Re: [新聞] 高雄》韓國瑜:民進黨不求進步 只求把國民黨打趴消失
※ 引述《gasiacruise (bryant)》之銘言:
: 現在只要有韓國瑜的新聞
: 最好笑的是
: 前幾樓都是有被抓過開分身
: 自言自語來噓的黨工
: 高雄是真的很怕輸韓吧
: 別再自己開分身帶風向了啦
: dpp到底是養多少黨工
: 天天躲在八卦版
: 啊高雄不是躺著選
: 怎麼現在舉全黨之力在打韓
: 要打韓 麻煩說一些有論據的話
: 不要像小學生一樣只會說 什麼你怎樣你怎樣的
: 真的令人笑死
: DPP肯定怕韓上了把高雄二十年的負債 貪污 官商勾結
: 全部抖出來
(原文刪除)
八月底因為公事去高雄半個月(也就是南部大雨那陣子)
這是我第二次在高雄
第一次去高雄是我國一幫我家人緊急送東西而搭飛機的時候
兩次距離21年
老實說舊高雄市區給我的感覺真的沒有甚麼變化
甚至我在想這20年來高雄到底進步在哪裡?
因為台北的20年前跟後絕對是兩模樣
甚至是花蓮20年前後也都明顯不同....
但高雄就真的給我絲毫沒有進步的感覺
或這是對我這非高雄人來說
除了謝長廷時代感覺真的讓高雄有點聲色跟亮點外
之後我就對高雄沒有印象了
所以韓國瑜說高雄又怎樣又怎樣的~我這個外地人完全同意
至於高雄人是否這樣想就不知道了
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 203.72.64.121
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1536211089.A.F31.html
→
09/06 13:19, , 1F
09/06 13:19, 1F
推
09/06 13:20, , 2F
09/06 13:20, 2F
推
09/06 13:20, , 3F
09/06 13:20, 3F
→
09/06 13:21, , 4F
09/06 13:21, 4F
推
09/06 13:21, , 5F
09/06 13:21, 5F
噓
09/06 13:22, , 6F
09/06 13:22, 6F
推
09/06 13:22, , 7F
09/06 13:22, 7F
→
09/06 13:22, , 8F
09/06 13:22, 8F
→
09/06 13:22, , 9F
09/06 13:22, 9F
推
09/06 13:22, , 10F
09/06 13:22, 10F
→
09/06 13:22, , 11F
09/06 13:22, 11F
推
09/06 13:23, , 12F
09/06 13:23, 12F
→
09/06 13:23, , 13F
09/06 13:23, 13F
推
09/06 13:24, , 14F
09/06 13:24, 14F
→
09/06 13:24, , 15F
09/06 13:24, 15F
推
09/06 13:24, , 16F
09/06 13:24, 16F
→
09/06 13:25, , 17F
09/06 13:25, 17F
推
09/06 13:25, , 18F
09/06 13:25, 18F
→
09/06 13:25, , 19F
09/06 13:25, 19F
→
09/06 13:25, , 20F
09/06 13:25, 20F
→
09/06 13:26, , 21F
09/06 13:26, 21F
推
09/06 13:26, , 22F
09/06 13:26, 22F
→
09/06 13:26, , 23F
09/06 13:26, 23F
→
09/06 13:27, , 24F
09/06 13:27, 24F
→
09/06 13:27, , 25F
09/06 13:27, 25F
推
09/06 13:27, , 26F
09/06 13:27, 26F
推
09/06 13:28, , 27F
09/06 13:28, 27F
推
09/06 13:28, , 28F
09/06 13:28, 28F
推
09/06 13:29, , 29F
09/06 13:29, 29F
推
09/06 13:29, , 30F
09/06 13:29, 30F
噓
09/06 13:32, , 31F
09/06 13:32, 31F
→
09/06 13:32, , 32F
09/06 13:32, 32F
推
09/06 13:33, , 33F
09/06 13:33, 33F
→
09/06 13:33, , 34F
09/06 13:33, 34F
推
09/06 13:34, , 35F
09/06 13:34, 35F
→
09/06 13:34, , 36F
09/06 13:34, 36F
→
09/06 13:35, , 37F
09/06 13:35, 37F
→
09/06 13:35, , 38F
09/06 13:35, 38F
→
09/06 13:36, , 39F
09/06 13:36, 39F
還有 37 則推文
推
09/06 13:48, , 77F
09/06 13:48, 77F
→
09/06 13:48, , 78F
09/06 13:48, 78F
→
09/06 13:52, , 79F
09/06 13:52, 79F
噓
09/06 13:57, , 80F
09/06 13:57, 80F
→
09/06 13:59, , 81F
09/06 13:59, 81F
→
09/06 13:59, , 82F
09/06 13:59, 82F
→
09/06 13:59, , 83F
09/06 13:59, 83F
推
09/06 14:00, , 84F
09/06 14:00, 84F
噓
09/06 14:00, , 85F
09/06 14:00, 85F
→
09/06 14:00, , 86F
09/06 14:00, 86F
推
09/06 14:11, , 87F
09/06 14:11, 87F
推
09/06 14:18, , 88F
09/06 14:18, 88F
推
09/06 14:20, , 89F
09/06 14:20, 89F
推
09/06 14:22, , 90F
09/06 14:22, 90F
推
09/06 14:32, , 91F
09/06 14:32, 91F
推
09/06 14:32, , 92F
09/06 14:32, 92F
噓
09/06 14:43, , 93F
09/06 14:43, 93F
噓
09/06 14:49, , 94F
09/06 14:49, 94F
推
09/06 14:53, , 95F
09/06 14:53, 95F
→
09/06 15:20, , 96F
09/06 15:20, 96F
→
09/06 15:27, , 97F
09/06 15:27, 97F
→
09/06 15:27, , 98F
09/06 15:27, 98F
噓
09/06 15:31, , 99F
09/06 15:31, 99F
→
09/06 15:49, , 100F
09/06 15:49, 100F
推
09/06 16:06, , 101F
09/06 16:06, 101F
→
09/06 16:06, , 102F
09/06 16:06, 102F
推
09/06 16:12, , 103F
09/06 16:12, 103F
→
09/06 16:12, , 104F
09/06 16:12, 104F
噓
09/06 16:18, , 105F
09/06 16:18, 105F
推
09/06 16:19, , 106F
09/06 16:19, 106F
→
09/06 16:19, , 107F
09/06 16:19, 107F
→
09/06 17:14, , 108F
09/06 17:14, 108F
推
09/06 17:32, , 109F
09/06 17:32, 109F
推
09/06 17:59, , 110F
09/06 17:59, 110F
噓
09/06 18:03, , 111F
09/06 18:03, 111F
噓
09/06 18:47, , 112F
09/06 18:47, 112F
噓
09/06 18:53, , 113F
09/06 18:53, 113F
→
09/06 22:16, , 114F
09/06 22:16, 114F
→
09/06 23:15, , 115F
09/06 23:15, 115F
噓
09/06 23:59, , 116F
09/06 23:59, 116F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 9 之 12 篇):