Re: [討教] 虛竹跟蕭峰,哪個強?
※ 引述《sscck5 (oraora)》之銘言:
: 雖然問這種問題沒甚麼意義
: 但還是忍不住想問
: 虛竹身負百年功力以及逍遙派多項絕學
: 蕭峰身為契丹人的驕傲更是能發出前無古人後無來者的隔空降龍掌 擒龍功等
: 段譽還要吸別人功力才能射出來
: 蕭峰直接就打出來
: 如果兩人不顧一切地對對方下殺手,誰會贏呢?
: -----
: Sent from JPTT on my HUAWEI G700-U10.
虛竹啊!
他是真的強
跟段譽這時靈時不靈只有內功震古鑠今的半調子不同
沒認真打時鳩摩智都被打的綁手綁腳
天龍裡頭蕭遠山 慕容博 鳩摩智 蕭峰四隻是貨真價實的武學奇才
姑且不論前二位六十路老人
四十路的鳩摩智ㄧ人挑天龍六隻保定帝以上等級
三十路的蕭峰ㄧ人開殺爆聚賢莊戰丁春秋慕容復游坦之
尋常人要練到這四位武功那是千難萬難 今生無望
逍遙三老恐怕無法想像有這四位「後生小輩」可把武功練到這地步
但融合三老功力的虛竹 身負逍遙派兩百餘年內力
生死符
天山六陽掌
天山折梅手
降龍十八掌等高階武學
武功之高正如金庸所說已到了隨心所遇無往不利的境界
單用黑虎偷心 鳩摩智這在小說中未嚐一敗的都無法拿下
我想問的是
兩百年功力的虛竹
認真使出
亢龍有悔
掃地僧氣牆擋得住嗎?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 223.140.26.33
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/JinYong/M.1423480346.A.4EC.html
※ 編輯: meianhua (223.140.26.33), 02/09/2015 19:26:36
→ carrothead: 虛竹某種程度也算苦戰吧,他實力要比鳩摩智和丁春秋
02/09 19:16
→
02/09 19:16, , 1F
02/09 19:16, 1F
推
02/09 19:27, , 2F
02/09 19:27, 2F
推
02/09 19:29, , 3F
02/09 19:29, 3F
看王語嫣有沒有認真教學吧
把段譽教成南帝的武技
以段譽內力運行六脈的確連虛竹都攻不進
※ 編輯: meianhua (223.140.26.33), 02/09/2015 19:39:26
→
02/09 19:45, , 4F
02/09 19:45, 4F
→
02/09 19:46, , 5F
02/09 19:46, 5F
→
02/09 19:56, , 6F
02/09 19:56, 6F
推
02/09 20:10, , 7F
02/09 20:10, 7F
→
02/09 20:17, , 8F
02/09 20:17, 8F
→
02/09 20:38, , 9F
02/09 20:38, 9F
→
02/09 20:41, , 10F
02/09 20:41, 10F
→
02/09 20:41, , 11F
02/09 20:41, 11F
→
02/09 20:46, , 12F
02/09 20:46, 12F
推
02/09 21:01, , 13F
02/09 21:01, 13F
→
02/09 21:02, , 14F
02/09 21:02, 14F
→
02/09 21:03, , 15F
02/09 21:03, 15F
→
02/09 21:03, , 16F
02/09 21:03, 16F
→
02/09 21:03, , 17F
02/09 21:03, 17F
→
02/09 21:03, , 18F
02/09 21:03, 18F
→
02/09 21:04, , 19F
02/09 21:04, 19F
→
02/09 21:04, , 20F
02/09 21:04, 20F
→
02/09 21:05, , 21F
02/09 21:05, 21F
→
02/09 21:06, , 22F
02/09 21:06, 22F
→
02/09 21:06, , 23F
02/09 21:06, 23F
→
02/09 21:08, , 24F
02/09 21:08, 24F
→
02/09 21:09, , 25F
02/09 21:09, 25F
→
02/09 21:09, , 26F
02/09 21:09, 26F
→
02/09 21:09, , 27F
02/09 21:09, 27F
→
02/09 21:09, , 28F
02/09 21:09, 28F
→
02/09 21:10, , 29F
02/09 21:10, 29F
→
02/09 21:10, , 30F
02/09 21:10, 30F
→
02/09 21:11, , 31F
02/09 21:11, 31F
→
02/09 21:11, , 32F
02/09 21:11, 32F
→
02/09 21:12, , 33F
02/09 21:12, 33F
→
02/09 21:14, , 34F
02/09 21:14, 34F
→
02/09 21:14, , 35F
02/09 21:14, 35F
→
02/09 21:14, , 36F
02/09 21:14, 36F
→
02/09 21:14, , 37F
02/09 21:14, 37F
→
02/09 21:15, , 38F
02/09 21:15, 38F
→
02/09 21:16, , 39F
02/09 21:16, 39F
→
02/09 21:16, , 40F
02/09 21:16, 40F
→
02/09 21:19, , 41F
02/09 21:19, 41F
→
02/09 21:21, , 42F
02/09 21:21, 42F
→
02/09 21:21, , 43F
02/09 21:21, 43F
→
02/09 21:23, , 44F
02/09 21:23, 44F
→
02/09 21:24, , 45F
02/09 21:24, 45F
→
02/09 21:25, , 46F
02/09 21:25, 46F
→
02/09 21:26, , 47F
02/09 21:26, 47F
→
02/09 21:26, , 48F
02/09 21:26, 48F
→
02/09 21:31, , 49F
02/09 21:31, 49F
→
02/09 21:32, , 50F
02/09 21:32, 50F
→
02/09 21:34, , 51F
02/09 21:34, 51F
→
02/09 21:35, , 52F
02/09 21:35, 52F
噓
02/14 07:21, , 53F
02/14 07:21, 53F
→
02/14 07:23, , 54F
02/14 07:23, 54F
→
02/14 07:23, , 55F
02/14 07:23, 55F
→
02/14 07:25, , 56F
02/14 07:25, 56F
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
討教
50
175
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 11 篇):
討教
50
175
討教
17
35
討教
33
260
討教
22
161
討教
14
103
討教
34
243