[討論] 文大宿舍案會變成軍宅案或興票案的翻版嗎消失
今天有看到年代在討論文大宿舍案 看起來案情不單純
可能對侯友宜殺傷力最大的不是民進黨的議員
而是國民黨內部自己的對手 如金介壽等
究竟有沒有違法 可能還有待司法調查
不過前幾天有新北市政府去"關說"
就讓這件事更大條了 可能短期內不會善了
此案如果繼續發展下去 會不會變成軍宅案的翻版?
或者甚至是興票案的翻版 讓整個選情大翻盤呢?
或許最後終究會以合法來結案
但侯友宜原本的清廉 鐵漢形象可能會大受影響
甚至說不定會有人把他打成"OO探長"(電影演過的)
至於國民黨這時可能陷入兩難 如果由侯硬撐下去
年底結果會如何還不知道 就算真的換上周老虎救援
也不見得就能選贏 因為周的民調和蘇貞昌是差不多的
更何況若換人 中間肯定會有原支持者的反彈
前年的換柱案就是很好的例子
再者以民進黨如今掌有國家資源 要再找出周錫瑋的弊端
肯定也是不難的 所以周錫瑋也不要期待自己真能替補上陣打贏選戰
反觀蘇貞昌 雖然民調落後 但落後幅度並不算大
且他目前已經可說是無案可打 因為能打得早就打過了
目前距離投票日還有五個多月 未來可能還有很多變數出現
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 118.166.114.203
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/HatePolitics/M.1529415394.A.CB3.html
→
06/19 21:38, , 1F
06/19 21:38, 1F
→
06/19 21:38, , 2F
06/19 21:38, 2F
→
06/19 21:39, , 3F
06/19 21:39, 3F
→
06/19 21:43, , 4F
06/19 21:43, 4F
推
06/19 21:45, , 5F
06/19 21:45, 5F
→
06/19 21:45, , 6F
06/19 21:45, 6F
→
06/19 21:45, , 7F
06/19 21:45, 7F
→
06/19 21:45, , 8F
06/19 21:45, 8F
推
06/19 21:45, , 9F
06/19 21:45, 9F
→
06/19 21:46, , 10F
06/19 21:46, 10F
→
06/19 21:46, , 11F
06/19 21:46, 11F
→
06/19 21:46, , 12F
06/19 21:46, 12F
→
06/19 21:47, , 13F
06/19 21:47, 13F
→
06/19 21:47, , 14F
06/19 21:47, 14F
→
06/19 21:48, , 15F
06/19 21:48, 15F
→
06/19 21:48, , 16F
06/19 21:48, 16F
→
06/19 21:49, , 17F
06/19 21:49, 17F
推
06/19 21:50, , 18F
06/19 21:50, 18F
→
06/19 21:52, , 19F
06/19 21:52, 19F
→
06/19 21:53, , 20F
06/19 21:53, 20F
推
06/19 21:54, , 21F
06/19 21:54, 21F
推
06/19 21:55, , 22F
06/19 21:55, 22F
→
06/19 21:56, , 23F
06/19 21:56, 23F
→
06/19 21:56, , 24F
06/19 21:56, 24F
→
06/19 21:56, , 25F
06/19 21:56, 25F
→
06/19 21:56, , 26F
06/19 21:56, 26F
→
06/19 21:56, , 27F
06/19 21:56, 27F
→
06/19 21:57, , 28F
06/19 21:57, 28F
→
06/19 21:57, , 29F
06/19 21:57, 29F
→
06/19 21:58, , 30F
06/19 21:58, 30F
→
06/19 21:58, , 31F
06/19 21:58, 31F
→
06/19 21:58, , 32F
06/19 21:58, 32F
推
06/19 21:58, , 33F
06/19 21:58, 33F
→
06/19 21:58, , 34F
06/19 21:58, 34F
→
06/19 21:59, , 35F
06/19 21:59, 35F
→
06/19 21:59, , 36F
06/19 21:59, 36F
→
06/19 21:59, , 37F
06/19 21:59, 37F
→
06/19 21:59, , 38F
06/19 21:59, 38F
→
06/19 22:00, , 39F
06/19 22:00, 39F
還有 57 則推文
推
06/19 22:17, , 97F
06/19 22:17, 97F
→
06/19 22:17, , 98F
06/19 22:17, 98F
→
06/19 22:17, , 99F
06/19 22:17, 99F
推
06/19 22:18, , 100F
06/19 22:18, 100F
推
06/19 22:19, , 101F
06/19 22:19, 101F
→
06/19 22:19, , 102F
06/19 22:19, 102F
→
06/19 22:19, , 103F
06/19 22:19, 103F
→
06/19 22:19, , 104F
06/19 22:19, 104F
推
06/19 22:20, , 105F
06/19 22:20, 105F
→
06/19 22:21, , 106F
06/19 22:21, 106F
→
06/19 22:22, , 107F
06/19 22:22, 107F
推
06/19 22:22, , 108F
06/19 22:22, 108F
→
06/19 22:22, , 109F
06/19 22:22, 109F
→
06/19 22:22, , 110F
06/19 22:22, 110F
→
06/19 22:22, , 111F
06/19 22:22, 111F
→
06/19 22:22, , 112F
06/19 22:22, 112F
→
06/19 22:23, , 113F
06/19 22:23, 113F
→
06/19 22:24, , 114F
06/19 22:24, 114F
→
06/19 22:24, , 115F
06/19 22:24, 115F
→
06/19 22:24, , 116F
06/19 22:24, 116F
推
06/19 22:24, , 117F
06/19 22:24, 117F
推
06/19 22:24, , 118F
06/19 22:24, 118F
→
06/19 22:25, , 119F
06/19 22:25, 119F
→
06/19 22:25, , 120F
06/19 22:25, 120F
→
06/19 22:25, , 121F
06/19 22:25, 121F
→
06/19 22:26, , 122F
06/19 22:26, 122F
推
06/19 22:28, , 123F
06/19 22:28, 123F
推
06/19 22:35, , 124F
06/19 22:35, 124F
→
06/19 22:35, , 125F
06/19 22:35, 125F
推
06/19 22:48, , 126F
06/19 22:48, 126F
→
06/19 22:48, , 127F
06/19 22:48, 127F
→
06/19 22:51, , 128F
06/19 22:51, 128F
推
06/19 22:51, , 129F
06/19 22:51, 129F
→
06/19 22:56, , 130F
06/19 22:56, 130F
推
06/19 22:57, , 131F
06/19 22:57, 131F
推
06/19 23:02, , 132F
06/19 23:02, 132F
→
06/19 23:06, , 133F
06/19 23:06, 133F
推
06/21 15:54, , 134F
06/21 15:54, 134F
→
06/21 15:54, , 135F
06/21 15:54, 135F
→
06/21 15:54, , 136F
06/21 15:54, 136F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 15 篇):