[閒聊] 評分太低害uber司機被停權會很壞嗎?已回收
剛剛從文山區搭uber走信義快速道路,要到國父紀念館那邊
司機路線超級不熟悉,而且差點走到國道三號(囧
真的誇張,原本想給3顆星,可是司機的評分是4.4 算是非常低了
之前聽說平均4.2司機就會被停權,如果我打3顆 司機絕對會被停權
但是我媽叫我不要害司機沒工作,所以我還是評5星,意見寫:路線十分不熟悉
評太低司機會沒工作,畢竟人家也是賺辛苦錢
評高又違背自己的感覺
想說問問大家,如果妳遇到這個狀況,你會怎麼辦呢?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 114.25.198.21
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/WomenTalk/M.1455892440.A.A10.html
推
02/19 22:34, , 1F
02/19 22:34, 1F
不能給半顆欸
→
02/19 22:35, , 2F
02/19 22:35, 2F
→
02/19 22:36, , 3F
02/19 22:36, 3F
推
02/19 22:36, , 4F
02/19 22:36, 4F
→
02/19 22:36, , 5F
02/19 22:36, 5F
司機態度真的很有禮貌 一直道歉,所以我也不忍心打3星
※ 編輯: darrenwang (114.25.198.21), 02/19/2016 22:38:30
推
02/19 22:39, , 6F
02/19 22:39, 6F
→
02/19 22:39, , 7F
02/19 22:39, 7F
→
02/19 22:39, , 8F
02/19 22:39, 8F
推
02/19 22:40, , 9F
02/19 22:40, 9F
→
02/19 22:40, , 10F
02/19 22:40, 10F
→
02/19 22:40, , 11F
02/19 22:40, 11F
推
02/19 22:40, , 12F
02/19 22:40, 12F
→
02/19 22:40, , 13F
02/19 22:40, 13F
→
02/19 22:40, , 14F
02/19 22:40, 14F
→
02/19 22:40, , 15F
02/19 22:40, 15F
→
02/19 22:42, , 16F
02/19 22:42, 16F
→
02/19 22:43, , 17F
02/19 22:43, 17F
→
02/19 22:43, , 18F
02/19 22:43, 18F
→
02/19 22:43, , 19F
02/19 22:43, 19F
→
02/19 22:43, , 20F
02/19 22:43, 20F
推
02/19 22:45, , 21F
02/19 22:45, 21F
推
02/19 22:49, , 22F
02/19 22:49, 22F
推
02/19 22:49, , 23F
02/19 22:49, 23F
→
02/19 22:50, , 24F
02/19 22:50, 24F
→
02/19 22:50, , 25F
02/19 22:50, 25F
→
02/19 22:51, , 26F
02/19 22:51, 26F
推
02/19 22:59, , 27F
02/19 22:59, 27F
推
02/19 23:14, , 28F
02/19 23:14, 28F
→
02/19 23:14, , 29F
02/19 23:14, 29F
→
02/19 23:34, , 30F
02/19 23:34, 30F
→
02/19 23:34, , 31F
02/19 23:34, 31F
推
02/19 23:37, , 32F
02/19 23:37, 32F
→
02/19 23:37, , 33F
02/19 23:37, 33F
→
02/19 23:37, , 34F
02/19 23:37, 34F
→
02/19 23:37, , 35F
02/19 23:37, 35F
→
02/19 23:37, , 36F
02/19 23:37, 36F
→
02/19 23:37, , 37F
02/19 23:37, 37F
→
02/19 23:43, , 38F
02/19 23:43, 38F
→
02/19 23:45, , 39F
02/19 23:45, 39F
→
02/19 23:45, , 40F
02/19 23:45, 40F
推
02/19 23:51, , 41F
02/19 23:51, 41F
→
02/19 23:51, , 42F
02/19 23:51, 42F
噓
02/19 23:52, , 43F
02/19 23:52, 43F
推
02/20 00:04, , 44F
02/20 00:04, 44F
→
02/20 00:05, , 45F
02/20 00:05, 45F
推
02/20 00:05, , 46F
02/20 00:05, 46F
→
02/20 00:05, , 47F
02/20 00:05, 47F
→
02/20 00:06, , 48F
02/20 00:06, 48F
→
02/20 00:06, , 49F
02/20 00:06, 49F
→
02/20 00:06, , 50F
02/20 00:06, 50F
推
02/20 00:12, , 51F
02/20 00:12, 51F
推
02/20 00:40, , 52F
02/20 00:40, 52F
推
02/20 01:31, , 53F
02/20 01:31, 53F
→
02/20 01:31, , 54F
02/20 01:31, 54F
→
02/20 01:32, , 55F
02/20 01:32, 55F
推
02/20 01:33, , 56F
02/20 01:33, 56F
→
02/20 01:33, , 57F
02/20 01:33, 57F
→
02/20 01:33, , 58F
02/20 01:33, 58F
推
02/20 06:22, , 59F
02/20 06:22, 59F
噓
02/20 07:05, , 60F
02/20 07:05, 60F
→
02/20 07:05, , 61F
02/20 07:05, 61F
→
02/20 07:05, , 62F
02/20 07:05, 62F
推
02/20 10:03, , 63F
02/20 10:03, 63F
推
02/20 10:24, , 64F
02/20 10:24, 64F
→
02/20 10:24, , 65F
02/20 10:24, 65F
→
02/20 10:24, , 66F
02/20 10:24, 66F
→
02/20 10:24, , 67F
02/20 10:24, 67F
推
02/20 14:08, , 68F
02/20 14:08, 68F
推
02/22 15:43, , 69F
02/22 15:43, 69F
→
02/22 15:43, , 70F
02/22 15:43, 70F
噓
02/22 15:45, , 71F
02/22 15:45, 71F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 3 篇):