
11/10 17:35, , 46F
11/10 17:35, 46F
推
11/10 17:39, , 47F
11/10 17:39, 47F
→
11/10 17:39, , 48F
11/10 17:39, 48F
推
11/10 17:48, , 49F
11/10 17:48, 49F
推
11/10 18:13, , 50F
11/10 18:13, 50F
推
11/10 18:29, , 51F
11/10 18:29, 51F
推
11/10 18:34, , 52F
11/10 18:34, 52F
→
11/10 18:40, , 53F
11/10 18:40, 53F
推
11/10 18:59, , 54F
11/10 18:59, 54F
→
11/10 19:20, , 55F
11/10 19:20, 55F
推
11/10 19:28, , 56F
11/10 19:28, 56F
推
11/10 21:08, , 57F
11/10 21:08, 57F
推
11/10 21:34, , 58F
11/10 21:34, 58F
推
11/10 22:07, , 59F
11/10 22:07, 59F
推
11/10 22:45, , 60F
11/10 22:45, 60F
→
11/10 22:45, , 61F
11/10 22:45, 61F
推
11/11 00:04, , 62F
11/11 00:04, 62F
→
11/11 02:40, , 63F
11/11 02:40, 63F
→
11/11 08:22, , 64F
11/11 08:22, 64F
→
11/11 08:23, , 65F
11/11 08:23, 65F
→
11/11 08:26, , 66F
11/11 08:26, 66F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 5 篇):