Fw: [情報] 川普可能簽署H1B相關的行政命令
看板Oversea_Job作者bluebluelan (新陰流大目錄免許皆傳)時間7年前 (2017/01/31 05:06)推噓33(33推 0噓 40→)留言73則, 25人參與討論串1/2 (看更多)
彭博:
http://tinyurl.com/gnnl8hb
If implemented, the reforms could shift the way American companies like Microsoft Corp., Amazon.com Inc. and Apple Inc. recruit talent and force wholesale changes at Indian companies such as Infosys Ltd. and Wipro Ltd. Businesses would have to try to hire American first and if they recruit foreign workers, priority would be given to the most highly paid.
簡單的說就是ICC GG, 薪水比不上tech companies也掰掰了(還沒看到細項)
將會以給予外國人員工薪水越高的 享有越高的優先權取得H1B
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 24.5.244.173
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/studyabroad/M.1485810325.A.8F6.html
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
推
01/31 05:12, , 1F
01/31 05:12, 1F
→
01/31 05:12, , 2F
01/31 05:12, 2F
→
01/31 05:13, , 3F
01/31 05:13, 3F
推
01/31 05:15, , 4F
01/31 05:15, 4F
→
01/31 05:15, , 5F
01/31 05:15, 5F
→
01/31 05:15, , 6F
01/31 05:15, 6F
→
01/31 05:39, , 7F
01/31 05:39, 7F
→
01/31 06:01, , 8F
01/31 06:01, 8F
拍謝沒看仔細 蠻多打算在美國求職的台灣人很關心H1B 如果真的是看薪水來給簽證
其實對非tech的求職者都"相當"不利 甚至如果只看薪水 甚至還會有城鄉差距(?
推
01/31 06:31, , 9F
01/31 06:31, 9F
→
01/31 06:32, , 10F
01/31 06:32, 10F
前20名有13家consulting@@ 前三家ICC吃掉三分之一還是四分之一吧
→
01/31 07:18, , 11F
01/31 07:18, 11F
→
01/31 07:23, , 12F
01/31 07:23, 12F
推
01/31 10:19, , 13F
01/31 10:19, 13F
推
01/31 12:43, , 14F
01/31 12:43, 14F
推
01/31 12:57, , 15F
01/31 12:57, 15F
→
01/31 12:57, , 16F
01/31 12:57, 16F
而且draft 裡頭包含L1 E2 B1 連台灣公司外派可能都會被影響(換個方式想加薪就沒事了)
要是真的是用薪資比 基本上就只剩下大城市的缺 或者其他公司被迫match(?
比較可能是大城市以外的公司 只會考慮聘用有身份的人了
確實達到American first的成效
→
01/31 14:05, , 17F
01/31 14:05, 17F
推
01/31 14:14, , 18F
01/31 14:14, 18F
推
01/31 14:59, , 19F
01/31 14:59, 19F
推
01/31 16:19, , 20F
01/31 16:19, 20F
推
01/31 17:06, , 21F
01/31 17:06, 21F
推
01/31 17:17, , 22F
01/31 17:17, 22F
推
01/31 17:37, , 23F
01/31 17:37, 23F
就算少了那些ICC公司 矽谷公司招聘的bar也不會比較低 好處是那些有錢的小公司
不像大公司可以L1 留住員工的手段那麼多就是了
※ 編輯: bluebluelan (24.5.244.173), 01/31/2017 17:42:56
推
02/01 00:00, , 24F
02/01 00:00, 24F
→
02/01 00:01, , 25F
02/01 00:01, 25F
推
02/01 00:55, , 26F
02/01 00:55, 26F
→
02/01 01:21, , 27F
02/01 01:21, 27F
推
02/01 01:37, , 28F
02/01 01:37, 28F
→
02/01 01:49, , 29F
02/01 01:49, 29F
→
02/01 01:51, , 30F
02/01 01:51, 30F
→
02/01 01:52, , 31F
02/01 01:52, 31F
→
02/01 01:52, , 32F
02/01 01:52, 32F
→
02/01 01:56, , 33F
02/01 01:56, 33F
→
02/01 01:57, , 34F
02/01 01:57, 34F
推
02/01 01:58, , 35F
02/01 01:58, 35F
推
02/01 01:59, , 36F
02/01 01:59, 36F
→
02/01 02:00, , 37F
02/01 02:00, 37F
推
02/01 02:07, , 38F
02/01 02:07, 38F
→
02/01 02:07, , 39F
02/01 02:07, 39F
推
02/01 02:12, , 40F
02/01 02:12, 40F
推
02/01 02:22, , 41F
02/01 02:22, 41F
→
02/01 02:22, , 42F
02/01 02:22, 42F
推
02/01 02:38, , 43F
02/01 02:38, 43F
→
02/01 02:56, , 44F
02/01 02:56, 44F
推
02/01 02:57, , 45F
02/01 02:57, 45F
推
02/01 03:11, , 46F
02/01 03:11, 46F
→
02/01 03:11, , 47F
02/01 03:11, 47F
推
02/01 03:28, , 48F
02/01 03:28, 48F
推
02/01 04:36, , 49F
02/01 04:36, 49F
推
02/01 04:36, , 50F
02/01 04:36, 50F
推
02/01 04:40, , 51F
02/01 04:40, 51F
推
02/01 04:40, , 52F
02/01 04:40, 52F
推
02/01 04:41, , 53F
02/01 04:41, 53F
→
02/01 04:51, , 54F
02/01 04:51, 54F
→
02/01 04:52, , 55F
02/01 04:52, 55F
→
02/01 04:56, , 56F
02/01 04:56, 56F
→
02/01 05:45, , 57F
02/01 05:45, 57F
推
02/01 07:21, , 58F
02/01 07:21, 58F
→
02/01 07:21, , 59F
02/01 07:21, 59F
→
02/01 07:21, , 60F
02/01 07:21, 60F
推
02/01 08:14, , 61F
02/01 08:14, 61F
→
02/01 08:35, , 62F
02/01 08:35, 62F
→
02/01 08:35, , 63F
02/01 08:35, 63F
→
02/01 08:36, , 64F
02/01 08:36, 64F
→
02/01 08:47, , 65F
02/01 08:47, 65F
→
02/01 08:47, , 66F
02/01 08:47, 66F
→
02/01 08:52, , 67F
02/01 08:52, 67F
→
02/01 09:00, , 68F
02/01 09:00, 68F
→
02/01 09:01, , 69F
02/01 09:01, 69F
→
02/01 11:09, , 70F
02/01 11:09, 70F
推
02/01 15:38, , 71F
02/01 15:38, 71F
推
02/02 01:36, , 72F
02/02 01:36, 72F
→
02/02 05:50, , 73F
02/02 05:50, 73F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):