[討論] 霹靂online應該很賺怎麼沒公司願意做?
如題
霹靂單機遊戲不少,品質都不錯
如奇俠傳 幽靈劍 聖石傳說
網路遊戲則是出過創世霹靂
為何之後就沒有公司願意開發RPG型的霹靂online?
霹靂戲迷這麼多,遊戲內容媲美三國金庸用不完
理論上開發霹靂online應該很賺才是?
該不會是權利金貴的嚇人吧?
希望不要幾年後還是只能玩玩霹靂DOTA乾過癮
P.S
以前MUD曾出過「霹靂爭雄錄」還蠻好玩的,雖然知道的人不多...
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 180.176.2.165
→
06/11 08:11, , 1F
06/11 08:11, 1F
推
06/11 08:16, , 2F
06/11 08:16, 2F
推
06/11 08:22, , 3F
06/11 08:22, 3F
→
06/11 08:40, , 4F
06/11 08:40, 4F
→
06/11 08:59, , 5F
06/11 08:59, 5F
→
06/11 09:00, , 6F
06/11 09:00, 6F
→
06/11 09:02, , 7F
06/11 09:02, 7F
→
06/11 09:18, , 8F
06/11 09:18, 8F
→
06/11 09:35, , 9F
06/11 09:35, 9F
推
06/11 10:01, , 10F
06/11 10:01, 10F
→
06/11 10:02, , 11F
06/11 10:02, 11F
→
06/11 10:02, , 12F
06/11 10:02, 12F
→
06/11 10:03, , 13F
06/11 10:03, 13F
→
06/11 10:04, , 14F
06/11 10:04, 14F
→
06/11 10:05, , 15F
06/11 10:05, 15F
推
06/11 10:18, , 16F
06/11 10:18, 16F
推
06/11 10:18, , 17F
06/11 10:18, 17F
推
06/11 10:25, , 18F
06/11 10:25, 18F
推
06/11 10:27, , 19F
06/11 10:27, 19F
推
06/11 10:45, , 20F
06/11 10:45, 20F
→
06/11 10:49, , 21F
06/11 10:49, 21F
→
06/11 10:53, , 22F
06/11 10:53, 22F
→
06/11 11:02, , 23F
06/11 11:02, 23F
推
06/11 12:12, , 24F
06/11 12:12, 24F
→
06/11 12:42, , 25F
06/11 12:42, 25F
推
06/11 12:44, , 26F
06/11 12:44, 26F
推
06/11 12:54, , 27F
06/11 12:54, 27F
→
06/11 12:54, , 28F
06/11 12:54, 28F
推
06/11 12:55, , 29F
06/11 12:55, 29F
推
06/11 12:55, , 30F
06/11 12:55, 30F
→
06/11 12:56, , 31F
06/11 12:56, 31F
→
06/11 12:57, , 32F
06/11 12:57, 32F
→
06/11 12:57, , 33F
06/11 12:57, 33F
→
06/11 13:06, , 34F
06/11 13:06, 34F
推
06/11 13:09, , 35F
06/11 13:09, 35F
推
06/11 13:29, , 36F
06/11 13:29, 36F
推
06/11 13:34, , 37F
06/11 13:34, 37F
→
06/11 13:35, , 38F
06/11 13:35, 38F
推
06/11 13:39, , 39F
06/11 13:39, 39F
推
06/11 13:43, , 40F
06/11 13:43, 40F
推
06/11 14:15, , 41F
06/11 14:15, 41F
推
06/11 14:18, , 42F
06/11 14:18, 42F
→
06/11 14:18, , 43F
06/11 14:18, 43F
→
06/11 15:28, , 44F
06/11 15:28, 44F
推
06/11 15:41, , 45F
06/11 15:41, 45F
→
06/11 17:24, , 46F
06/11 17:24, 46F
推
06/11 17:37, , 47F
06/11 17:37, 47F
→
06/11 17:37, , 48F
06/11 17:37, 48F
推
06/11 18:33, , 49F
06/11 18:33, 49F
→
06/11 18:48, , 50F
06/11 18:48, 50F
→
06/11 18:54, , 51F
06/11 18:54, 51F
推
06/11 19:37, , 52F
06/11 19:37, 52F
→
06/11 19:37, , 53F
06/11 19:37, 53F
推
06/11 19:37, , 54F
06/11 19:37, 54F
推
06/11 19:53, , 55F
06/11 19:53, 55F
→
06/11 19:54, , 56F
06/11 19:54, 56F
→
06/11 19:55, , 57F
06/11 19:55, 57F
→
06/11 19:56, , 58F
06/11 19:56, 58F
→
06/11 20:18, , 59F
06/11 20:18, 59F
推
06/11 20:33, , 60F
06/11 20:33, 60F
→
06/11 20:54, , 61F
06/11 20:54, 61F
→
06/11 23:32, , 62F
06/11 23:32, 62F
推
06/12 00:54, , 63F
06/12 00:54, 63F
推
06/12 03:46, , 64F
06/12 03:46, 64F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 11 篇):