Re: [閒聊] 為什麼卡特這麼容易被BAN?消失
從低端到高端,卡特勝率都是常駐前段班,
本質上就是OP角啦,沒啥好說的。
無消耗、洗兵快、Q遠距離、E可落跑,
綜合以上這些要素,線上就是很難壓爛,
而且就算線上壓爛,你知我知,
一個會戰給他滾鍵盤收到頭,這場就差不多走遠了。
不要跟我說啥卡特怕CC,大家針對他,
會戰小心不要殘血給他收就好,
一隊有5個人,只要一個人腦包,殘血讓他收到,
剩下4個人就等著被拖下水了,
打solo是要怎麼保證,4個隊友都沒人犯二呢?
說到底,會質疑卡特不該ban的,大概只有兩種人:
一是你沒玩過卡特,不知道他多狗;
二是你卡特玩太爛,OP腳在你手上也能變垃圾。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 199.188.236.150
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/LoL/M.1424683949.A.375.html
噓
02/23 17:39, , 1F
02/23 17:39, 1F
→
02/23 17:39, , 2F
02/23 17:39, 2F
推
02/23 17:40, , 3F
02/23 17:40, 3F
卡特只要吃到經驗有等級,會戰就夠強了,
你一直推兵只是對線輕鬆,沒意義啊。
推
02/23 17:46, , 4F
02/23 17:46, 4F
→
02/23 17:46, , 5F
02/23 17:46, 5F
噓
02/23 17:46, , 6F
02/23 17:46, 6F
不要在那邊斷章取義,先把中文學好再來噓.....
線上就是很難「壓爛」,跟很難「壓」完全是兩回事。
你吃兵贏個5隻也叫壓啊,但這叫壓爛嗎?
起碼要讓他沒經濟沒等級,會戰只能打醬油,才叫「壓爛」吧?
你覺得很簡單,那怎麼低端到高端,卡特勝率都這麼高?
※ 編輯: polymaker (173.245.67.32), 02/23/2015 17:51:16
推
02/23 17:46, , 7F
02/23 17:46, 7F
推
02/23 17:48, , 8F
02/23 17:48, 8F
噓
02/23 17:52, , 9F
02/23 17:52, 9F
推
02/23 17:52, , 10F
02/23 17:52, 10F
推
02/23 17:54, , 11F
02/23 17:54, 11F
推
02/23 17:55, , 12F
02/23 17:55, 12F
→
02/23 17:56, , 13F
02/23 17:56, 13F
推
02/23 17:58, , 14F
02/23 17:58, 14F
推
02/23 18:00, , 15F
02/23 18:00, 15F
推
02/23 18:01, , 16F
02/23 18:01, 16F
推
02/23 18:01, , 17F
02/23 18:01, 17F
推
02/23 18:01, , 18F
02/23 18:01, 18F
→
02/23 18:01, , 19F
02/23 18:01, 19F
推
02/23 18:02, , 20F
02/23 18:02, 20F
推
02/23 18:05, , 21F
02/23 18:05, 21F
噓
02/23 18:14, , 22F
02/23 18:14, 22F
推
02/23 18:15, , 23F
02/23 18:15, 23F
→
02/23 18:17, , 24F
02/23 18:17, 24F
噓
02/23 18:17, , 25F
02/23 18:17, 25F
推
02/23 18:18, , 26F
02/23 18:18, 26F
推
02/23 18:19, , 27F
02/23 18:19, 27F
→
02/23 18:19, , 28F
02/23 18:19, 28F
推
02/23 18:20, , 29F
02/23 18:20, 29F
→
02/23 18:20, , 30F
02/23 18:20, 30F
→
02/23 18:22, , 31F
02/23 18:22, 31F
推
02/23 18:22, , 32F
02/23 18:22, 32F
推
02/23 18:32, , 33F
02/23 18:32, 33F
推
02/23 18:44, , 34F
02/23 18:44, 34F
推
02/23 18:45, , 35F
02/23 18:45, 35F
噓
02/23 18:45, , 36F
02/23 18:45, 36F
推
02/23 18:51, , 37F
02/23 18:51, 37F
推
02/23 18:55, , 38F
02/23 18:55, 38F
推
02/23 19:01, , 39F
02/23 19:01, 39F
推
02/23 19:03, , 40F
02/23 19:03, 40F
推
02/23 19:05, , 41F
02/23 19:05, 41F
→
02/23 19:14, , 42F
02/23 19:14, 42F
推
02/23 19:14, , 43F
02/23 19:14, 43F
推
02/23 19:18, , 44F
02/23 19:18, 44F
→
02/23 19:21, , 45F
02/23 19:21, 45F
→
02/23 19:22, , 46F
02/23 19:22, 46F
推
02/23 19:23, , 47F
02/23 19:23, 47F
噓
02/23 19:24, , 48F
02/23 19:24, 48F
推
02/23 19:46, , 49F
02/23 19:46, 49F
推
02/23 20:44, , 50F
02/23 20:44, 50F
推
02/23 23:17, , 51F
02/23 23:17, 51F
推
02/24 04:03, , 52F
02/24 04:03, 52F
推
02/24 10:03, , 53F
02/24 10:03, 53F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 4 之 5 篇):