[討論] Westbrook的防守傷害了雷霆?
溪河在進攻端的積極 侵略性配合小一號姆斯的體型和爆發力
只要他自己沒腦衝或是外線打鐵 幾乎對各隊後場都是無解的存在
但是這個影片裏面剪出來的結果
溪河的防守觀念似乎有點問題
各種快攻退防太慢 補防不及或是在弱邊發呆沒跟上作為隊友被過的第二道防線
有沒有版友們 可以分析一下
相較於防守被低估的KD
溪河的防守是不是有點傷害球隊呢?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 59.115.3.252
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1464704557.A.4AA.html
推
05/31 22:25, , 1F
05/31 22:25, 1F
推
05/31 22:25, , 2F
05/31 22:25, 2F
→
05/31 22:25, , 3F
05/31 22:25, 3F
→
05/31 22:26, , 4F
05/31 22:26, 4F
推
05/31 22:27, , 5F
05/31 22:27, 5F
→
05/31 22:29, , 6F
05/31 22:29, 6F
→
05/31 22:30, , 7F
05/31 22:30, 7F
推
05/31 22:30, , 8F
05/31 22:30, 8F
→
05/31 22:31, , 9F
05/31 22:31, 9F
推
05/31 22:31, , 10F
05/31 22:31, 10F
→
05/31 22:32, , 11F
05/31 22:32, 11F
→
05/31 22:32, , 12F
05/31 22:32, 12F
推
05/31 22:33, , 13F
05/31 22:33, 13F
→
05/31 22:33, , 14F
05/31 22:33, 14F
推
05/31 22:33, , 15F
05/31 22:33, 15F
→
05/31 22:33, , 16F
05/31 22:33, 16F
→
05/31 22:33, , 17F
05/31 22:33, 17F
推
05/31 22:35, , 18F
05/31 22:35, 18F
推
05/31 22:36, , 19F
05/31 22:36, 19F
推
05/31 22:37, , 20F
05/31 22:37, 20F
→
05/31 22:37, , 21F
05/31 22:37, 21F
推
05/31 22:37, , 22F
05/31 22:37, 22F
→
05/31 22:38, , 23F
05/31 22:38, 23F
推
05/31 22:39, , 24F
05/31 22:39, 24F
→
05/31 22:39, , 25F
05/31 22:39, 25F
→
05/31 22:39, , 26F
05/31 22:39, 26F
推
05/31 22:41, , 27F
05/31 22:41, 27F
推
05/31 22:41, , 28F
05/31 22:41, 28F
推
05/31 22:41, , 29F
05/31 22:41, 29F
推
05/31 22:41, , 30F
05/31 22:41, 30F
推
05/31 22:41, , 31F
05/31 22:41, 31F
推
05/31 22:41, , 32F
05/31 22:41, 32F
→
05/31 22:42, , 33F
05/31 22:42, 33F
→
05/31 22:42, , 34F
05/31 22:42, 34F
→
05/31 22:42, , 35F
05/31 22:42, 35F
→
05/31 22:42, , 36F
05/31 22:42, 36F
→
05/31 22:43, , 37F
05/31 22:43, 37F
→
05/31 22:43, , 38F
05/31 22:43, 38F
推
05/31 22:43, , 39F
05/31 22:43, 39F
還有 49 則推文
→
05/31 23:45, , 89F
05/31 23:45, 89F
推
05/31 23:47, , 90F
05/31 23:47, 90F
推
05/31 23:55, , 91F
05/31 23:55, 91F
推
05/31 23:55, , 92F
05/31 23:55, 92F
推
06/01 00:00, , 93F
06/01 00:00, 93F
推
06/01 00:05, , 94F
06/01 00:05, 94F
→
06/01 00:09, , 95F
06/01 00:09, 95F
→
06/01 00:09, , 96F
06/01 00:09, 96F
→
06/01 00:09, , 97F
06/01 00:09, 97F
→
06/01 00:10, , 98F
06/01 00:10, 98F
→
06/01 00:30, , 99F
06/01 00:30, 99F
→
06/01 00:31, , 100F
06/01 00:31, 100F
推
06/01 00:40, , 101F
06/01 00:40, 101F
→
06/01 00:40, , 102F
06/01 00:40, 102F
推
06/01 00:42, , 103F
06/01 00:42, 103F
推
06/01 00:44, , 104F
06/01 00:44, 104F
推
06/01 00:59, , 105F
06/01 00:59, 105F
推
06/01 01:09, , 106F
06/01 01:09, 106F
推
06/01 01:37, , 107F
06/01 01:37, 107F
推
06/01 02:02, , 108F
06/01 02:02, 108F
推
06/01 03:25, , 109F
06/01 03:25, 109F
→
06/01 03:25, , 110F
06/01 03:25, 110F
→
06/01 03:26, , 111F
06/01 03:26, 111F
→
06/01 03:26, , 112F
06/01 03:26, 112F
推
06/01 06:32, , 113F
06/01 06:32, 113F
推
06/01 08:03, , 114F
06/01 08:03, 114F
噓
06/01 08:30, , 115F
06/01 08:30, 115F
噓
06/01 10:14, , 116F
06/01 10:14, 116F
推
06/01 10:20, , 117F
06/01 10:20, 117F
推
06/01 10:36, , 118F
06/01 10:36, 118F
推
06/01 12:46, , 119F
06/01 12:46, 119F
→
06/01 12:47, , 120F
06/01 12:47, 120F
推
06/01 12:47, , 121F
06/01 12:47, 121F
推
06/01 13:01, , 122F
06/01 13:01, 122F
→
06/01 20:56, , 123F
06/01 20:56, 123F
→
06/01 20:56, , 124F
06/01 20:56, 124F
推
06/02 03:37, , 125F
06/02 03:37, 125F
噓
06/02 04:37, , 126F
06/02 04:37, 126F
→
06/02 04:37, , 127F
06/02 04:37, 127F
推
06/02 13:52, , 128F
06/02 13:52, 128F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 4 篇):