Re: [討論] 林書豪炸彈丟出來,Young拆解絕殺(圖解)
※ 引述《FairyBomb (空想炸彈)》之銘言:
: 如果今天Young沒投進,大家覺得是Lin被罵還是Young被罵,這答案顯而易
: 見。
確實是Lin沒處理好, 這球如果沒進罵Young才奇怪
: 要是今天傳球的人是老普,大概也不會有這麼多人對這球批評指教。
球迷本來就只會關注自己喜歡(或討厭)的球員
所以Lin表現好會被林迷放大
Lin表現差也會被林酸放大
這很正常
: 說實話啦,今天不管Lin傳給誰、或是他自己拔起來幹。只要球沒進絕對是
: 被鄉民幹翻,還好Young有投進,不然就不只是"檢討"這麼簡單囉。
: 這場能"檢討"的地方這麼多,偏偏抓著這個贏球的Play狂檢討,我是覺得還
: 有趣的啦,科科。
萬一Young沒進而輸球
這球也不會是主因沒錯
但那麼多人會出來討論這球
不光是這球處理得不好
而是有很多人明明Lin處理得不好
卻還硬要反駁護航...
[新聞] Kobe垃圾話刺激 豪妙傳準絕殺 湖人硬拔
有人質疑拿新聞不公平, 所以找了幾個:
: 有人問為甚麼不給底線
: 馬刺那邊也有下陷阱,所以給底線根本不合理,一堆人在臉書說為什麼不傳底線根本呵
: 呵
=> 實在看不出有陷阱
: 一堆人看不清傳這球的智慧只會講失誤真是無言
=> 真的不清楚這球的智慧在哪
沒興趣酸Lin
只是這球真的沒處理好
但也沒甚麼大不了的
再神的球員也會有沒處理好的球
但實在沒必要黑的硬要說成白的..
有人質疑為何不檢討教練調度
其實也不是沒有
只是沒有人出來護航
自然很快就討論完了
[心得] 懂了嗎? Byron Scott就是個西瓜
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 111.185.70.177
※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1418534528.A.D31.html
推
12/14 13:23, , 1F
12/14 13:23, 1F
→
12/14 13:24, , 2F
12/14 13:24, 2F
→
12/14 13:25, , 3F
12/14 13:25, 3F
→
12/14 13:25, , 4F
12/14 13:25, 4F
→
12/14 13:25, , 5F
12/14 13:25, 5F
噓
12/14 13:27, , 6F
12/14 13:27, 6F
→
12/14 13:27, , 7F
12/14 13:27, 7F
→
12/14 13:29, , 8F
12/14 13:29, 8F
噓
12/14 13:30, , 9F
12/14 13:30, 9F
推
12/14 13:30, , 10F
12/14 13:30, 10F
→
12/14 13:30, , 11F
12/14 13:30, 11F
→
12/14 13:30, , 12F
12/14 13:30, 12F
→
12/14 13:30, , 13F
12/14 13:30, 13F
→
12/14 13:31, , 14F
12/14 13:31, 14F
→
12/14 13:31, , 15F
12/14 13:31, 15F
→
12/14 13:31, , 16F
12/14 13:31, 16F
→
12/14 13:31, , 17F
12/14 13:31, 17F
推
12/14 13:32, , 18F
12/14 13:32, 18F
噓
12/14 13:34, , 19F
12/14 13:34, 19F
噓
12/14 13:34, , 20F
12/14 13:34, 20F
推
12/14 13:42, , 21F
12/14 13:42, 21F
→
12/14 13:43, , 22F
12/14 13:43, 22F
噓
12/14 13:50, , 23F
12/14 13:50, 23F
→
12/14 13:50, , 24F
12/14 13:50, 24F
→
12/14 13:51, , 25F
12/14 13:51, 25F
推
12/14 13:52, , 26F
12/14 13:52, 26F
推
12/14 13:52, , 27F
12/14 13:52, 27F
→
12/14 13:53, , 28F
12/14 13:53, 28F
→
12/14 13:53, , 29F
12/14 13:53, 29F
→
12/14 13:53, , 30F
12/14 13:53, 30F
→
12/14 13:54, , 31F
12/14 13:54, 31F
→
12/14 13:54, , 32F
12/14 13:54, 32F
→
12/14 13:54, , 33F
12/14 13:54, 33F
→
12/14 13:55, , 34F
12/14 13:55, 34F
→
12/14 13:55, , 35F
12/14 13:55, 35F
推
12/14 13:55, , 36F
12/14 13:55, 36F
→
12/14 13:56, , 37F
12/14 13:56, 37F
→
12/14 13:56, , 38F
12/14 13:56, 38F
推
12/14 13:59, , 39F
12/14 13:59, 39F
還有 27 則推文
→
12/14 14:37, , 67F
12/14 14:37, 67F
推
12/14 14:37, , 68F
12/14 14:37, 68F
推
12/14 14:38, , 69F
12/14 14:38, 69F
→
12/14 14:38, , 70F
12/14 14:38, 70F
→
12/14 14:38, , 71F
12/14 14:38, 71F
→
12/14 14:39, , 72F
12/14 14:39, 72F
→
12/14 14:39, , 73F
12/14 14:39, 73F
→
12/14 14:39, , 74F
12/14 14:39, 74F
推
12/14 14:41, , 75F
12/14 14:41, 75F
推
12/14 14:50, , 76F
12/14 14:50, 76F
推
12/14 14:54, , 77F
12/14 14:54, 77F
→
12/14 14:54, , 78F
12/14 14:54, 78F
噓
12/14 15:01, , 79F
12/14 15:01, 79F
噓
12/14 15:03, , 80F
12/14 15:03, 80F
→
12/14 15:04, , 81F
12/14 15:04, 81F
推
12/14 15:08, , 82F
12/14 15:08, 82F
→
12/14 15:10, , 83F
12/14 15:10, 83F
→
12/14 15:10, , 84F
12/14 15:10, 84F
→
12/14 15:12, , 85F
12/14 15:12, 85F
→
12/14 15:13, , 86F
12/14 15:13, 86F
推
12/14 15:21, , 87F
12/14 15:21, 87F
→
12/14 15:21, , 88F
12/14 15:21, 88F
→
12/14 15:23, , 89F
12/14 15:23, 89F
推
12/14 15:29, , 90F
12/14 15:29, 90F
→
12/14 15:29, , 91F
12/14 15:29, 91F
噓
12/14 15:43, , 92F
12/14 15:43, 92F
噓
12/14 15:57, , 93F
12/14 15:57, 93F
噓
12/14 16:25, , 94F
12/14 16:25, 94F
噓
12/14 16:32, , 95F
12/14 16:32, 95F
噓
12/14 16:35, , 96F
12/14 16:35, 96F
→
12/14 16:37, , 97F
12/14 16:37, 97F
→
12/14 17:26, , 98F
12/14 17:26, 98F
→
12/14 17:48, , 99F
12/14 17:48, 99F
→
12/14 18:11, , 100F
12/14 18:11, 100F
噓
12/14 19:44, , 101F
12/14 19:44, 101F
→
12/14 20:06, , 102F
12/14 20:06, 102F
→
12/14 20:06, , 103F
12/14 20:06, 103F
※ 編輯: allen999 (1.161.132.96), 12/14/2014 20:33:04
※ 編輯: allen999 (1.161.132.96), 12/14/2014 20:34:00
※ 編輯: allen999 (1.161.132.96), 12/14/2014 20:34:15
→
12/14 21:58, , 104F
12/14 21:58, 104F
噓
12/15 01:07, , 105F
12/15 01:07, 105F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 4 之 5 篇):