[討論] OK連線是史上最強的得分火力雙人組
昨天查了90年後單季同隊有兩個均分超過25分以上的組合
發現這是一件很難達到的條件 僅有七對組合完成 其中僅OK連線達成超過1次(01-03)
今天再擴大搜尋範圍和嚴格篩選條件
不限年代 單季出場數超過60場 同隊兩人均分超過27分 總計歷史只有三次完成
1965 湖人隊- J.West:31p/FG:49.7% E.Baylor:27.1p/FG:40.1%
2001 湖人隊- S.O'Neal:28.7p/FG:57.2% K.Bryant:28.5p/FG:46.4%
2003 湖人隊- K.Bryant:30p/FG:45.1% S.O'Neal:27.5p/FG:57.4%
都是湖人隊的組合 OK達成兩次 絕無僅有 且命中率更好
再看看季後賽部分 場次僅限制突破第一輪即可
1962 湖人隊- E.Baylor:38.6p/FG:43.8% J.West:31.5p/FG:46.5% 亞軍(僅兩輪13場)
1963 湖人隊- E.Baylor:32.6p/FG:44.2% J.West:27.8p/FG:50.3% 亞軍(僅兩輪13場)
1968 湖人隊- J.West:30.8p/FG:52.7% E.Baylor:28.5p/FG:46.8% 亞軍(三輪15場)
2001 湖人隊- S.O'Neal:30.4p/FG:55.5% K.Bryant:29.4p/FG:46.9% 冠軍(四輪16場)
2003 湖人隊- K.Bryant:32.1p/FG:43.2% S.O'Neal:27p/FG:53.5% 二輪(12場)
2017 勇士隊- K.Durant:28.5p/FG:55.6% S.Curry:28.1p/FG:48.4% 冠軍(四輪17場)
古早的貝勒爺和logo男達成三次最多 但都無冠
而OK連線達成兩次 尤其是2001年季賽和季後賽都達成
最有機會挑戰這兩個火力組合的當屬現今的勇士雙MVP了
在本屆季後賽的得分效率更勝一籌 不過勇士還有KT/嘴綠兩大全明星
比較起來湖人的兩個組合就真的是靠兩個巨星打天下
綜合來看 無論OK連線是不是最強雙人組 但肯定是得分火力最強的雙人組合
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 220.130.51.217
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1506133576.A.D2F.html
推
09/23 10:28, , 1F
09/23 10:28, 1F
推
09/23 10:30, , 2F
09/23 10:30, 2F
推
09/23 10:35, , 3F
09/23 10:35, 3F
推
09/23 10:36, , 4F
09/23 10:36, 4F
推
09/23 10:37, , 5F
09/23 10:37, 5F
→
09/23 10:37, , 6F
09/23 10:37, 6F
推
09/23 10:38, , 7F
09/23 10:38, 7F
推
09/23 10:43, , 8F
09/23 10:43, 8F
推
09/23 10:44, , 9F
09/23 10:44, 9F
→
09/23 10:44, , 10F
09/23 10:44, 10F
推
09/23 10:49, , 11F
09/23 10:49, 11F
推
09/23 10:59, , 12F
09/23 10:59, 12F
→
09/23 11:01, , 13F
09/23 11:01, 13F
推
09/23 11:04, , 14F
09/23 11:04, 14F
推
09/23 11:04, , 15F
09/23 11:04, 15F
→
09/23 11:04, , 16F
09/23 11:04, 16F
→
09/23 11:09, , 17F
09/23 11:09, 17F
推
09/23 11:14, , 18F
09/23 11:14, 18F
推
09/23 11:46, , 19F
09/23 11:46, 19F
→
09/23 12:03, , 20F
09/23 12:03, 20F
→
09/23 12:04, , 21F
09/23 12:04, 21F
推
09/23 13:47, , 22F
09/23 13:47, 22F
推
09/23 14:08, , 23F
09/23 14:08, 23F
推
09/23 14:09, , 24F
09/23 14:09, 24F
推
09/23 14:32, , 25F
09/23 14:32, 25F
推
09/23 14:40, , 26F
09/23 14:40, 26F
推
09/23 14:48, , 27F
09/23 14:48, 27F
推
09/23 15:49, , 28F
09/23 15:49, 28F
→
09/23 15:49, , 29F
09/23 15:49, 29F
推
09/23 16:10, , 30F
09/23 16:10, 30F
推
09/23 16:16, , 31F
09/23 16:16, 31F
推
09/23 17:07, , 32F
09/23 17:07, 32F
推
09/23 17:16, , 33F
09/23 17:16, 33F
推
09/23 18:03, , 34F
09/23 18:03, 34F
推
09/23 18:47, , 35F
09/23 18:47, 35F
→
09/23 18:47, , 36F
09/23 18:47, 36F
推
09/23 19:51, , 37F
09/23 19:51, 37F
推
09/23 20:10, , 38F
09/23 20:10, 38F
推
09/23 20:11, , 39F
09/23 20:11, 39F
→
09/24 00:55, , 40F
09/24 00:55, 40F
推
09/24 16:57, , 41F
09/24 16:57, 41F
→
09/24 16:57, , 42F
09/24 16:57, 42F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):