[外絮] Harper認為現行NBA規則下公牛可拿78勝
Ron Harper says the 1995-96 Bulls would sweep the Warriors
http://tinyurl.com/pjpv4gy
72-10 would be 78-4 with these rules and players.
https://twitter.com/HARPER04_5/status/665311740285067264
Ron Harper 認為當年72勝的公牛隊,在現行的NBA規則和球員,可拿下78勝
因為"橫掃論"引發了網友熱議,所以 Harper 最後補充:
Ok i was bored with life i'm over the debate of the #72-10 bulls team
and the champ GS
“好吧,我的生活很無聊,我已經不想再爭論72勝公牛和總冠軍勇士了。”
ok i'll give them 2 games as long as we win....
“好吧,我可以給他們(勇士)贏2場,只要最終是我們贏...”
CBS的記者最後提到:假使有時光機,誰會去守 Curry ?...
Here's my question:
If we had a time machine, who would guard Stephen Curry?
Harper, Michael Jordan or Scottie Pippen?
I'd go with Pippen.
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 125.230.101.156
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1447729956.A.D0C.html
→
11/17 11:13, , 1F
11/17 11:13, 1F
推
11/17 11:13, , 2F
11/17 11:13, 2F
→
11/17 11:13, , 3F
11/17 11:13, 3F
→
11/17 11:13, , 4F
11/17 11:13, 4F
※ 編輯: makihara (125.230.101.156), 11/17/2015 11:13:58
噓
11/17 11:13, , 5F
11/17 11:13, 5F
→
11/17 11:14, , 6F
11/17 11:14, 6F
推
11/17 11:14, , 7F
11/17 11:14, 7F
→
11/17 11:15, , 8F
11/17 11:15, 8F
噓
11/17 11:16, , 9F
11/17 11:16, 9F
→
11/17 11:16, , 10F
11/17 11:16, 10F
噓
11/17 11:16, , 11F
11/17 11:16, 11F
噓
11/17 11:17, , 12F
11/17 11:17, 12F
噓
11/17 11:18, , 13F
11/17 11:18, 13F
噓
11/17 11:19, , 14F
11/17 11:19, 14F
→
11/17 11:20, , 15F
11/17 11:20, 15F
→
11/17 11:20, , 16F
11/17 11:20, 16F
推
11/17 11:21, , 17F
11/17 11:21, 17F
→
11/17 11:22, , 18F
11/17 11:22, 18F
推
11/17 11:22, , 19F
11/17 11:22, 19F
推
11/17 11:22, , 20F
11/17 11:22, 20F
噓
11/17 11:22, , 21F
11/17 11:22, 21F
推
11/17 11:23, , 22F
11/17 11:23, 22F
推
11/17 11:24, , 23F
11/17 11:24, 23F
→
11/17 11:24, , 24F
11/17 11:24, 24F
噓
11/17 11:24, , 25F
11/17 11:24, 25F
噓
11/17 11:25, , 26F
11/17 11:25, 26F
推
11/17 11:25, , 27F
11/17 11:25, 27F
推
11/17 11:25, , 28F
11/17 11:25, 28F
噓
11/17 11:27, , 29F
11/17 11:27, 29F
噓
11/17 11:28, , 30F
11/17 11:28, 30F
推
11/17 11:28, , 31F
11/17 11:28, 31F
推
11/17 11:29, , 32F
11/17 11:29, 32F
→
11/17 11:30, , 33F
11/17 11:30, 33F
推
11/17 11:31, , 34F
11/17 11:31, 34F
噓
11/17 11:31, , 35F
11/17 11:31, 35F
→
11/17 11:32, , 36F
11/17 11:32, 36F
→
11/17 11:32, , 37F
11/17 11:32, 37F
→
11/17 11:34, , 38F
11/17 11:34, 38F
還有 45 則推文
推
11/17 15:32, , 84F
11/17 15:32, 84F
推
11/17 15:34, , 85F
11/17 15:34, 85F
→
11/17 15:34, , 86F
11/17 15:34, 86F
推
11/17 15:38, , 87F
11/17 15:38, 87F
推
11/17 15:39, , 88F
11/17 15:39, 88F
推
11/17 16:01, , 89F
11/17 16:01, 89F
噓
11/17 16:35, , 90F
11/17 16:35, 90F
→
11/17 16:36, , 91F
11/17 16:36, 91F
噓
11/17 16:50, , 92F
11/17 16:50, 92F
噓
11/17 16:55, , 93F
11/17 16:55, 93F
推
11/17 16:58, , 94F
11/17 16:58, 94F
推
11/17 17:04, , 95F
11/17 17:04, 95F
→
11/17 17:05, , 96F
11/17 17:05, 96F
推
11/17 17:07, , 97F
11/17 17:07, 97F
推
11/17 17:11, , 98F
11/17 17:11, 98F
推
11/17 17:18, , 99F
11/17 17:18, 99F
→
11/17 17:18, , 100F
11/17 17:18, 100F
→
11/17 17:18, , 101F
11/17 17:18, 101F
推
11/17 17:56, , 102F
11/17 17:56, 102F
噓
11/17 19:11, , 103F
11/17 19:11, 103F
推
11/17 19:26, , 104F
11/17 19:26, 104F
→
11/17 19:32, , 105F
11/17 19:32, 105F
→
11/17 19:34, , 106F
11/17 19:34, 106F
推
11/17 20:20, , 107F
11/17 20:20, 107F
推
11/17 21:46, , 108F
11/17 21:46, 108F
噓
11/17 23:02, , 109F
11/17 23:02, 109F
→
11/17 23:02, , 110F
11/17 23:02, 110F
推
11/17 23:31, , 111F
11/17 23:31, 111F
→
11/17 23:31, , 112F
11/17 23:31, 112F
噓
11/18 04:50, , 113F
11/18 04:50, 113F
噓
11/18 04:52, , 114F
11/18 04:52, 114F
噓
11/19 16:48, , 115F
11/19 16:48, 115F
→
11/19 16:49, , 116F
11/19 16:49, 116F
推
11/19 18:12, , 117F
11/19 18:12, 117F
→
11/19 18:12, , 118F
11/19 18:12, 118F
推
11/19 18:16, , 119F
11/19 18:16, 119F
噓
11/19 19:49, , 120F
11/19 19:49, 120F
推
11/19 19:52, , 121F
11/19 19:52, 121F
推
11/19 21:30, , 122F
11/19 21:30, 122F
推
11/19 22:04, , 123F
11/19 22:04, 123F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 6 篇):