[心得] 今天看了一天的社會新聞電子報
發現好像跟自己所處的社會不同
亂倫的亂倫、亂搞的亂搞、婚外情亂七八糟的故事一堆
好像其實自己這樣隨意切入撒一炮很容易的樣子.
結果當中想想記者天天寫這些東西,鼻血不都噴光了嗎?
然後看了一看,都是自由時報的記者寫的.
因為看過自由時報的政治陰謀論,感覺很會幻想.
所以,想問你覺得這些社會新聞是真的嗎?
若自由時報愛台灣這樣的意識型態,然後在社會新聞寫這些
不是兩手策略嗎?還是寫這些給台灣人看,這樣是好的?
但報紙也不能亂寫吧?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 115.43.51.97
※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/MenTalk/M.1413122636.A.ECE.html
推
10/12 22:06, , 1F
10/12 22:06, 1F
推
10/12 22:07, , 2F
10/12 22:07, 2F
→
10/12 22:11, , 3F
10/12 22:11, 3F
推
10/12 22:14, , 4F
10/12 22:14, 4F
推
10/12 22:24, , 5F
10/12 22:24, 5F
噓
10/12 22:26, , 6F
10/12 22:26, 6F
→
10/12 22:26, , 7F
10/12 22:26, 7F
→
10/12 22:27, , 8F
10/12 22:27, 8F
→
10/12 22:27, , 9F
10/12 22:27, 9F
→
10/12 22:27, , 10F
10/12 22:27, 10F
推
10/12 22:45, , 11F
10/12 22:45, 11F
推
10/12 22:47, , 12F
10/12 22:47, 12F
→
10/12 22:47, , 13F
10/12 22:47, 13F
→
10/12 22:48, , 14F
10/12 22:48, 14F
推
10/12 22:51, , 15F
10/12 22:51, 15F
→
10/12 22:51, , 16F
10/12 22:51, 16F
→
10/12 22:51, , 17F
10/12 22:51, 17F
推
10/12 22:52, , 18F
10/12 22:52, 18F
→
10/12 23:03, , 19F
10/12 23:03, 19F
推
10/12 23:04, , 20F
10/12 23:04, 20F
推
10/12 23:07, , 21F
10/12 23:07, 21F
推
10/12 23:15, , 22F
10/12 23:15, 22F
→
10/12 23:21, , 23F
10/12 23:21, 23F
噓
10/12 23:37, , 24F
10/12 23:37, 24F
噓
10/13 00:08, , 25F
10/13 00:08, 25F
噓
10/13 00:40, , 26F
10/13 00:40, 26F
推
10/13 00:52, , 27F
10/13 00:52, 27F
→
10/13 00:54, , 28F
10/13 00:54, 28F
→
10/13 02:50, , 29F
10/13 02:50, 29F
推
10/13 08:34, , 30F
10/13 08:34, 30F
→
10/13 08:41, , 31F
10/13 08:41, 31F
→
10/13 08:41, , 32F
10/13 08:41, 32F
噓
10/13 09:16, , 33F
10/13 09:16, 33F
→
10/13 09:17, , 34F
10/13 09:17, 34F
推
10/13 12:43, , 35F
10/13 12:43, 35F
噓
10/13 16:10, , 36F
10/13 16:10, 36F
→
10/13 16:11, , 37F
10/13 16:11, 37F
推
10/14 13:13, , 38F
10/14 13:13, 38F
→
10/14 13:14, , 39F
10/14 13:14, 39F
→
10/14 13:37, , 40F
10/14 13:37, 40F
噓
10/14 13:44, , 41F
10/14 13:44, 41F
推
10/17 09:58, , 42F
10/17 09:58, 42F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 4 篇):