Re: [外絮] 撤換了Frank後~~Kidd教頭簡化了防守已回收
※ 引述《YummyKidd (悠米)》之銘言:
: Sometimes less is more, and simpler is better. At least, that’s the case with
: the Nets’ scaled-back schemes that — at least appear to have — helped spark
: their recent resurgence.
: 有時候~~說得少比長篇大論更能更好~~
: 至少在逐漸復甦的籃網身上看到了這一點~~
: “I’ve simplified it,’’ said rookie head coach Jason Kidd.
: “That’s as good as it gets, when you simplify things and guys have bought in
: and guys are doing it at a high level right now.’’
: 籃網現任教練老基表示~~已經將很多不必要的東西都簡化了~~
: 現在可以專注在更高水準的事情上~~
: Kidd had reassigned assistant coach Lawrence Frank two games prior to that,
: demoting the de facto defensive coordinator to doing “daily reports.”
: 老基將勞掄斯法蘭克重新安排到球探一職~~
: 負責每日報表的工作~~
: “Lawrence was always kind of the defensive guy, so he was talking on defense
: and he was definitely long-winded when it came to teaching, so I definitely t
: hink it’s helped,’’ Deron Williams said.
: 球隊主控碟龍表示~~法蘭克對防守雖然有見解~~但總是長篇大論~~
: 或許有幫助~~但那是在教學上的幫助~~
: “We’re a veteran group, we get things pretty easily. So at times when you’re
: just talking and we’re not practicing, it gets a little lengthy. But I think
: J-Kidd does a good job of getting his points across quick and easy and then we
: move on.’’
: 碟龍接著說~~尤其是我們經驗這麼豐富的團隊~~明明事情很容易的~~
: 卻要浪費時間在冗長的事情上~~
: 因此老基簡化防守後~~對球隊反而更加有幫助~~可以花更多的時間在訓練上~~
: “Yeah, I think it has,’’ Joe Johnson said.
: “I think we’ve been communicating. Jason’s been on us a lot, especially in
: practices, about communicating, talking to one another, and making everybody’
: s job easy.
: 記者問及JJ的想法~~他也對老基大表贊同~~
: 老基與每個人溝通~~讓大家有了更多的交流~~讓每個人的工作變得更簡單~~
: “Yeah, definitely. He’s basically learned on the fly,’’ Johnson said.
: “So I think as each game goes, he gets better or he tweaks it a little more or
: he gets more vocal or whatever the case may be. He’s definitely gotten a lot
: better.’’
: 對於老基的執教~~JJ也是讚不絕口~~認為越來越棒了~~
: http://nypost.com/2013/12/17/kidds-nets-thrive-with-simplified-scheme/
我好奇去查了一下 法禿離開前後 籃網得失分的變化
PF PA DIFF date
Brooklyn 95.3 102.8 -7.5 12/4 法禿被炒
94.4 102.3 -7.9 12/10 D-Will回歸
97.2 101.8 -4.6 12/20 Lopez報銷
97.0 102.1 -5.1 12/29 now
法禿被炒以後到D-Will回歸前 籃網場均失分大概少了0.5 但是得分卻少了0.9
而D-Will回歸以後 比較明顯的是得分場均增加了2.8 失分少了0.5
最後Lopez報銷 DIFF到現在又少少了0.5
仔細看法禿就算被調走 對籃網防守似乎影響不大 甚至在得分上下滑了
而12/4-12/10的對手是 金塊 尼克 公鹿 也不是什麼特別強的隊伍
說是因為對上強隊才導致如此變化 似乎也說不通
看來看去會稍微變強一點 主要還是D-Will回歸吧 法禿有沒有被調職這個因素很像
不大 甚至調職以後籃網還有變弱的傾向 所以說法禿導致籃網戰術混亂 似乎也說不過去吧
而且我也看不出來失分從102.8-101.8 有很大的差異 與其歸功於老基少了亂子可以放手幹
還不如說是D-Will復出Carry整隊吧
而糗爺首席弟子YummyKidd說 籃網即將飛天 我倒是拭目以待啦
籃網1月的對手分別是
1/1@馬刺 1/3@雷霆 1/5 騎士 1/7 老鷹 1/9 勇士 1/11 熱火 1/12@暴龍
1/17@老鷹 1/21@尼克 1/22 魔術 1/25 小牛 1/27@賽爾提克 1/28 暴龍
7主6客 一半一半 而且我不知道那些球隊對籃網算是弱隊 那些算是強隊
很像都比籃網強 不知道到時候DIFF變化會變成怎樣 會不會如同外絮所述 防守戰術簡化
以後 效率會變好 請大家拭目以待 而本人粗估4勝9敗 不知道到時會是什麼情形
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
題外話
我翻翻今日BOX發現綠血人KG 今日1-5 怒得兩分 所以我去查了當初跟他比拚第一前鋒的
幾位老將 被KG嗆媽媽的TD 和 KG迷認為不可能比KG強的德佬
算算他們平均拿一分 要花多少薪資
KG今年拿1200萬 而籃網打了30場 目前每場大概花費薪資439萬
而KG打到現在得了179分 所以每分大概要花費2.45萬鎂
而照這樣算起來 TD每分大概花費0.96萬鎂 而薪資大概快KG兩倍的德佬 平均每分也才
1.29萬鎂 似乎也是十分超值 籃網老闆看了大概臉都綠了吧 當初齊名的大前鋒怎麼
現在差那麼多?
