Re: [討論] 如果只是為了奪冠而與金塊進行交易
看板Lakers作者LAKERsBryant (Take a break ,ok?)時間13年前 (2011/02/09 22:41)推噓18(24推 6噓 40→)留言70則, 30人參與討論串2/3 (看更多)
想動Bynum? 可以 拿槍西+MELO+C(堪用即可)來換
少了BYNUM 多了槍西+MELO
湖人先發陣容基本上變動不大
先發 替補
1號 Billups 1~2 Shannon
2~3 Kobe 1~2 Fisher or Blake
2~3 Anthony 2~3 MB or Artest
3~4 Odom
4~5 Gasol 4~5 堪用肉柱即可
基本上 就這樣九人輪替 我覺得就可行了
老魚 或 BLAKE 選一隻留下
MB 或 ARTEST 選一隻留下
所以目前我們能端出去的菜 硬是要賣BYNUM的話 還可以搭
老魚 or Blake + MB or RONRON
我個人選的話
BYNUM + BLAKE + MB + 其他配菜
這樣或許有機會弄到 槍西+ANTHONY吧 ...
可是 老話一句
除非有裸照.... 不然...這個陣容看起來真的還不錯...不要少任何一隻的話
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 111.249.45.253
推
02/09 22:43, , 1F
02/09 22:43, 1F
槍西好像是千萬出頭吧?? 有機會對等...BLAKE+FISHER+BYNUM
好像就可以薪資差不多對等了(再加一點配菜)...可是應該還是不可能
→
02/09 22:44, , 2F
02/09 22:44, 2F
推
02/09 22:45, , 3F
02/09 22:45, 3F
→
02/09 22:45, , 4F
02/09 22:45, 4F
→
02/09 22:46, , 5F
02/09 22:46, 5F
推
02/09 22:46, , 6F
02/09 22:46, 6F
推
02/09 22:46, , 7F
02/09 22:46, 7F
我覺得遇到超賽 沒有一對的內線競爭力是夠的...所以要想辦法搞到一隻堪用即可的肉柱
其他就靠那星光閃耀的 得分機器吧
話說 ANTHONY來LA接班...是我的夢想XDDD
推
02/09 22:47, , 8F
02/09 22:47, 8F
→
02/09 22:47, , 9F
02/09 22:47, 9F
推
02/09 22:48, , 10F
02/09 22:48, 10F
推
02/09 22:50, , 11F
02/09 22:50, 11F
現在金塊不換 明年不是聽說會剩空氣嗎?? 科
推
02/09 22:51, , 12F
02/09 22:51, 12F
噓
02/09 22:52, , 13F
02/09 22:52, 13F
→
02/09 22:53, , 14F
02/09 22:53, 14F
→
02/09 22:54, , 15F
02/09 22:54, 15F
推
02/09 22:54, , 16F
02/09 22:54, 16F
噓
02/09 22:59, , 17F
02/09 22:59, 17F
噓
02/09 22:59, , 18F
02/09 22:59, 18F
想要BYNUM當主菜當然要配點小菜啊...不然BYNUM 換 MELO 一換一 感覺我們比較吃虧
BYNUM (C) MB (SF) BLAKE (PG) .... 配菜(?)
1.3.5號啊....要說洞頂多BLAKE是洞吧 MB & BYNUM 都OK啊
是說...當初說要用那些配菜換GASOL誰相信...
推
02/09 23:01, , 19F
02/09 23:01, 19F
→
02/09 23:01, , 20F
02/09 23:01, 20F
→
02/09 23:01, , 21F
02/09 23:01, 21F
看怎麼操作 可是不可否認 可能性會提高一咪咪 畢竟空氣跟BYNUM比起來
BYNUM至少份量比空氣重一點 BILLUPS也已經開始老了 要把Anthony送走
那幾乎是等於金塊要開始重建了...
→
02/09 23:01, , 22F
02/09 23:01, 22F
→
02/09 23:01, , 23F
02/09 23:01, 23F
金塊的鋒線 已經不錯了 還要再補Chandler 感覺堆太多4號
※ 編輯: LAKERsBryant 來自: 111.249.45.253 (02/09 23:08)
推
02/09 23:05, , 24F
02/09 23:05, 24F
→
02/09 23:05, , 25F
02/09 23:05, 25F
噓
02/09 23:05, , 26F
02/09 23:05, 26F
噓
02/09 23:07, , 27F
02/09 23:07, 27F
→
02/09 23:07, , 28F
02/09 23:07, 28F
→
02/09 23:12, , 29F
02/09 23:12, 29F
→
02/09 23:15, , 30F
02/09 23:15, 30F
推
02/09 23:17, , 31F
02/09 23:17, 31F
→
02/09 23:18, , 32F
02/09 23:18, 32F
→
02/09 23:18, , 33F
02/09 23:18, 33F
→
02/09 23:18, , 34F
02/09 23:18, 34F
→
02/09 23:18, , 35F
02/09 23:18, 35F
→
02/09 23:18, , 36F
02/09 23:18, 36F
→
02/09 23:19, , 37F
02/09 23:19, 37F
→
02/09 23:19, , 38F
02/09 23:19, 38F
推
02/09 23:20, , 39F
02/09 23:20, 39F
→
02/09 23:22, , 40F
02/09 23:22, 40F
→
02/09 23:23, , 41F
02/09 23:23, 41F
推
02/09 23:23, , 42F
02/09 23:23, 42F
推
02/09 23:23, , 43F
02/09 23:23, 43F
→
02/09 23:24, , 44F
02/09 23:24, 44F
→
02/09 23:24, , 45F
02/09 23:24, 45F
推
02/09 23:25, , 46F
02/09 23:25, 46F
推
02/09 23:25, , 47F
02/09 23:25, 47F
推
02/09 23:26, , 48F
02/09 23:26, 48F
→
02/09 23:26, , 49F
02/09 23:26, 49F
→
02/09 23:27, , 50F
02/09 23:27, 50F
推
02/09 23:27, , 51F
02/09 23:27, 51F
推
02/09 23:27, , 52F
02/09 23:27, 52F
→
02/09 23:27, , 53F
02/09 23:27, 53F
→
02/09 23:28, , 54F
02/09 23:28, 54F
→
02/09 23:28, , 55F
02/09 23:28, 55F
→
02/09 23:28, , 56F
02/09 23:28, 56F
→
02/09 23:29, , 57F
02/09 23:29, 57F
推
02/09 23:29, , 58F
02/09 23:29, 58F
→
02/09 23:30, , 59F
02/09 23:30, 59F
→
02/09 23:30, , 60F
02/09 23:30, 60F
推
02/09 23:31, , 61F
02/09 23:31, 61F
推
02/09 23:33, , 62F
02/09 23:33, 62F
→
02/10 03:03, , 63F
02/10 03:03, 63F
推
02/10 10:27, , 64F
02/10 10:27, 64F
噓
02/10 10:38, , 65F
02/10 10:38, 65F
→
02/10 11:54, , 66F
02/10 11:54, 66F
→
08/08 13:19, , 67F
08/08 13:19, 67F
→
09/11 02:30, , 68F
09/11 02:30, 68F
→
09/11 05:06, , 69F
09/11 05:06, 69F
→
12/11 19:57,
5年前
, 70F
12/11 19:57, 70F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 3 篇):