Re: [新聞] 下季交易林書豪? 籃球作家:火箭已放消息已回收
其實交易出去也好
要不然被教練搞成這樣也不是辦法
看的出來Lin是有一定水準的
但是他比較無法接受球不流動的打法
比較偏向於製造空間讓人進球的水準
但可惜後來來了哈登 教練也把重心都放在他身上
哈登又偏向停球後想辦法靠個人能力擺進
比較需要撿子彈 還有比較會無球跑動後投進跟傳球給他的後衛
覺得Asik其實可以不用交易 該動的應該是Lin
但似乎不動到Asik又不能換到頂級中鋒
不知道大家怎麼看Lin去哪隊比較適合
感覺金塊還不錯... 不知道大家怎麼看?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 114.43.22.184
推
03/12 18:37, , 1F
03/12 18:37, 1F
→
03/12 18:37, , 2F
03/12 18:37, 2F
推
03/12 18:38, , 3F
03/12 18:38, 3F
→
03/12 18:38, , 4F
03/12 18:38, 4F
推
03/12 18:38, , 5F
03/12 18:38, 5F
→
03/12 18:38, , 6F
03/12 18:38, 6F
→
03/12 18:38, , 7F
03/12 18:38, 7F
推
03/12 18:41, , 8F
03/12 18:41, 8F
推
03/12 18:47, , 9F
03/12 18:47, 9F
推
03/12 18:47, , 10F
03/12 18:47, 10F
推
03/12 18:48, , 11F
03/12 18:48, 11F
推
03/12 18:51, , 12F
03/12 18:51, 12F
推
03/12 18:53, , 13F
03/12 18:53, 13F
→
03/12 18:54, , 14F
03/12 18:54, 14F
推
03/12 18:54, , 15F
03/12 18:54, 15F
推
03/12 18:55, , 16F
03/12 18:55, 16F
推
03/12 18:55, , 17F
03/12 18:55, 17F
→
03/12 18:55, , 18F
03/12 18:55, 18F
→
03/12 18:56, , 19F
03/12 18:56, 19F
→
03/12 18:56, , 20F
03/12 18:56, 20F
推
03/12 18:57, , 21F
03/12 18:57, 21F
→
03/12 18:57, , 22F
03/12 18:57, 22F
→
03/12 18:57, , 23F
03/12 18:57, 23F
→
03/12 18:58, , 24F
03/12 18:58, 24F
→
03/12 18:58, , 25F
03/12 18:58, 25F
推
03/12 18:58, , 26F
03/12 18:58, 26F
→
03/12 18:59, , 27F
03/12 18:59, 27F
推
03/12 19:08, , 28F
03/12 19:08, 28F
推
03/12 19:18, , 29F
03/12 19:18, 29F
看的出來他應該是要林書豪會3分 而且要狠準 就像 屌菲諾一樣
※ 編輯: sasolala 來自: 114.43.22.184 (03/12 19:19)
推
03/12 19:20, , 30F
03/12 19:20, 30F
推
03/12 19:20, , 31F
03/12 19:20, 31F
→
03/12 19:21, , 32F
03/12 19:21, 32F
推
03/12 19:23, , 33F
03/12 19:23, 33F
→
03/12 19:24, , 34F
03/12 19:24, 34F
→
03/12 19:26, , 35F
03/12 19:26, 35F
推
03/12 19:27, , 36F
03/12 19:27, 36F
推
03/12 19:44, , 37F
03/12 19:44, 37F
推
03/12 19:47, , 38F
03/12 19:47, 38F
推
03/12 19:50, , 39F
03/12 19:50, 39F
→
03/12 19:58, , 40F
03/12 19:58, 40F
→
03/12 20:07, , 41F
03/12 20:07, 41F
→
03/12 20:07, , 42F
03/12 20:07, 42F
→
03/12 20:08, , 43F
03/12 20:08, 43F
→
03/12 20:10, , 44F
03/12 20:10, 44F
→
03/12 20:11, , 45F
03/12 20:11, 45F
→
03/12 20:14, , 46F
03/12 20:14, 46F
推
03/12 20:20, , 47F
03/12 20:20, 47F
→
03/12 20:21, , 48F
03/12 20:21, 48F
→
03/12 20:21, , 49F
03/12 20:21, 49F
→
03/12 20:22, , 50F
03/12 20:22, 50F
→
03/12 20:35, , 51F
03/12 20:35, 51F
推
03/12 20:48, , 52F
03/12 20:48, 52F
→
03/12 20:48, , 53F
03/12 20:48, 53F
推
03/12 21:10, , 54F
03/12 21:10, 54F
→
03/12 21:12, , 55F
03/12 21:12, 55F
推
03/12 21:19, , 56F
03/12 21:19, 56F
推
03/12 21:23, , 57F
03/12 21:23, 57F
推
03/12 22:06, , 58F
03/12 22:06, 58F
推
03/12 22:09, , 59F
03/12 22:09, 59F
→
03/12 22:28, , 60F
03/12 22:28, 60F
→
03/12 22:29, , 61F
03/12 22:29, 61F
推
03/12 23:18, , 62F
03/12 23:18, 62F
推
03/13 00:11, , 63F
03/13 00:11, 63F
→
03/13 00:11, , 64F
03/13 00:11, 64F
→
03/13 00:12, , 65F
03/13 00:12, 65F
推
03/13 00:13, , 66F
03/13 00:13, 66F
→
03/13 00:13, , 67F
03/13 00:13, 67F
→
03/13 00:14, , 68F
03/13 00:14, 68F
推
03/13 00:18, , 69F
03/13 00:18, 69F
→
03/13 00:19, , 70F
03/13 00:19, 70F
→
03/13 00:19, , 71F
03/13 00:19, 71F
→
03/13 00:28, , 72F
03/13 00:28, 72F
→
03/13 06:11, , 73F
03/13 06:11, 73F
→
03/13 06:11, , 74F
03/13 06:11, 74F
→
03/13 06:12, , 75F
03/13 06:12, 75F
→
03/13 06:12, , 76F
03/13 06:12, 76F
→
03/13 06:13, , 77F
03/13 06:13, 77F
→
03/13 06:14, , 78F
03/13 06:14, 78F
→
03/13 09:18, , 79F
03/13 09:18, 79F
推
03/13 09:44, , 80F
03/13 09:44, 80F
→
03/13 12:11, , 81F
03/13 12:11, 81F
推
03/13 12:25, , 82F
03/13 12:25, 82F
→
03/13 12:25, , 83F
03/13 12:25, 83F
→
03/13 12:26, , 84F
03/13 12:26, 84F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 3 篇):