Re: JD Drew
我最近很難理解為何球界當JD Drew和他的"好朋友"Adam Dunn為三流的打者。
10/4, Joe Posnanski寫的, Theo受到電台訪問, 為JD Drew辯護, 節錄:
"The radio guys here protest a little … they point out that
while Drew’s OPS is usually good, they aren’t sure that
it has led to PRODUCTION — namely runs scored and RBIs.
And this is when Theo really takes over. I bold out a few
of my favorite thoughts in this wonderful little lesson:
＜譯：電台主持人抗辯，指出Drew的OPS沒有得分貢獻。Ｔheo給他們上了一課：＞
[Epstein:]“That’s not true. With RBIs, yes. Based on his skill set,
he’s always going to have underwhelming RBI totals. I
couldn’t care less. When you’re putting together a
winning team, that honestly doesn’t matter. When you have
a player who takes a ton of walks, who doesn’t put the
ball in play at an above average rate, and is a certain
type of hitter, he’s not going to drive in a lot of runs.
Runs scored, you couldn’t be more wrong. If you look at a
rate basis, J.D. scores a ton of runs.
＜譯：「錯。要打造會贏球的球隊，我不在意打點。Drew的特性是
走路，不是玩BABIP。你會除法的話，看得出來這樣的得分率很高；＞
“And the reason he scores a ton of runs is because he does
the single most important thing you can do in baseball as
an offensive player. And that’s NOT MAKE OUTS. He doesn’t
make outs. He’s always among our team leaders in on-base
percentage, usually among the league leaders in on-base
percentage. And he’s a really good base runner."
＜「因為，一位打者最大的貢獻在於不製造出局數。Drew的上壘率
領先聯盟，而且他還是很好的跑者。＞
另外，Theo還說過Drew是很好的右外野守備員。而這些又回答了
Tim McCarver說過的："沒有人可以敎JD Drew怎麼玩棒球。"
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 220.136.79.4
※ 編輯: Dorasaga 來自: 220.136.79.4 (10/15 05:59)
推
10/15 12:41, , 1F
10/15 12:41, 1F
推
10/15 13:09, , 2F
10/15 13:09, 2F
推
10/15 14:06, , 3F
10/15 14:06, 3F
→
10/15 14:07, , 4F
10/15 14:07, 4F
推
10/15 15:37, , 5F
10/15 15:37, 5F
→
10/15 16:06, , 6F
10/15 16:06, 6F
推
10/15 16:06, , 7F
10/15 16:06, 7F
→
10/15 16:06, , 8F
10/15 16:06, 8F
推
10/15 17:19, , 9F
10/15 17:19, 9F
推
10/15 18:54, , 10F
10/15 18:54, 10F
推
10/15 20:13, , 11F
10/15 20:13, 11F
推
10/15 20:23, , 12F
10/15 20:23, 12F
→
10/15 20:24, , 13F
10/15 20:24, 13F
推
10/15 20:26, , 14F
10/15 20:26, 14F
推
10/15 21:56, , 15F
10/15 21:56, 15F
推
10/16 23:38, , 16F
10/16 23:38, 16F
→
10/16 23:39, , 17F
10/16 23:39, 17F
推
10/19 02:14, , 18F
10/19 02:14, 18F
推
10/19 16:49, , 19F
10/19 16:49, 19F
討論串 (同標題文章)