[討論] 勇士是史上最抗哨的隊伍嗎
如題 小弟跟朋友們賭了雞排勇士贏
贏了就有好幾片免費的雞排可以吃 是不是很咖勳的事呢
有跟比賽的大家應該都知道R
今天的比賽 主場哨似乎有點嚴重
往年各方隊伍在這種情況下通常會扛不住掉個一場比賽
然後可能以4-1或4-2封王
可是可是阿 今天的阿勇好像不太順聯盟老大的意
硬是靠著浮誇的團隊戰力拿下這場比賽
我是在想 如果不討論史上最強的隊伍
而是討論
歷史上最抗哨的隊伍呢?
畢竟勇士的專長就是三分球,以及靠著強大外線吸怪
製造禁區空檔的各種戰術
進攻端呢 相較靠單打的隊伍
比較不會有對手防守尺度大增 裁判卻故意不吹的問題
防守端呢 又有一票6'6~6'8的球員可以無限換防
而且都滿大牌的 裁判也很難一直藉故BBBBB
請問勇士是歷史上最抗哨的隊伍嗎?
--
外甥從幼稚園回來 說他今天用十張貼紙
去跟其他小朋友換了兩張貼紙
本來想罵他笨 卻突然想起 以前曾愛過一個人
我幾乎給了全部 卻什麼也換不回來
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 36.231.165.201
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1496930850.A.999.html
推
06/08 22:07, , 1F
06/08 22:07, 1F
推
06/08 22:07, , 2F
06/08 22:07, 2F
推
06/08 22:07, , 3F
06/08 22:07, 3F
→
06/08 22:08, , 4F
06/08 22:08, 4F
→
06/08 22:08, , 5F
06/08 22:08, 5F
推
06/08 22:08, , 6F
06/08 22:08, 6F
→
06/08 22:08, , 7F
06/08 22:08, 7F
→
06/08 22:08, , 8F
06/08 22:08, 8F
→
06/08 22:08, , 9F
06/08 22:08, 9F
→
06/08 22:09, , 10F
06/08 22:09, 10F
推
06/08 22:09, , 11F
06/08 22:09, 11F
推
06/08 22:09, , 12F
06/08 22:09, 12F
推
06/08 22:09, , 13F
06/08 22:09, 13F
推
06/08 22:09, , 14F
06/08 22:09, 14F
推
06/08 22:10, , 15F
06/08 22:10, 15F
※ 編輯: abc7360393 (36.231.165.201), 06/08/2017 22:10:45
推
06/08 22:12, , 16F
06/08 22:12, 16F
→
06/08 22:12, , 17F
06/08 22:12, 17F
推
06/08 22:12, , 18F
06/08 22:12, 18F
推
06/08 22:12, , 19F
06/08 22:12, 19F
推
06/08 22:13, , 20F
06/08 22:13, 20F
→
06/08 22:13, , 21F
06/08 22:13, 21F
→
06/08 22:14, , 22F
06/08 22:14, 22F
推
06/08 22:16, , 23F
06/08 22:16, 23F
推
06/08 22:16, , 24F
06/08 22:16, 24F
推
06/08 22:17, , 25F
06/08 22:17, 25F
推
06/08 22:19, , 26F
06/08 22:19, 26F
推
06/08 22:19, , 27F
06/08 22:19, 27F
推
06/08 22:19, , 28F
06/08 22:19, 28F
推
06/08 22:20, , 29F
06/08 22:20, 29F
噓
06/08 22:21, , 30F
06/08 22:21, 30F
推
06/08 22:22, , 31F
06/08 22:22, 31F
推
06/08 22:22, , 32F
06/08 22:22, 32F
推
06/08 22:22, , 33F
06/08 22:22, 33F
噓
06/08 22:22, , 34F
06/08 22:22, 34F
推
06/08 22:23, , 35F
06/08 22:23, 35F
推
06/08 22:24, , 36F
06/08 22:24, 36F
→
06/08 22:24, , 37F
06/08 22:24, 37F
→
06/08 22:24, , 38F
06/08 22:24, 38F
推
06/08 22:28, , 39F
06/08 22:28, 39F
推
06/08 22:30, , 40F
06/08 22:30, 40F
→
06/08 22:33, , 41F
06/08 22:33, 41F
推
06/08 22:34, , 42F
06/08 22:34, 42F
推
06/08 22:35, , 43F
06/08 22:35, 43F
推
06/08 22:42, , 44F
06/08 22:42, 44F
推
06/08 22:43, , 45F
06/08 22:43, 45F
推
06/08 22:48, , 46F
06/08 22:48, 46F
推
06/08 22:51, , 47F
06/08 22:51, 47F
推
06/08 22:54, , 48F
06/08 22:54, 48F
推
06/08 22:55, , 49F
06/08 22:55, 49F
→
06/08 22:55, , 50F
06/08 22:55, 50F
推
06/08 23:08, , 51F
06/08 23:08, 51F
推
06/08 23:09, , 52F
06/08 23:09, 52F
推
06/08 23:09, , 53F
06/08 23:09, 53F
→
06/08 23:10, , 54F
06/08 23:10, 54F
推
06/08 23:14, , 55F
06/08 23:14, 55F
推
06/08 23:15, , 56F
06/08 23:15, 56F
推
06/08 23:28, , 57F
06/08 23:28, 57F
→
06/08 23:41, , 58F
06/08 23:41, 58F
推
06/08 23:44, , 59F
06/08 23:44, 59F
推
06/08 23:45, , 60F
06/08 23:45, 60F
→
06/08 23:45, , 61F
06/08 23:45, 61F
推
06/09 00:10, , 62F
06/09 00:10, 62F
推
06/09 00:19, , 63F
06/09 00:19, 63F
推
06/09 00:24, , 64F
06/09 00:24, 64F
→
06/09 00:26, , 65F
06/09 00:26, 65F
推
06/09 00:36, , 66F
06/09 00:36, 66F
推
06/09 00:48, , 67F
06/09 00:48, 67F
推
06/09 00:51, , 68F
06/09 00:51, 68F
→
06/09 00:59, , 69F
06/09 00:59, 69F
推
06/09 01:01, , 70F
06/09 01:01, 70F
推
06/09 01:48, , 71F
06/09 01:48, 71F
推
06/09 01:53, , 72F
06/09 01:53, 72F
推
06/09 01:58, , 73F
06/09 01:58, 73F
推
06/09 02:32, , 74F
06/09 02:32, 74F
推
06/09 04:26, , 75F
06/09 04:26, 75F
推
06/09 05:41, , 76F
06/09 05:41, 76F
推
06/09 07:41, , 77F
06/09 07:41, 77F
噓
06/09 07:58, , 78F
06/09 07:58, 78F
推
06/09 08:10, , 79F
06/09 08:10, 79F
→
06/09 08:29, , 80F
06/09 08:29, 80F
推
06/09 08:46, , 81F
06/09 08:46, 81F
噓
06/09 08:55, , 82F
06/09 08:55, 82F
→
06/09 09:29, , 83F
06/09 09:29, 83F
推
06/09 09:46, , 84F
06/09 09:46, 84F
推
06/09 10:40, , 85F
06/09 10:40, 85F
推
06/09 10:45, , 86F
06/09 10:45, 86F
推
06/09 10:58, , 87F
06/09 10:58, 87F
噓
06/09 18:04, , 88F
06/09 18:04, 88F
推
06/09 20:32, , 89F
06/09 20:32, 89F
推
07/19 04:20, , 90F
07/19 04:20, 90F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):
討論
60
90