[討論] 為何Chris Paul可以入選防守第一隊?
大家好
山雞哥我看NBA也看了十幾年了
因為本身有在打球
在我的認知中防守是贏得比賽的關鍵
以後衛來說是防守的第一道牆
好的防守後衛可以幫助內線球員減輕很多壓力
但我很納悶的一點是
為什麼保羅可以進防守年度第一隊呢
雖然他抄截數據不錯
但抄截是一種賭博 有可能造成更大的漏洞
真正判斷會不會防守不應該由數據上看吧
更何況保羅在球場上的工作不是以防守為主
防守第一隊應該是由專職防守的球員入選
感覺帕克、里拉德、康利、龍多、LIN
都比他有資格進
保羅能入選難道只是聯盟想捧他嗎?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 61.223.35.125
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1438515183.A.2B5.html
→
08/02 19:33, , 1F
08/02 19:33, 1F
→
08/02 19:34, , 2F
08/02 19:34, 2F
噓
08/02 19:34, , 3F
08/02 19:34, 3F
推
08/02 19:34, , 4F
08/02 19:34, 4F
→
08/02 19:37, , 5F
08/02 19:37, 5F
推
08/02 19:37, , 6F
08/02 19:37, 6F
我是真的覺得他滿髒的
※ 編輯: KobeIsDoggy (61.223.35.125), 08/02/2015 19:38:03
噓
08/02 19:38, , 7F
08/02 19:38, 7F
噓
08/02 19:38, , 8F
08/02 19:38, 8F
噓
08/02 19:38, , 9F
08/02 19:38, 9F
噓
08/02 19:38, , 10F
08/02 19:38, 10F
推
08/02 19:39, , 11F
08/02 19:39, 11F
推
08/02 19:39, , 12F
08/02 19:39, 12F
推
08/02 19:40, , 13F
08/02 19:40, 13F
噓
08/02 19:40, , 14F
08/02 19:40, 14F
噓
08/02 19:41, , 15F
08/02 19:41, 15F
噓
08/02 19:41, , 16F
08/02 19:41, 16F
→
08/02 19:43, , 17F
08/02 19:43, 17F
噓
08/02 19:43, , 18F
08/02 19:43, 18F
推
08/02 19:43, , 19F
08/02 19:43, 19F
噓
08/02 19:45, , 20F
08/02 19:45, 20F
推
08/02 19:45, , 21F
08/02 19:45, 21F
噓
08/02 19:47, , 22F
08/02 19:47, 22F
噓
08/02 19:47, , 23F
08/02 19:47, 23F
推
08/02 19:48, , 24F
08/02 19:48, 24F
噓
08/02 19:51, , 25F
08/02 19:51, 25F
推
08/02 19:52, , 26F
08/02 19:52, 26F
推
08/02 19:54, , 27F
08/02 19:54, 27F
噓
08/02 19:54, , 28F
08/02 19:54, 28F
噓
08/02 19:56, , 29F
08/02 19:56, 29F
推
08/02 19:57, , 30F
08/02 19:57, 30F
噓
08/02 19:57, , 31F
08/02 19:57, 31F
→
08/02 19:57, , 32F
08/02 19:57, 32F
→
08/02 19:58, , 33F
08/02 19:58, 33F
→
08/02 19:58, , 34F
08/02 19:58, 34F
→
08/02 19:58, , 35F
08/02 19:58, 35F
噓
08/02 19:59, , 36F
08/02 19:59, 36F
→
08/02 20:00, , 37F
08/02 20:00, 37F
→
08/02 20:00, , 38F
08/02 20:00, 38F
→
08/02 20:07, , 39F
08/02 20:07, 39F
推
08/02 20:08, , 40F
08/02 20:08, 40F
→
08/02 20:11, , 41F
08/02 20:11, 41F
→
08/02 20:12, , 42F
08/02 20:12, 42F
→
08/02 20:13, , 43F
08/02 20:13, 43F
噓
08/02 20:13, , 44F
08/02 20:13, 44F
推
08/02 20:13, , 45F
08/02 20:13, 45F
→
08/02 20:14, , 46F
08/02 20:14, 46F
噓
08/02 20:16, , 47F
08/02 20:16, 47F
噓
08/02 20:19, , 48F
08/02 20:19, 48F
噓
08/02 20:21, , 49F
08/02 20:21, 49F
噓
08/02 20:26, , 50F
08/02 20:26, 50F
→
08/02 20:27, , 51F
08/02 20:27, 51F
噓
08/02 20:30, , 52F
08/02 20:30, 52F
→
08/02 20:32, , 53F
08/02 20:32, 53F
→
08/02 20:33, , 54F
08/02 20:33, 54F
噓
08/02 20:35, , 55F
08/02 20:35, 55F
噓
08/02 20:37, , 56F
08/02 20:37, 56F
噓
08/02 20:41, , 57F
08/02 20:41, 57F
→
08/02 20:42, , 58F
08/02 20:42, 58F
噓
08/02 20:44, , 59F
08/02 20:44, 59F
噓
08/02 20:45, , 60F
08/02 20:45, 60F
→
08/02 20:46, , 61F
08/02 20:46, 61F
噓
08/02 20:52, , 62F
08/02 20:52, 62F
噓
08/02 21:04, , 63F
08/02 21:04, 63F
推
08/02 21:07, , 64F
08/02 21:07, 64F
噓
08/02 21:11, , 65F
08/02 21:11, 65F
噓
08/02 21:16, , 66F
08/02 21:16, 66F
→
08/02 21:28, , 67F
08/02 21:28, 67F
噓
08/02 21:37, , 68F
08/02 21:37, 68F
→
08/02 21:49, , 69F
08/02 21:49, 69F
噓
08/02 21:49, , 70F
08/02 21:49, 70F
噓
08/02 21:51, , 71F
08/02 21:51, 71F
推
08/02 21:51, , 72F
08/02 21:51, 72F
噓
08/02 21:51, , 73F
08/02 21:51, 73F
噓
08/02 22:20, , 74F
08/02 22:20, 74F
噓
08/02 22:21, , 75F
08/02 22:21, 75F
噓
08/02 22:31, , 76F
08/02 22:31, 76F
噓
08/02 22:57, , 77F
08/02 22:57, 77F
噓
08/02 23:16, , 78F
08/02 23:16, 78F
噓
08/02 23:33, , 79F
08/02 23:33, 79F
噓
08/02 23:55, , 80F
08/02 23:55, 80F
噓
08/02 23:57, , 81F
08/02 23:57, 81F
噓
08/02 23:57, , 82F
08/02 23:57, 82F
噓
08/03 00:08, , 83F
08/03 00:08, 83F
噓
08/03 00:55, , 84F
08/03 00:55, 84F
噓
08/03 02:15, , 85F
08/03 02:15, 85F
噓
08/03 07:11, , 86F
08/03 07:11, 86F
噓
08/03 09:02, , 87F
08/03 09:02, 87F
噓
08/03 09:47, , 88F
08/03 09:47, 88F
推
08/03 12:58, , 89F
08/03 12:58, 89F
→
08/03 12:58, , 90F
08/03 12:58, 90F
→
08/03 12:58, , 91F
08/03 12:58, 91F
→
08/03 20:03, , 92F
08/03 20:03, 92F
噓
08/03 22:11, , 93F
08/03 22:11, 93F
噓
08/04 01:16, , 94F
08/04 01:16, 94F
→
08/05 10:29, , 95F
08/05 10:29, 95F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):