--
作者 bgp915117 (Utley) DET 0 1 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 5R 8H 1E 看板 Baseball
標題 [轉播] 紅襪破蛋了!! BOS 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 4 1 6R 7H 1E
噓
10/14 10:47,
10/14 10:47
作者 wtt168 (得I20=burn $$$$$$$$$$$$) 看板 Baseball
標題 [先發] ALCS美聯冠軍戰 Game 6 DET 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2R 8H 1E
噓 Celtic8879:襪迷要開始龜了XD BOS 0 0 0 0 1 0 4 0 X 5R 5H 1E 10/20 10:29
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 111.249.94.194
推
12/29 23:40, , 1F
12/29 23:40, 1F
推
12/29 23:41, , 2F
12/29 23:41, 2F
→
12/29 23:43, , 3F
12/29 23:43, 3F
推
12/29 23:46, , 4F
12/29 23:46, 4F
→
12/29 23:47, , 5F
12/29 23:47, 5F
推
12/29 23:47, , 6F
12/29 23:47, 6F
推
12/29 23:51, , 7F
12/29 23:51, 7F
推
12/29 23:51, , 8F
12/29 23:51, 8F
推
12/29 23:53, , 9F
12/29 23:53, 9F
推
12/29 23:54, , 10F
12/29 23:54, 10F
推
12/29 23:55, , 11F
12/29 23:55, 11F
噓
12/29 23:59, , 12F
12/29 23:59, 12F
→
12/29 23:59, , 13F
12/29 23:59, 13F
推
12/30 00:03, , 14F
12/30 00:03, 14F
推
12/30 00:12, , 15F
12/30 00:12, 15F
→
12/30 00:16, , 16F
12/30 00:16, 16F
→
12/30 00:21, , 17F
12/30 00:21, 17F
噓
12/30 00:21, , 18F
12/30 00:21, 18F
推
12/30 00:45, , 19F
12/30 00:45, 19F
→
12/30 00:58, , 20F
12/30 00:58, 20F
推
12/30 01:07, , 21F
12/30 01:07, 21F
推
12/30 01:12, , 22F
12/30 01:12, 22F
推
12/30 01:15, , 23F
12/30 01:15, 23F
推
12/30 01:16, , 24F
12/30 01:16, 24F
→
12/30 01:26, , 25F
12/30 01:26, 25F
→
12/30 01:30, , 26F
12/30 01:30, 26F
推
12/30 01:49, , 27F
12/30 01:49, 27F
推
12/30 02:08, , 28F
12/30 02:08, 28F
→
12/30 02:22, , 29F
12/30 02:22, 29F
噓
12/30 04:28, , 30F
12/30 04:28, 30F
推
12/30 07:46, , 31F
12/30 07:46, 31F
噓
12/30 07:53, , 32F
12/30 07:53, 32F
推
12/30 12:05, , 33F
12/30 12:05, 33F
噓
02/07 11:35, , 34F
02/07 11:35, 34F
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
完整討論串 (本文為第 3 之 3 篇):