Re: [新聞] 屁孩徒手拗彎i6 Plus 機身出現隙縫已回收
這樣太不公平了,就算iPhone 6 Plus真的會被徒手拗彎,也不代表它的設計有問題啊
其他家的手機就不會被徒手拗彎嗎? 這些手機也應該被徒手檢驗過!
手機 厚度
P7 6.50mm
M810 6.99mm
iPhone 6 Plus 7.10mm
Z3 7.35mm
ZC3 7.60mm
Desire 816 7.90mm
S4 7.90mm
S5 8.10mm
Note4 8.50mm
G3 8.90mm
M8 9.35mm
Lumia 930 9.80mm
※ 引述《Lsamia (samia)》之銘言:
: http://0rz.tw/iN1i6
: 蘋果新機iPhone 6和iPhone 6 Plus被爆會坐彎後,出現多項i6測試,2名少年也想這麼做
: ,但他們竟是到蘋果專賣店,拿店內試用的手機做測試,結果還真的拗彎了。
: 英國《每日鏡報》報導,2名青少年為測試新機的受壓能力,偷偷到蘋果專賣店用力拗彎
: 供顧客試玩的手機,結果iPhone 6 Plus一拗即彎,屏幕還與機身分開,露出一條小隙縫
: ,相較起來iPhone 6的承受力較佳,機身多次受壓才與屏幕微微分開。2人偷拍影片後立
: 即逃離現場,擔心會被追究破壞手機。他們事後詢問職員手機是否容易變彎,對方矢口否
: 認並稱消息只屬謠傳。(盧麗蓮/綜合報導)
: 心得:
: 英國青少年應該不是甚麼特殊的天生神力吧XD
: 不過這下子不知道會不會來約戰說彼此彎手機,
: 怎麼徒手能弄彎手機會讓人很驚訝的樣子,
: 應該要限定只能用大拇指來彎之類的(誤
: 就以這點來說感覺能給廠商不少正面循環,
: 做出又輕又薄又要堅固的機身
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 220.135.30.78
※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/MobileComm/M.1412093615.A.859.html
推
10/01 00:14, , 1F
10/01 00:14, 1F
→
10/01 00:15, , 2F
10/01 00:15, 2F
→
10/01 00:17, , 3F
10/01 00:17, 3F
推
10/01 00:19, , 4F
10/01 00:19, 4F
推
10/01 00:26, , 5F
10/01 00:26, 5F
→
10/01 00:27, , 6F
10/01 00:27, 6F
推
10/01 00:35, , 7F
10/01 00:35, 7F
→
10/01 00:35, , 8F
10/01 00:35, 8F
推
10/01 00:37, , 9F
10/01 00:37, 9F
→
10/01 00:44, , 10F
10/01 00:44, 10F
推
10/01 00:44, , 11F
10/01 00:44, 11F
→
10/01 00:44, , 12F
10/01 00:44, 12F
推
10/01 00:47, , 13F
10/01 00:47, 13F
→
10/01 00:47, , 14F
10/01 00:47, 14F
→
10/01 00:50, , 15F
10/01 00:50, 15F
推
10/01 01:00, , 16F
10/01 01:00, 16F
推
10/01 01:04, , 17F
10/01 01:04, 17F
推
10/01 01:05, , 18F
10/01 01:05, 18F
推
10/01 01:32, , 19F
10/01 01:32, 19F
→
10/01 01:50, , 20F
10/01 01:50, 20F
→
10/01 05:55, , 21F
10/01 05:55, 21F
噓
10/01 08:00, , 22F
10/01 08:00, 22F
→
10/01 08:01, , 23F
10/01 08:01, 23F
推
10/01 08:24, , 24F
10/01 08:24, 24F
→
10/01 09:00, , 25F
10/01 09:00, 25F
→
10/01 09:00, , 26F
10/01 09:00, 26F
噓
10/01 10:47, , 27F
10/01 10:47, 27F
→
10/01 10:48, , 28F
10/01 10:48, 28F
推
10/01 11:03, , 29F
10/01 11:03, 29F
推
10/01 11:13, , 30F
10/01 11:13, 30F
推
10/01 11:32, , 31F
10/01 11:32, 31F
→
10/01 11:32, , 32F
10/01 11:32, 32F
推
10/01 11:54, , 33F
10/01 11:54, 33F
→
10/01 11:54, , 34F
10/01 11:54, 34F
推
10/01 12:03, , 35F
10/01 12:03, 35F
推
10/01 12:05, , 36F
10/01 12:05, 36F
→
10/01 12:05, , 37F
10/01 12:05, 37F
推
10/01 12:16, , 38F
10/01 12:16, 38F
→
10/01 12:16, , 39F
10/01 12:16, 39F
→
10/01 12:31, , 40F
10/01 12:31, 40F
推
10/01 13:17, , 41F
10/01 13:17, 41F
推
10/01 15:02, , 42F
10/01 15:02, 42F
→
10/01 15:03, , 43F
10/01 15:03, 43F
→
10/01 15:04, , 44F
10/01 15:04, 44F
→
10/01 15:11, , 45F
10/01 15:11, 45F
→
10/01 15:20, , 46F
10/01 15:20, 46F
→
10/01 15:21, , 47F
10/01 15:21, 47F
→
10/01 16:23, , 48F
10/01 16:23, 48F
→
10/01 16:24, , 49F
10/01 16:24, 49F
推
10/01 16:34, , 50F
10/01 16:34, 50F
→
10/01 16:35, , 51F
10/01 16:35, 51F
推
10/01 18:02, , 52F
10/01 18:02, 52F
推
10/01 21:04, , 53F
10/01 21:04, 53F
推
10/02 00:54, , 54F
10/02 00:54, 54F
→
10/02 00:54, , 55F
10/02 00:54, 55F
→
10/02 00:55, , 56F
10/02 00:55, 56F
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 2 篇):